Mechanical behavior of complete arch implant-supported prostheses with distal cantilevers fabricated from different digital material combinations.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nataly Mory Rubiños, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Pedro Díaz, Marta Revilla-León, Miguel Gómez-Polo
{"title":"Mechanical behavior of complete arch implant-supported prostheses with distal cantilevers fabricated from different digital material combinations.","authors":"Nataly Mory Rubiños, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Pedro Díaz, Marta Revilla-León, Miguel Gómez-Polo","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2026.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Complete arch implant-supported prostheses (CAISPs) often require distal cantilevers; however, evidence on the influence of framework and veneering material combinations remains limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the mechanical behavior of 6 digitally fabricated material configurations in CAISPs with 7.5- and 15-mm cantilevers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty screw-retained CAISPs (n=5 per group) were fabricated: cobalt chromium with feldspathic ceramic (CRCO-C), titanium alloy with high-impact polymer composite (TI-HIPC), monolithic zirconia (ZTN), veneered zirconia with porcelain (ZF-C), ceramic-filled polyetheretherketone (BioHPP) with composite resin (B-RC), and BioHPP with high-impact polymer composite veneer (B-HIPC). The specimens were thermocycled (10 000 cycles, 5 to 55 °C) and cyclic loaded (110 N, 300 000 cycles). Flexural strength testing was performed at both cantilever lengths to record maximum load (FMax), veneer fracture load (FChipping), and vertical deflection. Fracture modes were examined under optical microscopy. The data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and post hoc tests (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a 7.5-mm cantilever length, all groups except B-HIPC exceeded 900 N. CRCO-C (2098 ±43.8 N) and TI-HIPC (2060 ±115.5 N) showed the highest strength, followed by ZTN (1190 ±140.9 N), B-RC (1136 ±97.9 N), and ZF-C (910.6 ±272.5 N) (P<.001). At 15 mm, strength decreased by approximately 50% for B-RC and ZF-C, 35% for the TI-HIPC group and 24% for B-HIPC, while CRCO-C remained stable. Chipping resistance was highest for CRCO-C, followed by TI-HIPC and B-HIPC; milled composite resins showed greater resistance than conventional composite resins (P=.02). Deflection at Fmax was minimal (<0.3 mm) for CRCO-C and zirconia but higher for TI-HIPC and B-HIPC, particularly at 15 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At a 7.5-mm cantilever length, most tested material-design configurations achieved clinically acceptable fracture resistance. At 15 mm, values above the clinical threshold were observed only in the CRCO-C, TI-HIPC, and ZTN configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2026.03.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Complete arch implant-supported prostheses (CAISPs) often require distal cantilevers; however, evidence on the influence of framework and veneering material combinations remains limited.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the mechanical behavior of 6 digitally fabricated material configurations in CAISPs with 7.5- and 15-mm cantilevers.

Material and methods: Thirty screw-retained CAISPs (n=5 per group) were fabricated: cobalt chromium with feldspathic ceramic (CRCO-C), titanium alloy with high-impact polymer composite (TI-HIPC), monolithic zirconia (ZTN), veneered zirconia with porcelain (ZF-C), ceramic-filled polyetheretherketone (BioHPP) with composite resin (B-RC), and BioHPP with high-impact polymer composite veneer (B-HIPC). The specimens were thermocycled (10 000 cycles, 5 to 55 °C) and cyclic loaded (110 N, 300 000 cycles). Flexural strength testing was performed at both cantilever lengths to record maximum load (FMax), veneer fracture load (FChipping), and vertical deflection. Fracture modes were examined under optical microscopy. The data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and post hoc tests (α=.05).

Results: At a 7.5-mm cantilever length, all groups except B-HIPC exceeded 900 N. CRCO-C (2098 ±43.8 N) and TI-HIPC (2060 ±115.5 N) showed the highest strength, followed by ZTN (1190 ±140.9 N), B-RC (1136 ±97.9 N), and ZF-C (910.6 ±272.5 N) (P<.001). At 15 mm, strength decreased by approximately 50% for B-RC and ZF-C, 35% for the TI-HIPC group and 24% for B-HIPC, while CRCO-C remained stable. Chipping resistance was highest for CRCO-C, followed by TI-HIPC and B-HIPC; milled composite resins showed greater resistance than conventional composite resins (P=.02). Deflection at Fmax was minimal (<0.3 mm) for CRCO-C and zirconia but higher for TI-HIPC and B-HIPC, particularly at 15 mm.

Conclusions: At a 7.5-mm cantilever length, most tested material-design configurations achieved clinically acceptable fracture resistance. At 15 mm, values above the clinical threshold were observed only in the CRCO-C, TI-HIPC, and ZTN configurations.

不同数字材料组合制备的远端悬臂式全弓种植体支撑假体的力学行为。
问题说明:全弓种植体支持的假体(CAISPs)往往需要远端悬臂;然而,关于框架和贴面材料组合的影响的证据仍然有限。目的:本体外研究的目的是比较6种数字制造材料配置在7.5和15毫米悬臂的CAISPs中的力学行为。材料与方法:制备30个螺杆保留的CAISPs(每组5个):长石陶瓷钴铬(CRCO-C)、高冲击聚合物复合材料钛合金(TI-HIPC)、单片氧化锆(ZTN)、陶瓷贴面氧化锆(ZF-C)、陶瓷填充聚醚醚酮(BioHPP)复合树脂(B-RC)、高冲击聚合物复合贴面BioHPP (B-HIPC)。试样进行了热循环(10 000次,5 ~ 55°C)和循环加载(110 N, 30 000次)。在两种悬臂长度下进行弯曲强度测试,以记录最大载荷(FMax)、贴面断裂载荷(FChipping)和垂直挠度。在光学显微镜下观察断裂模式。采用双因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后检验(α= 0.05)对数据进行分析。结果:在7.5 mm悬臂长度下,除B-HIPC组外,其余组均超过900 N。CRCO-C(2098±43.8 N)和TI-HIPC(2060±115.5 N)强度最高,其次是ZTN(1190±140.9 N)、B-RC(1136±97.9 N)和ZF-C(910.6±272.5 N)。结论:在7.5 mm悬臂长度下,大多数测试材料设计配置达到临床可接受的抗骨折性。在15mm处,仅在CRCO-C、TI-HIPC和ZTN构型中观察到高于临床阈值的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书