Joint factor structure of self-reported cognitive and affective problems in a help-seeking population.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Johanna K Stenberg, Suoma E Saarni, Johanna Nukari, Jan-Henry Stenberg, Tom H Rosenström
{"title":"Joint factor structure of self-reported cognitive and affective problems in a help-seeking population.","authors":"Johanna K Stenberg, Suoma E Saarni, Johanna Nukari, Jan-Henry Stenberg, Tom H Rosenström","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2651921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-reported cognitive and affective complaints are crucial in diagnosing neuropsychiatric conditions like adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). While common, these complaints often reflect factors beyond measurable cognitive deficits, highlighting the need for validated assessment tools. This study uses a transdiagnostic approach to (1) explore factor models underlying self-reported cognitive and affective problems and (2) examine how these complaints relate to objective neuropsychological performance, aiming to improve clinical assessment and understanding.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from 808 adolescents and adults seeking support for self-perceived learning and co-occurring mental health challenges from the Finnish Rehabilitation Foundation between 2014 and 2021. Self-reported cognitive and affective (depression and anxiety) complaints were assessed with the Questionnaire of Learning and Mental Health Problems (KOMO), and neuropsychological test data were additionally obtained from a subgroup of 70 participants. The structure of cognitive and affective complaints and their correlations with neuropsychological test performance were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model best explaining the data included a general factor for affective complaints but correlated factors for cognitive complaints. In that model, transdiagnostic affective symptoms correlated more strongly with cognitive complaints (<i>r</i> = .36‒.72) than specific depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> = .05‒.10). Mathematics and visuospatial-visuomotor complaints showed the strongest negative associations with neuropsychological test performance, while attention-executive function complaints had unexpected positive associations with performance in several cognitive domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study replicates the transdiagnostic structure of affective problems and suggests that cognitive complaints do not fit a comparable general factor structure. Findings highlight the complexity of self-reported cognitive issues - particularly those related to attention and executive function - and underscore the need for comprehensive assessments that go beyond self-report measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2651921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Self-reported cognitive and affective complaints are crucial in diagnosing neuropsychiatric conditions like adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). While common, these complaints often reflect factors beyond measurable cognitive deficits, highlighting the need for validated assessment tools. This study uses a transdiagnostic approach to (1) explore factor models underlying self-reported cognitive and affective problems and (2) examine how these complaints relate to objective neuropsychological performance, aiming to improve clinical assessment and understanding.

Method: Data were collected from 808 adolescents and adults seeking support for self-perceived learning and co-occurring mental health challenges from the Finnish Rehabilitation Foundation between 2014 and 2021. Self-reported cognitive and affective (depression and anxiety) complaints were assessed with the Questionnaire of Learning and Mental Health Problems (KOMO), and neuropsychological test data were additionally obtained from a subgroup of 70 participants. The structure of cognitive and affective complaints and their correlations with neuropsychological test performance were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Results: The model best explaining the data included a general factor for affective complaints but correlated factors for cognitive complaints. In that model, transdiagnostic affective symptoms correlated more strongly with cognitive complaints (r = .36‒.72) than specific depressive symptoms (r = .05‒.10). Mathematics and visuospatial-visuomotor complaints showed the strongest negative associations with neuropsychological test performance, while attention-executive function complaints had unexpected positive associations with performance in several cognitive domains.

Conclusion: This study replicates the transdiagnostic structure of affective problems and suggests that cognitive complaints do not fit a comparable general factor structure. Findings highlight the complexity of self-reported cognitive issues - particularly those related to attention and executive function - and underscore the need for comprehensive assessments that go beyond self-report measures.

求助人群自我报告的认知和情感问题的联合因素结构
自我报告的认知和情感抱怨是诊断神经精神疾病如成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的关键。虽然常见,但这些抱怨往往反映了可测量的认知缺陷之外的因素,突出了对有效评估工具的需求。本研究采用跨诊断方法(1)探索自我报告的认知和情感问题的因素模型;(2)研究这些抱怨与客观神经心理学表现的关系,旨在提高临床评估和理解。方法:收集芬兰康复基金会2014年至2021年间808名寻求自我感知学习和共同发生的心理健康挑战支持的青少年和成年人的数据。使用学习和心理健康问题问卷(KOMO)评估自我报告的认知和情感(抑郁和焦虑)投诉,并从70名参与者的亚组中获得神经心理测试数据。认知和情感抱怨的结构及其与神经心理测试成绩的相关性采用探索性和验证性因素分析。结果:最能解释数据的模型包括情感抱怨的一般因素和认知抱怨的相关因素。在该模型中,与特定抑郁症状(r = 0.05 - 0.10)相比,跨诊断情感症状与认知抱怨的相关性更强(r = 0.36 - 0.72)。数学和视觉空间-视觉运动抱怨与神经心理测试成绩表现出最强的负相关,而注意-执行功能抱怨与几个认知领域的表现表现出意想不到的正相关。结论:本研究重复了情感问题的跨诊断结构,表明认知抱怨不符合可比的一般因素结构。研究结果强调了自我报告的认知问题的复杂性,特别是那些与注意力和执行功能有关的问题,并强调了在自我报告测量之外进行全面评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书