EVALUATION OF 100% VERSUS 21% OXYGEN SUPPLEMENTATION IN COMMON SNAPPING TURTLES (CHELYDRA SERPENTINA) ANESTHETIZED WITH ALFAXALONE.

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Molly E Martony, Shawn McMahon, James Bailey, Lindsay Bosworth, Laura Thompson, Julie A Balko
{"title":"EVALUATION OF 100% VERSUS 21% OXYGEN SUPPLEMENTATION IN COMMON SNAPPING TURTLES (<i>CHELYDRA SERPENTINA</i>) ANESTHETIZED WITH ALFAXALONE.","authors":"Molly E Martony, Shawn McMahon, James Bailey, Lindsay Bosworth, Laura Thompson, Julie A Balko","doi":"10.1638/2025-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In reptiles, respiration differs from that in mammals, with hypoxia rather than hypercapnia driving ventilation. Although veterinarians have anecdotally limited 100% oxygen supplementation in reptile anesthesia to mitigate respiratory depression and, theoretically, avoid prolonged anesthetic recovery, data to support this practice are lacking. The study objective is a comparison of supplementation with 100% versus 21% oxygen on anesthetic and cardiorespiratory parameters of 10 healthy, spontaneously ventilating common snapping turtles (<i>Chelydra serpentina</i>) anesthetized with alfaxalone. Using a randomized, complete crossover design with a 1-wk interval between treatments, turtles were administered alfaxalone (8 mg/kg IM), intubated, and supplemented with either 21% oxygen (room air) or 100% oxygen (1 L/min). Anesthetic timing (initial effect, intubation, extubation, recovery), venous blood gas data (baseline, 40 min, recovery) and serial physiologic variables (heart and respiratory rates, temperature, inhaled and exhaled gas concentrations, anesthetic depth) were compared between groups. Times to initial effect and intubation, and cumulative anesthetic depth scores were not significantly different between groups. In all turtles, sustained increase in heart rate and transient increase in respiratory rate were observed following alfaxalone administration and were not significantly different between groups. Respiratory rate for the remainder of the anesthesia was not significantly different between groups. Median (range) time to extubation (21%: 100 [90-126] min, 100%: 100 [69-116] min) and time to recovery (21%: 118 [100-130] min, 100%: 115 [85-130] min) were not significantly different between groups. Mean ± SD partial pressure of oxygen in venous blood was significantly higher with supplementation of 100% (104.5 ± 36.0 mm Hg) compared with 21% (35.8 ± 7.0 mm Hg) oxygen (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Supplementation with 100% oxygen did not decrease respiratory rate or delay anesthetic recovery time and resulted in significantly greater blood oxygen concentrations in alfaxalone-anesthetized juvenile snapping turtles, supporting the use of 100% oxygen supplementation during chelonian anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"157-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2025-0083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reptiles, respiration differs from that in mammals, with hypoxia rather than hypercapnia driving ventilation. Although veterinarians have anecdotally limited 100% oxygen supplementation in reptile anesthesia to mitigate respiratory depression and, theoretically, avoid prolonged anesthetic recovery, data to support this practice are lacking. The study objective is a comparison of supplementation with 100% versus 21% oxygen on anesthetic and cardiorespiratory parameters of 10 healthy, spontaneously ventilating common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) anesthetized with alfaxalone. Using a randomized, complete crossover design with a 1-wk interval between treatments, turtles were administered alfaxalone (8 mg/kg IM), intubated, and supplemented with either 21% oxygen (room air) or 100% oxygen (1 L/min). Anesthetic timing (initial effect, intubation, extubation, recovery), venous blood gas data (baseline, 40 min, recovery) and serial physiologic variables (heart and respiratory rates, temperature, inhaled and exhaled gas concentrations, anesthetic depth) were compared between groups. Times to initial effect and intubation, and cumulative anesthetic depth scores were not significantly different between groups. In all turtles, sustained increase in heart rate and transient increase in respiratory rate were observed following alfaxalone administration and were not significantly different between groups. Respiratory rate for the remainder of the anesthesia was not significantly different between groups. Median (range) time to extubation (21%: 100 [90-126] min, 100%: 100 [69-116] min) and time to recovery (21%: 118 [100-130] min, 100%: 115 [85-130] min) were not significantly different between groups. Mean ± SD partial pressure of oxygen in venous blood was significantly higher with supplementation of 100% (104.5 ± 36.0 mm Hg) compared with 21% (35.8 ± 7.0 mm Hg) oxygen (P < 0.01). Supplementation with 100% oxygen did not decrease respiratory rate or delay anesthetic recovery time and resulted in significantly greater blood oxygen concentrations in alfaxalone-anesthetized juvenile snapping turtles, supporting the use of 100% oxygen supplementation during chelonian anesthesia.

阿法索龙麻醉下普通鳄龟(chelydra serpentina) 100%和21%氧补充的评价。
爬行动物的呼吸不同于哺乳动物,是缺氧而不是高碳酸血症驱动通气。虽然兽医在爬行动物麻醉时限制100%的氧气补充以减轻呼吸抑制,理论上避免麻醉恢复时间延长,但缺乏支持这种做法的数据。本研究的目的是比较10只健康的、能自主呼吸的普通鳄龟(Chelydra serpentina)在阿法索龙麻醉下,100%和21%的氧气对麻醉和心肺参数的影响。采用随机、完全交叉设计,两次治疗间隔1周,给海龟注射阿尔法霉素(8mg /kg IM),插管,并补充21%的氧气(室内空气)或100%的氧气(1l /min)。比较两组麻醉时间(初始效果、插管、拔管、恢复)、静脉血气数据(基线、40分钟、恢复)和一系列生理变量(心脏和呼吸速率、温度、吸入和呼出气体浓度、麻醉深度)。两组间初效、插管次数及麻醉深度累积评分无显著差异。在所有海龟中,给药后心率持续增加,呼吸频率短暂增加,组间无显著差异。麻醉剩余时间呼吸率组间无显著差异。拔管时间中位数(范围)(21%:100 [90-126]min, 100%: 100 [69-116] min)和恢复时间(21%:118 [100-130]min, 100%: 115 [85-130] min)组间无显著差异。添加100%(104.5±36.0 mm Hg)氧组静脉血氧分压平均值±SD显著高于添加21%(35.8±7.0 mm Hg)氧组(P < 0.01)。补充100%氧气不会降低呼吸频率或延迟麻醉恢复时间,并导致阿法沙酮麻醉的幼鳄龟血氧浓度显著升高,支持在龟腹麻醉期间使用100%氧气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers. The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution. Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书