Applying a process mapping methodology to identify barriers and facilitators to social needs screener and medical-legal partnership integration into primary care facilities.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10705
Jamelia D Graham, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Sophia Allen, Medha Makhlouf, Nehath Sheriff, Josheili Llavona-Ortiz, William A Calo
{"title":"Applying a process mapping methodology to identify barriers and facilitators to social needs screener and medical-legal partnership integration into primary care facilities.","authors":"Jamelia D Graham, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Sophia Allen, Medha Makhlouf, Nehath Sheriff, Josheili Llavona-Ortiz, William A Calo","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care providers understand the importance of collecting social needs screener (SNS) information from patients. Gathering this information permits more comprehensive, patient-centered care plans and allows primary care settings to serve as a hub where patients can receive resources and referrals to address their social needs. Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) are a legal intervention that can also connect patients to social services. However, barriers exist that prevent full integration of SNS and MLPs. This study aims to understand how best to integrate SNS and MLPs into primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), an idealized process map and semi-structured interview guide were developed to facilitate interviews with primary care providers. The process map included four \"swim lanes,\" including planning, patient-provider interaction, referrals, and MLPs. Eleven primary care providers from three different health systems were interviewed in January-March 2025. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data were coded inductively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven themes were identified from the interviews, including review and adaptation of SNS should be regular, involvement of providers and staff is necessary for SNS integration, cross-disciplinary training, physical space, and information technology is needed to promote MLP, and identification of local resources for social need referrals is critical for providers' buy-in. These themes were matched to constructs from CFIR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNS and MLPs can be integrated into the clinical workflow, but external factors may negate the impacts of SNS success and MLP referrals. By addressing the barriers identified using implementation strategies, integration of SNS and MLPs into primary care can be more feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13040392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary care providers understand the importance of collecting social needs screener (SNS) information from patients. Gathering this information permits more comprehensive, patient-centered care plans and allows primary care settings to serve as a hub where patients can receive resources and referrals to address their social needs. Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) are a legal intervention that can also connect patients to social services. However, barriers exist that prevent full integration of SNS and MLPs. This study aims to understand how best to integrate SNS and MLPs into primary care.

Methods: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), an idealized process map and semi-structured interview guide were developed to facilitate interviews with primary care providers. The process map included four "swim lanes," including planning, patient-provider interaction, referrals, and MLPs. Eleven primary care providers from three different health systems were interviewed in January-March 2025. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data were coded inductively.

Results: Eleven themes were identified from the interviews, including review and adaptation of SNS should be regular, involvement of providers and staff is necessary for SNS integration, cross-disciplinary training, physical space, and information technology is needed to promote MLP, and identification of local resources for social need referrals is critical for providers' buy-in. These themes were matched to constructs from CFIR.

Conclusion: SNS and MLPs can be integrated into the clinical workflow, but external factors may negate the impacts of SNS success and MLP referrals. By addressing the barriers identified using implementation strategies, integration of SNS and MLPs into primary care can be more feasible.

采用流程绘图方法,确定社会需求筛选和医疗-法律伙伴关系纳入初级保健设施的障碍和促进因素。
背景:初级保健提供者了解从患者收集社会需求筛查(SNS)信息的重要性。收集这些信息有助于制定更全面、以患者为中心的护理计划,并使初级保健机构成为一个中心,患者可以在这里获得资源和转诊,以解决他们的社会需求。医疗-法律伙伴关系(mlp)是一种法律干预,也可以将患者与社会服务联系起来。然而,阻碍SNS和mlp完全整合的障碍依然存在。本研究旨在了解如何最好地将社交网络和mlp纳入初级保健。方法:在实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的指导下,制定了一个理想化的流程图和半结构化的访谈指南,以方便对初级保健提供者的访谈。流程图包括四条“泳道”,包括计划、医患互动、转诊和mlp。在2025年1月至3月期间,对来自三个不同卫生系统的11名初级保健提供者进行了访谈。访谈被记录下来,逐字抄写,数据被归纳编码。结果:从访谈中确定了11个主题,包括应定期审查和适应SNS,提供者和工作人员的参与是SNS整合的必要条件,跨学科培训,物理空间和信息技术需要促进MLP,以及确定当地资源用于社会需求转介对于提供者的购买至关重要。这些主题与CFIR的结构相匹配。结论:SNS和MLP可以整合到临床工作流程中,但外部因素可能会对SNS成功和MLP转诊产生负面影响。通过解决使用实施战略确定的障碍,将SNS和mlp整合到初级保健中可以更加可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书