IMMOBILIZATION OF COLLARED PECCARIES (PECARI TAJACU) UNDER MANAGED CARE USING MEDETOMIDINE-TILETAMINE-ZOLAZEPAM VERSUS MEDETOMIDINE-KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM AND REVERSAL WITH ATIPAMEZOLE: A RANDOMIZED, BLINDED CLINICAL TRIAL.

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Yasmin Bernstain, Yishai Kushnir, Nili Avni-Magen, Avital Paz-Sonnenfeld, Yael Shilo-Benjamini
{"title":"IMMOBILIZATION OF COLLARED PECCARIES (<i>PECARI TAJACU</i>) UNDER MANAGED CARE USING MEDETOMIDINE-TILETAMINE-ZOLAZEPAM <i>VERSUS</i> MEDETOMIDINE-KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM AND REVERSAL WITH ATIPAMEZOLE: A RANDOMIZED, BLINDED CLINICAL TRIAL.","authors":"Yasmin Bernstain, Yishai Kushnir, Nili Avni-Magen, Avital Paz-Sonnenfeld, Yael Shilo-Benjamini","doi":"10.1638/2025-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objectives of this study were to compare two medetomidine-based protocols followed by atipamezole reversal, assessing immobilization and recovery in collared peccary (<i>Pecari tajacu</i>). Nineteen collared peccaries under managed care scheduled for tracking collar placement and routine treatments were randomly assigned to one of two protocols; medetomidine 48 ± 6 µg/kg and 2.23 ± 0.44 mg/kg tiletamine-zolazepam (Med-TZ; <i>n</i> = 9) or medetomidine 46 ± 8 µg/kg with 3.29 ± 0.45 mg/kg ketamine and 0.23 ± 0.04 mg/kg midazolam (Med-KM; <i>n</i> = 10) injected intramuscularly (IM). Both groups received reversal with IM atipamezole at five times the medetomidine dose. Physiological variables, duration and quality (scale 1-5; 1, poor; 5, excellent) of induction, immobilization, and recovery were recorded by a single-blinded observer. Data were analyzed using student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in any variable assessed. Median (range) induction times were 6 (2-33) min (Med-TZ) and 6 (4-12) min (Med-KM). A supplemental dose was required in 3/9 (Med-TZ) and 1/9 (Med-KM) animals. Mean ± standard deviation recovery times were 48 ± 32 min (Med-TZ) and 47 ± 22 min (Med-KM). Median induction, immobilization and recovery qualities were 4 (1-5), 4 (1-5) and 2 (1-5) (Med-TZ), and 5 (3-5), 4 (3-5) and 3 (2-4) (Med-KM), respectively. Median hemoglobin oxygen saturation was 94% (54-98; Med-TZ) and 95% (77-98; Med-KM). At the doses used, Med-TZ and Med-KM provided comparable and reliable immobilization with fair to good recovery quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"10-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2025-0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare two medetomidine-based protocols followed by atipamezole reversal, assessing immobilization and recovery in collared peccary (Pecari tajacu). Nineteen collared peccaries under managed care scheduled for tracking collar placement and routine treatments were randomly assigned to one of two protocols; medetomidine 48 ± 6 µg/kg and 2.23 ± 0.44 mg/kg tiletamine-zolazepam (Med-TZ; n = 9) or medetomidine 46 ± 8 µg/kg with 3.29 ± 0.45 mg/kg ketamine and 0.23 ± 0.04 mg/kg midazolam (Med-KM; n = 10) injected intramuscularly (IM). Both groups received reversal with IM atipamezole at five times the medetomidine dose. Physiological variables, duration and quality (scale 1-5; 1, poor; 5, excellent) of induction, immobilization, and recovery were recorded by a single-blinded observer. Data were analyzed using student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in any variable assessed. Median (range) induction times were 6 (2-33) min (Med-TZ) and 6 (4-12) min (Med-KM). A supplemental dose was required in 3/9 (Med-TZ) and 1/9 (Med-KM) animals. Mean ± standard deviation recovery times were 48 ± 32 min (Med-TZ) and 47 ± 22 min (Med-KM). Median induction, immobilization and recovery qualities were 4 (1-5), 4 (1-5) and 2 (1-5) (Med-TZ), and 5 (3-5), 4 (3-5) and 3 (2-4) (Med-KM), respectively. Median hemoglobin oxygen saturation was 94% (54-98; Med-TZ) and 95% (77-98; Med-KM). At the doses used, Med-TZ and Med-KM provided comparable and reliable immobilization with fair to good recovery quality.

在管理护理下使用美托咪定-替乐他明-唑西泮与美托咪定-氯胺酮-咪达唑仑和阿替帕唑逆转固定有领pecari tajacu:一项随机、盲法临床试验。
本研究的目的是比较两种基于美托咪定的方案,然后是阿替帕唑逆转,评估有领Pecari tajacu的固定和恢复。19只戴项圈的管理护理动物被随机分配到两种方案中的一种,计划跟踪项圈的放置和常规治疗;美托咪定48±6µg/kg和2.23±0.44 mg/kg替他胺-唑西泮(Med-TZ; n = 9)或美托咪定46±8µg/kg与3.29±0.45 mg/kg氯胺酮和0.23±0.04 mg/kg咪达唑仑(Med-KM; n = 10)肌内注射。两组均以5倍于美托咪定剂量的阿替帕唑进行逆转治疗。诱导、固定和恢复的生理变量、持续时间和质量(量表1-5;1,差;5,优)由单盲观察者记录。数据分析采用学生t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Fisher确切检验(p < 0.05)。两组间在评估的任何变量上均无显著差异。诱导时间中位数(范围)分别为6 (2-33)min (Med-TZ)和6 (4-12)min (Med-KM)。3/9 (Med-TZ)和1/9 (Med-KM)动物需要补充剂量。平均±标准差恢复时间分别为48±32 min (Med-TZ)和47±22 min (Med-KM)。中位诱导、固定和恢复质量分别为4(1-5)、4(1-5)和2 (1-5)(Med-TZ), 5(3-5)、4(3-5)和3 (2-4)(Med-KM)。中位血红蛋白氧饱和度为94% (54-98;Med-TZ)和95% (77-98;Med-KM)。在使用的剂量下,Med-TZ和Med-KM提供了相当可靠的固定,恢复质量良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers. The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution. Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书