Machine Learning Better Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nora Galoustian, Jeffrey Balian, Christopher David Hamad, Armin Alipour, Peyman Benharash, Alexander B. Christ, Alexandra Stavrakis
{"title":"Machine Learning Better Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection","authors":"Nora Galoustian,&nbsp;Jeffrey Balian,&nbsp;Christopher David Hamad,&nbsp;Armin Alipour,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash,&nbsp;Alexander B. Christ,&nbsp;Alexandra Stavrakis","doi":"10.1002/jor.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with a 25% 5-year mortality. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) is a novel machine learning technique used in other surgical specialties to better predict outcomes, but has never been utilized in the field of orthopedics. This is the first study utilizing machine learning (ML) and SMOTE to predict the greatest risk factors for mortality following revision THA for PJI. This retrospective study utilized the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify adult patients undergoing revision THA for PJI. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, Brier score, and F1 score, with SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis identifying key predictors. Among 19,099 patients undergoing revision THA for PJI, there was a 0.8% mortality rate. Logistic regression (AUROC 0.855) and gradient boosting (AUROC 0.862) outperformed random forest (AUROC 0.765), with gradient boosting demonstrating the highest F1 score (0.257). Following the application SMOTE, all models demonstrated improved AUROC, model calibration, and enhanced F1. SHAP analysis identified fluid and electrolyte disorders, advancing age, and cardiac arrhythmia as key predictors of mortality. This study is the first in the field of orthopedics to utilize SMOTE and subsequently introduces a novel, streamlined risk score that identifies high-risk patients undergoing revision THA for PJI. Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities were the strongest predictors of mortality. Given the established link between high-dose antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers and calcium sulfate antibiotic impregnated beads with AKI and subsequent electrolyte disturbances, optimizing electrolyte levels perioperatively may be a mortality-reducing intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.70197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with a 25% 5-year mortality. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) is a novel machine learning technique used in other surgical specialties to better predict outcomes, but has never been utilized in the field of orthopedics. This is the first study utilizing machine learning (ML) and SMOTE to predict the greatest risk factors for mortality following revision THA for PJI. This retrospective study utilized the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify adult patients undergoing revision THA for PJI. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, Brier score, and F1 score, with SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis identifying key predictors. Among 19,099 patients undergoing revision THA for PJI, there was a 0.8% mortality rate. Logistic regression (AUROC 0.855) and gradient boosting (AUROC 0.862) outperformed random forest (AUROC 0.765), with gradient boosting demonstrating the highest F1 score (0.257). Following the application SMOTE, all models demonstrated improved AUROC, model calibration, and enhanced F1. SHAP analysis identified fluid and electrolyte disorders, advancing age, and cardiac arrhythmia as key predictors of mortality. This study is the first in the field of orthopedics to utilize SMOTE and subsequently introduces a novel, streamlined risk score that identifies high-risk patients undergoing revision THA for PJI. Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities were the strongest predictors of mortality. Given the established link between high-dose antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers and calcium sulfate antibiotic impregnated beads with AKI and subsequent electrolyte disturbances, optimizing electrolyte levels perioperatively may be a mortality-reducing intervention.

机器学习更好地预测假体周围关节感染患者翻修全髋关节置换术的死亡率。
全髋关节置换术(THA)后假体周围关节感染(PJI)与25%的5年死亡率相关。合成少数派过采样技术(SMOTE)是一种新型的机器学习技术,用于其他外科专业,以更好地预测结果,但从未在骨科领域使用。这是第一个利用机器学习(ML)和SMOTE预测PJI修订THA后死亡的最大危险因素的研究。这项回顾性研究利用全国再入院数据库来识别因PJI接受翻修THA的成年患者。采用AUROC、Brier评分和F1评分对模型性能进行评估,并用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析确定关键预测因子。在19099例因PJI而接受改良THA的患者中,死亡率为0.8%。Logistic回归(AUROC 0.855)和梯度增强(AUROC 0.862)优于随机森林(AUROC 0.765),其中梯度增强的F1得分最高(0.257)。在应用SMOTE之后,所有模型都显示了改进的AUROC、模型校准和增强的F1。SHAP分析发现体液和电解质紊乱、年龄增长和心律失常是死亡率的主要预测因素。这项研究是骨科领域首次使用SMOTE,随后引入了一种新颖的、简化的风险评分,用于识别接受PJI翻修THA的高危患者。体液和电解质异常是死亡率最强的预测因子。鉴于高剂量载抗生素骨水泥间隔剂和硫酸钙抗生素浸渍珠与AKI和随后的电解质紊乱之间建立的联系,优化围手术期电解质水平可能是一种降低死亡率的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书