Sighting dominance, retinal nerve fiber layer and macula; are they related? - An ocular dominance analysis study.

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_145_24
Roshni Robert, Mahesh Babu, Krishnendu Unnikannan, Konatham Shruthi
{"title":"Sighting dominance, retinal nerve fiber layer and macula; are they related? - An ocular dominance analysis study.","authors":"Roshni Robert, Mahesh Babu, Krishnendu Unnikannan, Konatham Shruthi","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_145_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to study ocular dominance and its association with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 432 participants with nonpathological eyes. We determined the ocular dominance by the hole-in-card test (Dolman method). A comprehensive eye examination was conducted on the participants, including best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and anterior and posterior segment examination. The RNFL thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography. The findings were analyzed using paired <i>t</i>-tests to compare between dominant and nondominant eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 432 participants, 70.4% (304) showed right eye dominance of study population had right eye dominance. The average RNFL (AvRNFL) thickness showed a small but significantly higher value in dominant eyes compared to nondominant eyes. We found significantly higher RNFL thickness in temporal, inferior and nasal quadrants in dominant eyes compared to nondominant eyes. Age had minimal effect on the difference in AvRNFL thickness between dominant and nondominant eyes (<i>P</i> = 0.144). There was no significant difference in macular retinal thickness between the eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ocular dominance was found predominantly in the right eye. The dominant eye showed greater AvRNFL thickness compared to nondominant eye. AvRNFL, inferior RNFL, Nasal RNFL, Temporal RNFL thickness were greater in the dominant eye compared to the nondominant eye. There was no difference in macular thickness. Our findings suggest the need to consider dominance in various disease entities, in clinical decision making and normative data particularly concerning retinal nerve fiber layer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"19 1","pages":"54-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13043111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_145_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to study ocular dominance and its association with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 432 participants with nonpathological eyes. We determined the ocular dominance by the hole-in-card test (Dolman method). A comprehensive eye examination was conducted on the participants, including best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and anterior and posterior segment examination. The RNFL thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography. The findings were analyzed using paired t-tests to compare between dominant and nondominant eyes.

Results: Out of the 432 participants, 70.4% (304) showed right eye dominance of study population had right eye dominance. The average RNFL (AvRNFL) thickness showed a small but significantly higher value in dominant eyes compared to nondominant eyes. We found significantly higher RNFL thickness in temporal, inferior and nasal quadrants in dominant eyes compared to nondominant eyes. Age had minimal effect on the difference in AvRNFL thickness between dominant and nondominant eyes (P = 0.144). There was no significant difference in macular retinal thickness between the eyes.

Conclusions: Ocular dominance was found predominantly in the right eye. The dominant eye showed greater AvRNFL thickness compared to nondominant eye. AvRNFL, inferior RNFL, Nasal RNFL, Temporal RNFL thickness were greater in the dominant eye compared to the nondominant eye. There was no difference in macular thickness. Our findings suggest the need to consider dominance in various disease entities, in clinical decision making and normative data particularly concerning retinal nerve fiber layer.

视优势、视网膜神经纤维层及黄斑;他们有亲戚关系吗?-眼优势分析研究。
目的:研究眼优势及其与视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)和黄斑厚度的关系。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对432名非病理眼患者进行研究。我们通过卡片入洞试验(Dolman法)确定眼优势。对参与者进行全面的眼科检查,包括最佳矫正视力、眼压、前、后节检查。采用光学相干层析测量RNFL厚度。研究结果使用配对t检验来比较优势眼和非优势眼之间的差异。结果:在432名参与者中,70.4%(304人)表现为右眼优势,研究人群中有右眼优势。优势眼的平均RNFL厚度虽小,但显著高于非优势眼。我们发现优势眼的颞、下和鼻象限的RNFL厚度明显高于非优势眼。年龄对优势眼和非优势眼AvRNFL厚度差异影响最小(P = 0.144)。两眼间黄斑视网膜厚度无显著差异。结论:以右眼为主。优势眼AvRNFL厚度大于非优势眼。上、下、鼻、颞RNFL厚度在优势眼大于非优势眼。黄斑厚度无明显差异。我们的研究结果表明,需要考虑在各种疾病实体中的优势,在临床决策和规范性数据,特别是有关视网膜神经纤维层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书