Evaluation of nurses' knowledge and practices in healthcare-associated infections management following clinical pharmacist-led training in a Romanian clinical hospital using a questionnaire.

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sándor Szabó, Adina Popa, Andra Diana Coman, Cecilia Cristea
{"title":"Evaluation of nurses' knowledge and practices in healthcare-associated infections management following clinical pharmacist-led training in a Romanian clinical hospital using a questionnaire.","authors":"Sándor Szabó, Adina Popa, Andra Diana Coman, Cecilia Cristea","doi":"10.1177/17571774261440771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Romania has one of the highest rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in Europe. Nurses need strong theoretical and practical knowledge to manage HAIs effectively since they have direct contact with patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate post-intervention differences in nurses' theoretical knowledge and practical skills in HAIs management following clinical pharmacist-led training, a newly developed questionnaire was applied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quasi-experimental, non-randomised study with a test and a control group. A structured 17-item questionnaire was developed and delivered via Microsoft Forms. Participants comprised nurses from the study hospital (test; <i>n</i> = 66) and a similar setting outside the hospital (control; <i>n</i> = 102). The test group completed the questionnaire twice, first after a face-to-face training provided by a clinical pharmacist, and second at 4 weeks. The control group received no training and completed the same questionnaire once. We explored preliminary content and structural validity, internal consistency, and short-term post-intervention stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 nurses completed the questionnaire: 66 in the test group and 102 in the control group. Practical skills scores were higher in the test group (M = 4.73, SD = 0.42) compared with the control group (M = 4.16, SD = 0.88), F (1,126) = 5.20, <i>p</i> = .02. Psychometric evaluation provided preliminary evidence of acceptable validity and internal consistency of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The observed post-intervention differences suggest that participation in the training was associated with higher practical skills scores. Limitations include the non-randomised design and self-report measures; future work should assess long-term retention beyond 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"17571774261440771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13038481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774261440771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Romania has one of the highest rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in Europe. Nurses need strong theoretical and practical knowledge to manage HAIs effectively since they have direct contact with patients.

Objective: To evaluate post-intervention differences in nurses' theoretical knowledge and practical skills in HAIs management following clinical pharmacist-led training, a newly developed questionnaire was applied.

Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental, non-randomised study with a test and a control group. A structured 17-item questionnaire was developed and delivered via Microsoft Forms. Participants comprised nurses from the study hospital (test; n = 66) and a similar setting outside the hospital (control; n = 102). The test group completed the questionnaire twice, first after a face-to-face training provided by a clinical pharmacist, and second at 4 weeks. The control group received no training and completed the same questionnaire once. We explored preliminary content and structural validity, internal consistency, and short-term post-intervention stability.

Results: A total of 168 nurses completed the questionnaire: 66 in the test group and 102 in the control group. Practical skills scores were higher in the test group (M = 4.73, SD = 0.42) compared with the control group (M = 4.16, SD = 0.88), F (1,126) = 5.20, p = .02. Psychometric evaluation provided preliminary evidence of acceptable validity and internal consistency of the questionnaire.

Discussion: The observed post-intervention differences suggest that participation in the training was associated with higher practical skills scores. Limitations include the non-randomised design and self-report measures; future work should assess long-term retention beyond 4 weeks.

在罗马尼亚一家临床医院进行临床药师主导的培训后,使用问卷对护士在医疗保健相关感染管理方面的知识和做法进行评估。
背景:罗马尼亚是欧洲卫生保健相关感染率最高的国家之一。护士与患者有直接接触,因此需要扎实的理论和实践知识才能有效地管理卫生保健服务。目的:采用新设计的问卷调查方法,评估临床药师培训后护士在健康照护管理方面的理论知识和实践技能的差异。方法:我们进行了一项准实验、非随机研究,包括一个试验组和一个对照组。一份包含17个项目的结构化问卷通过Microsoft Forms进行了开发和交付。参与者包括来自研究医院(测试,n = 66)和医院外类似环境的护士(对照,n = 102)。实验组完成两次问卷,第一次是在临床药师提供面对面培训后,第二次是在4周后。对照组不接受任何培训,完成相同的问卷一次。我们探讨了初步内容和结构效度、内部一致性和短期干预后稳定性。结果:共168名护士完成问卷,实验组66名,对照组102名。试验组学生实践技能得分(M = 4.73, SD = 0.42)高于对照组(M = 4.16, SD = 0.88), F (1126) = 5.20, p = 0.02。心理测量评估为问卷的可接受效度和内部一致性提供了初步证据。讨论:观察到的干预后差异表明,参加培训与更高的实用技能得分有关。局限性包括非随机设计和自我报告测量;未来的工作应评估超过4周的长期保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书