Ding Quan Ng, Matthew Heshmatipour, Julia Trudeau, Apeksha Sridhar, Brock Pluimer, Olivia G G Drayson, Sayeh M Lavasani, Ritesh Parajuli, Sanghoon Lee, Anshu Agrawal, Munjal M Acharya, Charles L Limoli, Richard E Harris, Lifang Xie, Shaista Malik, Alexandre Chan
{"title":"Electroacupuncture improves cognitive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ding Quan Ng, Matthew Heshmatipour, Julia Trudeau, Apeksha Sridhar, Brock Pluimer, Olivia G G Drayson, Sayeh M Lavasani, Ritesh Parajuli, Sanghoon Lee, Anshu Agrawal, Munjal M Acharya, Charles L Limoli, Richard E Harris, Lifang Xie, Shaista Malik, Alexandre Chan","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djag096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a randomized, double-blinded pilot trial to compare the impact of two electroacupuncture (EA) regimens on co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms among breast cancer survivors (BCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BCS who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sEA) acupoints. Primary endpoints were the within-group pre-post effect sizes (Glass's Δ) in symptom severities, adjusted for multiple comparisons (p-adjusted). Outcomes were assessed using neurocognitive tests (CANTAB®), PROs (FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF, EORTC QLQ-C30), plasma biomarkers, and neuroimaging. Responders were defined by reliable change index (for objective cognition) or MCID (for PROs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five were recruited, with 30 (86%) completing all sessions. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2 (±12.2) years, and 86% reported co-occurring symptoms. Following treatment, the nEA group demonstrated significant improvements in attention (T3: Δ = 0.562, T4: Δ = 0.708, both p-adjusted < 0.05) and distress (T3: Δ = 0.764, T4: Δ = 0.711, both p-adjusted < 0.05). More responders were observed after nEA treatment for objective cognition (42.9% vs 12.5%) and distress (50% vs 37.5%). nEA-treated participants showed increased gray matter volume compared to sEA (p = 0.033), which positively correlated with better attention function (r = 0.69, p = 0.020). nEA-related improvements in memory and response speed were associated with reduced connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN-SFG, r=-0.93, p < 0.01) and increased connectivity in the Dorsal Attention Network (DAN-SMG, r = 0.86, p < 0.001), respectively. All adverse events were grade 2 or lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EA targeting neuropsychiatric-specific acupoints suggests improvements in cognition and distress symptoms in BCS, warranting validation in larger, multicenter trials.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: </strong>NCT05283577.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded pilot trial to compare the impact of two electroacupuncture (EA) regimens on co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms among breast cancer survivors (BCS).
Methods: BCS who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sEA) acupoints. Primary endpoints were the within-group pre-post effect sizes (Glass's Δ) in symptom severities, adjusted for multiple comparisons (p-adjusted). Outcomes were assessed using neurocognitive tests (CANTAB®), PROs (FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF, EORTC QLQ-C30), plasma biomarkers, and neuroimaging. Responders were defined by reliable change index (for objective cognition) or MCID (for PROs).
Results: Thirty-five were recruited, with 30 (86%) completing all sessions. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2 (±12.2) years, and 86% reported co-occurring symptoms. Following treatment, the nEA group demonstrated significant improvements in attention (T3: Δ = 0.562, T4: Δ = 0.708, both p-adjusted < 0.05) and distress (T3: Δ = 0.764, T4: Δ = 0.711, both p-adjusted < 0.05). More responders were observed after nEA treatment for objective cognition (42.9% vs 12.5%) and distress (50% vs 37.5%). nEA-treated participants showed increased gray matter volume compared to sEA (p = 0.033), which positively correlated with better attention function (r = 0.69, p = 0.020). nEA-related improvements in memory and response speed were associated with reduced connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN-SFG, r=-0.93, p < 0.01) and increased connectivity in the Dorsal Attention Network (DAN-SMG, r = 0.86, p < 0.001), respectively. All adverse events were grade 2 or lower.
Conclusions: EA targeting neuropsychiatric-specific acupoints suggests improvements in cognition and distress symptoms in BCS, warranting validation in larger, multicenter trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.