Centripetal Axonal Transport as a Gateway to the CNS for Veterinary Antiparasitics: Bypassing the Blood-Brain Barrier, Clinical Impact in Vulnerable Age Groups, and the Potential Facilitating Role of PFAS.

IF 3 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Journal of Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jt/1785323
Domenico Britti, Romano Marabelli, Luigino Calzetta
{"title":"Centripetal Axonal Transport as a Gateway to the CNS for Veterinary Antiparasitics: Bypassing the Blood-Brain Barrier, Clinical Impact in Vulnerable Age Groups, and the Potential Facilitating Role of PFAS.","authors":"Domenico Britti, Romano Marabelli, Luigino Calzetta","doi":"10.1155/jt/1785323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread use of veterinary antiparasitics, including neonicotinoids, isoxazolines, avermectins, and pyrethroids, is essential for canine health but raises concerns regarding potential neurotoxicity, particularly in young and geriatric animals. While the blood-brain barrier (BBB) offers significant protection, this review confronts a central \"Safety Paradox\": how can a drug class with a demonstrated high therapeutic index in conventional safety studies be associated with a significant and persistent number of real-world neurological adverse events? We propose that centripetal (retrograde) axonal transport represents a critical, underappreciated pathway for these compounds to access the central nervous system (CNS) from peripheral nerve terminals, offering a mechanistic solution to this paradox. This mechanism, well documented for various toxins and pathogens, could allow antiparasitics to bypass the BBB, leading to direct neuronal effects and contributing to clinical signs such as tremors. We review the neurotoxic mechanisms of these common antiparasitics, the established principles of retrograde axonal transport, and the chemical properties that make them candidates for such transport. Furthermore, we introduce the expanded hypothesis that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)-present not only as \"inert\" ingredients or contaminants but, as recent regulatory findings reveal, also as active ingredients themselves-could act as both facilitators of transport for other neurotoxicants and as direct, cotransported neurotoxic agents. This review synthesizes existing and recent evidence to build a compelling case for axonal transport as a significant contributor to antiparasitic neurotoxicity, discusses its potential for differential clinical impact in young and old dogs, and highlights the urgent need for research into this pathway and the complex toxicological role of formulation components like PFAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"1785323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13042349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jt/1785323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of veterinary antiparasitics, including neonicotinoids, isoxazolines, avermectins, and pyrethroids, is essential for canine health but raises concerns regarding potential neurotoxicity, particularly in young and geriatric animals. While the blood-brain barrier (BBB) offers significant protection, this review confronts a central "Safety Paradox": how can a drug class with a demonstrated high therapeutic index in conventional safety studies be associated with a significant and persistent number of real-world neurological adverse events? We propose that centripetal (retrograde) axonal transport represents a critical, underappreciated pathway for these compounds to access the central nervous system (CNS) from peripheral nerve terminals, offering a mechanistic solution to this paradox. This mechanism, well documented for various toxins and pathogens, could allow antiparasitics to bypass the BBB, leading to direct neuronal effects and contributing to clinical signs such as tremors. We review the neurotoxic mechanisms of these common antiparasitics, the established principles of retrograde axonal transport, and the chemical properties that make them candidates for such transport. Furthermore, we introduce the expanded hypothesis that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)-present not only as "inert" ingredients or contaminants but, as recent regulatory findings reveal, also as active ingredients themselves-could act as both facilitators of transport for other neurotoxicants and as direct, cotransported neurotoxic agents. This review synthesizes existing and recent evidence to build a compelling case for axonal transport as a significant contributor to antiparasitic neurotoxicity, discusses its potential for differential clinical impact in young and old dogs, and highlights the urgent need for research into this pathway and the complex toxicological role of formulation components like PFAS.

向心轴突转运作为兽医抗寄生虫进入中枢神经系统的门户:绕过血脑屏障,易感年龄组的临床影响,以及PFAS的潜在促进作用。
兽药抗寄生虫药的广泛使用,包括新烟碱类、异恶唑啉类、阿维菌素和拟除虫菊酯,对犬类健康至关重要,但也引起了对潜在神经毒性的担忧,特别是对幼龄和老年动物。虽然血脑屏障(BBB)提供了重要的保护,但本综述面临一个核心的“安全性悖论”:在传统安全性研究中表现出高治疗指数的药物类别如何与现实世界中显著且持续的神经系统不良事件相关?我们提出向心(逆行)轴突运输代表了这些化合物从外周神经末梢进入中枢神经系统(CNS)的关键途径,为这一悖论提供了一个机制解决方案。这一机制在各种毒素和病原体中都得到了充分的证明,它可能允许抗寄生虫绕过血脑屏障,导致直接的神经元效应,并导致震颤等临床症状。我们回顾了这些常见抗寄生虫药的神经毒性机制,已建立的逆行轴突运输原理,以及使它们成为这种运输候选者的化学性质。此外,我们引入了一个扩展的假设,即全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)——不仅作为“惰性”成分或污染物存在,而且正如最近的监管发现所揭示的那样,它们本身也是活性成分——既可以作为其他神经毒物运输的促进剂,也可以作为直接、共运输的神经毒物。本综述综合了现有和最新的证据,构建了轴突转运作为抗寄生虫神经毒性的重要因素的令人信服的案例,讨论了其在年轻和老年狗的不同临床影响的潜力,并强调了迫切需要研究这一途径以及配方成分如PFAS的复杂毒理学作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Toxicology
Journal of Toxicology TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Toxicology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of toxicological sciences. The journal will consider articles looking at the structure, function, and mechanism of agents that are toxic to humans and/or animals, as well as toxicological medicine, risk assessment, safety evaluation, and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书