Malignant effusions serve as a feasible source for therapy-related biomarker testing in advanced gastric cancer.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Wenhao Ren, Qian Wang, Yiyi Guo, Haizhu Jin, Xiuli Ma, Yanli Zhu
{"title":"Malignant effusions serve as a feasible source for therapy-related biomarker testing in advanced gastric cancer.","authors":"Wenhao Ren, Qian Wang, Yiyi Guo, Haizhu Jin, Xiuli Ma, Yanli Zhu","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2026-210622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Malignant effusion is a common manifestation of metastatic gastric cancer. This study compared the expression of key biomarkers (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b)) between malignant effusion-derived cell blocks (CBs) and matched primary or metastatic tumour tissues and evaluated the longitudinal concordance of biomarker expression in serially collected CBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biomarker status was retrospectively assessed by immunohistochemistry in CBs from malignant effusions and paired primary/metastatic gastric adenocarcinomas. HER2+ cases underwent fluorescence in situ hybridisation to confirm amplification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLDN18.2 showed the highest positivity rate (34.0%). PD-L1 expression was positive in 8.6% of tumours and 13.9% of stroma. Lower rates were observed for FGFR2b (3.8%) and HER2 (3.3%). FGFR2b positivity was more frequent in CBs than in primary tumours (p=0.044) with higher expression levels (p=0.02). Conversely, CLDN18.2 positivity was lower in CBs versus primary tumours (p=0.004). Metastatic lesions showed higher CLDN18.2 positivity (p=0.04) and expression levels (p=0.002) compared with CBs. Serial CB analysis revealed high concordance rates: FGFR2b (99.1%), HER2 (98.1%), tumour PD-L1 (94.8%) and CLDN18.2 (92.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Malignant effusion CBs show favourable intra-patient biomarker consistency over time, supporting their feasibility for longitudinal monitoring. Effusion-based testing shows potential value for potentially identifying candidates for FGFR2b-targeted therapies, pending further clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2026-210622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Malignant effusion is a common manifestation of metastatic gastric cancer. This study compared the expression of key biomarkers (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b)) between malignant effusion-derived cell blocks (CBs) and matched primary or metastatic tumour tissues and evaluated the longitudinal concordance of biomarker expression in serially collected CBs.

Methods: Biomarker status was retrospectively assessed by immunohistochemistry in CBs from malignant effusions and paired primary/metastatic gastric adenocarcinomas. HER2+ cases underwent fluorescence in situ hybridisation to confirm amplification.

Results: CLDN18.2 showed the highest positivity rate (34.0%). PD-L1 expression was positive in 8.6% of tumours and 13.9% of stroma. Lower rates were observed for FGFR2b (3.8%) and HER2 (3.3%). FGFR2b positivity was more frequent in CBs than in primary tumours (p=0.044) with higher expression levels (p=0.02). Conversely, CLDN18.2 positivity was lower in CBs versus primary tumours (p=0.004). Metastatic lesions showed higher CLDN18.2 positivity (p=0.04) and expression levels (p=0.002) compared with CBs. Serial CB analysis revealed high concordance rates: FGFR2b (99.1%), HER2 (98.1%), tumour PD-L1 (94.8%) and CLDN18.2 (92.2%).

Conclusions: Malignant effusion CBs show favourable intra-patient biomarker consistency over time, supporting their feasibility for longitudinal monitoring. Effusion-based testing shows potential value for potentially identifying candidates for FGFR2b-targeted therapies, pending further clinical validation.

恶性积液可作为晚期胃癌治疗相关生物标志物检测的可行来源。
目的:恶性积液是转移性胃癌的常见表现。本研究比较了关键生物标志物(人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)、程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)、claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2)和成纤维细胞生长因子受体2b (FGFR2b))在恶性积液源性细胞阻断(CBs)和匹配的原发或转移性肿瘤组织中的表达,并评估了连续收集的CBs中生物标志物表达的纵向一致性。方法:采用免疫组织化学方法回顾性评估来自恶性积液和配对原发性/转移性胃腺癌的CBs的生物标志物状态。HER2+病例进行荧光原位杂交以确认扩增。结果:CLDN18.2阳性率最高,为34.0%。PD-L1在8.6%的肿瘤和13.9%的间质中呈阳性表达。FGFR2b(3.8%)和HER2(3.3%)的发病率较低。FGFR2b阳性在CBs中比在原发肿瘤中更常见(p=0.044),表达水平更高(p=0.02)。相反,与原发性肿瘤相比,CBs中CLDN18.2阳性较低(p=0.004)。与CBs相比,转移灶中CLDN18.2阳性(p=0.04)和表达水平(p=0.002)较高。序列CB分析显示高一致性率:FGFR2b (99.1%), HER2(98.1%),肿瘤PD-L1(94.8%)和CLDN18.2(92.2%)。结论:随着时间的推移,恶性积液CBs显示出良好的患者内部生物标志物一致性,支持其纵向监测的可行性。基于积液的检测显示了潜在的fgfr2b靶向治疗候选者的潜在价值,有待进一步的临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书