Initial Condition Decision to Ensure Reliable Circadian Phase Estimation With Shorter-Term Wearable Data.

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Dongju Lim, Juhyeon Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Jae Kyoung Kim
{"title":"Initial Condition Decision to Ensure Reliable Circadian Phase Estimation With Shorter-Term Wearable Data.","authors":"Dongju Lim, Juhyeon Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Jae Kyoung Kim","doi":"10.1177/07487304261430123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various studies in the medical field highlight the importance of circadian medicine, which optimizes treatment timing based on patients' circadian phases. While the circadian phase has been measured using dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), the gold standard marker, its high cost and time-intensive nature have led to the development of alternative estimation methods. Among these, the most promising method is using ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, which simulate the circadian rhythm by using a light exposure profile estimated from sleep data. These ODE models require an initial condition (IC) representing the initial state of the circadian rhythm, which is unknown in real-world settings. However, it is unclear how the uncertainty of IC affects the accuracy of circadian phase estimation. In this study, by using sleep data collected from 28 shift workers using ActiWatch (mean duration = 56 days, range = 34-75 days), we found that ≥18 days of sleep data are required for the circadian phase to become independent of the subjective IC choice. The result showed that without an accurate IC, circadian phase estimation is dependent on subjective IC choice, meaning that circadian phase estimates in the first 17 days are not reliable. Indeed, these days were reduced to 11-14 days on average when previous studies' IC estimation methods were used. To further shorten this length, we developed new IC estimation methods-period-based and work history-based sleep methods-that incorporate daily variations in sleep history. Notably, the new methods reduced the number of days required for reliable circadian phase estimation to about 5 days. Hence, our approach allows a larger portion of circadian phase estimates from given sleep data to be used as reliable information. The superiority of our methods paves the way for improved circadian phase estimation, ultimately enhancing the practicality of chronotherapy applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Rhythms","volume":" ","pages":"7487304261430123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07487304261430123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various studies in the medical field highlight the importance of circadian medicine, which optimizes treatment timing based on patients' circadian phases. While the circadian phase has been measured using dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), the gold standard marker, its high cost and time-intensive nature have led to the development of alternative estimation methods. Among these, the most promising method is using ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, which simulate the circadian rhythm by using a light exposure profile estimated from sleep data. These ODE models require an initial condition (IC) representing the initial state of the circadian rhythm, which is unknown in real-world settings. However, it is unclear how the uncertainty of IC affects the accuracy of circadian phase estimation. In this study, by using sleep data collected from 28 shift workers using ActiWatch (mean duration = 56 days, range = 34-75 days), we found that ≥18 days of sleep data are required for the circadian phase to become independent of the subjective IC choice. The result showed that without an accurate IC, circadian phase estimation is dependent on subjective IC choice, meaning that circadian phase estimates in the first 17 days are not reliable. Indeed, these days were reduced to 11-14 days on average when previous studies' IC estimation methods were used. To further shorten this length, we developed new IC estimation methods-period-based and work history-based sleep methods-that incorporate daily variations in sleep history. Notably, the new methods reduced the number of days required for reliable circadian phase estimation to about 5 days. Hence, our approach allows a larger portion of circadian phase estimates from given sleep data to be used as reliable information. The superiority of our methods paves the way for improved circadian phase estimation, ultimately enhancing the practicality of chronotherapy applications.

初始条件决策确保短期可穿戴数据可靠的昼夜相位估计。
医学领域的各种研究都强调了昼夜节律医学的重要性,昼夜节律医学根据患者的昼夜节律阶段优化治疗时机。虽然使用暗光褪黑激素起效(DLMO)(黄金标准标记)测量昼夜节律阶段,但其高成本和时间密集的性质导致了替代估计方法的发展。其中,最有希望的方法是使用常微分方程(ODE)模型,该模型通过使用从睡眠数据估计的光暴露剖面来模拟昼夜节律。这些ODE模型需要一个初始条件(IC)来表示昼夜节律的初始状态,这在现实环境中是未知的。然而,IC的不确定性如何影响昼夜节律相位估计的准确性尚不清楚。在这项研究中,通过使用ActiWatch收集的28名轮班工人的睡眠数据(平均持续时间= 56天,范围= 34-75天),我们发现需要≥18天的睡眠数据才能使昼夜节律阶段独立于主观IC选择。结果表明,如果没有准确的IC,昼夜节律相位估计依赖于主观IC选择,这意味着前17天的昼夜节律相位估计是不可靠的。事实上,当使用先前研究的IC估计方法时,这些天平均减少到11-14天。为了进一步缩短这个长度,我们开发了新的IC估计方法——基于周期和基于工作历史的睡眠方法——将睡眠历史的日常变化纳入其中。值得注意的是,新方法将可靠的昼夜节律相位估计所需的天数减少到约5天。因此,我们的方法允许从给定的睡眠数据中获得更大一部分的昼夜节律相位估计,作为可靠的信息。我们方法的优越性为改进昼夜节律相位估计铺平了道路,最终增强了时间疗法应用的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biological Rhythms is the official journal of the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms and offers peer-reviewed original research in all aspects of biological rhythms, using genetic, biochemical, physiological, behavioral, epidemiological & modeling approaches, as well as clinical trials. Emphasis is on circadian and seasonal rhythms, but timely reviews and research on other periodicities are also considered. The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书