Efficacy of ergonomic modifications in the management of computer vision syndrome among medical students.

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_31_25
Mamta Singh, Gayatri Bhatia, Noor Husain, Priya Jagan
{"title":"Efficacy of ergonomic modifications in the management of computer vision syndrome among medical students.","authors":"Mamta Singh, Gayatri Bhatia, Noor Husain, Priya Jagan","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_31_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computer vision syndrome (CVS) is an increasingly prevalent ocular health concern among medical students due to visual display terminal (VDT) dependent learning methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of CVS among medical students and the effectiveness of a 2-week ergonomic intervention in reducing its symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Medical students between 17 and 25 years of age, using VDT for ≥6 months with corrected visual acuity of 6/6 were included. CVS score was recorded using a validated questionnaire. Participants attended a 1-h ergonomic counseling session, followed by a 2-week intervention period where adherence was tracked using an objective assessment card. On day 15, the preergonomic session CVS score was compared with postsession score to evaluate the efficacy of ergonomic modifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study of 114 participants (90 males and 24 females), cellphones (100%), laptops (46%), and tablets (40%) were the most common VDTs used. At baseline, the median CVS score was 4.00 (inter-quartile ratio [IQR]: 2.00-8.00), with 41.2% reporting CVS symptoms. Postintervention, CVS symptoms were reported in 18.4% participants. The median CVS score decreased significantly to 2.00 (IQR: 1.00-5.00; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, <i>Z</i> = -6.525, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Symptoms like burning, itching, and tearing improved significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), whereas others, including headache and blurred vision, showed no significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CVS is an increasingly prevalent ocular pathology among medical students. Adopting correct ergonomic practices can play a crucial step in the management of many of its symptoms, underscoring the importance of sensitizing VDT users to correct ergonomic principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"19 1","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13043120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_31_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Computer vision syndrome (CVS) is an increasingly prevalent ocular health concern among medical students due to visual display terminal (VDT) dependent learning methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of CVS among medical students and the effectiveness of a 2-week ergonomic intervention in reducing its symptoms.

Methodology: Medical students between 17 and 25 years of age, using VDT for ≥6 months with corrected visual acuity of 6/6 were included. CVS score was recorded using a validated questionnaire. Participants attended a 1-h ergonomic counseling session, followed by a 2-week intervention period where adherence was tracked using an objective assessment card. On day 15, the preergonomic session CVS score was compared with postsession score to evaluate the efficacy of ergonomic modifications.

Results: In the study of 114 participants (90 males and 24 females), cellphones (100%), laptops (46%), and tablets (40%) were the most common VDTs used. At baseline, the median CVS score was 4.00 (inter-quartile ratio [IQR]: 2.00-8.00), with 41.2% reporting CVS symptoms. Postintervention, CVS symptoms were reported in 18.4% participants. The median CVS score decreased significantly to 2.00 (IQR: 1.00-5.00; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Z = -6.525, P < 0.0001). Symptoms like burning, itching, and tearing improved significantly (P < 0.0001), whereas others, including headache and blurred vision, showed no significant improvement.

Conclusion: CVS is an increasingly prevalent ocular pathology among medical students. Adopting correct ergonomic practices can play a crucial step in the management of many of its symptoms, underscoring the importance of sensitizing VDT users to correct ergonomic principles.

人体工程学改造在医学生计算机视觉综合征治疗中的效果。
背景:由于依赖视觉显示终端(VDT)的学习方法,计算机视觉综合征(CVS)是医学生中日益普遍的眼部健康问题。本研究的目的是评估CVS在医学生中的患病率,以及为期2周的人体工程学干预在减轻其症状方面的有效性。方法:纳入年龄在17 - 25岁、使用VDT≥6个月、矫正视力为6/6的医学生。使用经过验证的问卷记录CVS评分。参与者参加了1小时的人体工程学咨询会议,随后是2周的干预期,使用客观评估卡跟踪依从性。在第15天,将人机工程学前的CVS评分与人机工程学修改后的评分进行比较,以评估人机工程学修改的效果。结果:在114名参与者(90名男性和24名女性)的研究中,手机(100%)、笔记本电脑(46%)和平板电脑(40%)是最常用的电子视频设备。基线时,CVS评分中位数为4.00(四分位数比[IQR]: 2.00-8.00), 41.2%的患者报告了CVS症状。干预后,18.4%的参与者报告了CVS症状。中位CVS评分显著下降至2.00 (IQR: 1.00-5.00; Wilcoxon sign -rank检验,Z = -6.525, P < 0.0001)。灼烧、瘙痒和撕裂等症状明显改善(P < 0.0001),而头痛和视力模糊等其他症状没有明显改善。结论:CVS在医学生中越来越普遍。采用正确的人体工程学做法可以在许多症状的管理中发挥关键的一步,强调了敏感的VDT用户正确的人体工程学原则的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书