"I want to see everything": A community-based participatory research framework to identify eye health and vision care knowledge, perceptions, values, and barriers.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10698
Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Sara Kennedy, Tyler A West, Kendall R Pixley, Andrea R Waksmunski, Kaitlyn L Funk, Leslie V Castaneda, Leslie Richards, Leah Cummings, Bridget Croniger Ockunzzi, Renee A Laux, Briana L McIntosh, Earl Pike, Erika S Trapl, Jessica N Cooke Bailey
{"title":"\"I want to see everything\": A community-based participatory research framework to identify eye health and vision care knowledge, perceptions, values, and barriers.","authors":"Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Sara Kennedy, Tyler A West, Kendall R Pixley, Andrea R Waksmunski, Kaitlyn L Funk, Leslie V Castaneda, Leslie Richards, Leah Cummings, Bridget Croniger Ockunzzi, Renee A Laux, Briana L McIntosh, Earl Pike, Erika S Trapl, Jessica N Cooke Bailey","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vision impairment disproportionately affects individuals from low-income and African American communities, yet underutilization of preventive eye care persists. We conducted a community-based participatory research (CBPR) study to explore perceptions, values, and barriers related to vision care in an underserved urban neighborhood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In partnership with University Settlement, a trusted community center in Cleveland, Ohio, and a study-specific Community Advisory Board (CAB), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 60 adult residents of the Broadway-Slavic Village neighborhood. Thematic analysis identified key facilitators and barriers to accessing vision care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants across racial groups described vision as highly important and often endorsed more frequent preventive eye care than they reported receiving. Barriers to eye care utilization included cost, inadequate insurance coverage, transportation challenges, fear of diagnosis, and limited awareness of preventive benefits. Distinct differences emerged in insurance type and visit frequency between African American and White participants despite comparable socioeconomic status. Participants identified community-specific solutions such as free or low-cost exams, mobile clinics, transportation support, and increased education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that underutilization of eye care reflects structural and systemic barriers rather than lack of motivation. System-level interventions that integrate screenings into clinical and community settings, streamline referral pathways, and reduce logistical burdens are needed to facilitate equitable access to vision care. Embedding data collection in a trusted community setting surfaced perspectives from individuals who may be absent from clinic-based or online research and provides a model for translational research addressing health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13040302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vision impairment disproportionately affects individuals from low-income and African American communities, yet underutilization of preventive eye care persists. We conducted a community-based participatory research (CBPR) study to explore perceptions, values, and barriers related to vision care in an underserved urban neighborhood.

Methods: In partnership with University Settlement, a trusted community center in Cleveland, Ohio, and a study-specific Community Advisory Board (CAB), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 60 adult residents of the Broadway-Slavic Village neighborhood. Thematic analysis identified key facilitators and barriers to accessing vision care.

Results: Participants across racial groups described vision as highly important and often endorsed more frequent preventive eye care than they reported receiving. Barriers to eye care utilization included cost, inadequate insurance coverage, transportation challenges, fear of diagnosis, and limited awareness of preventive benefits. Distinct differences emerged in insurance type and visit frequency between African American and White participants despite comparable socioeconomic status. Participants identified community-specific solutions such as free or low-cost exams, mobile clinics, transportation support, and increased education.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that underutilization of eye care reflects structural and systemic barriers rather than lack of motivation. System-level interventions that integrate screenings into clinical and community settings, streamline referral pathways, and reduce logistical burdens are needed to facilitate equitable access to vision care. Embedding data collection in a trusted community setting surfaced perspectives from individuals who may be absent from clinic-based or online research and provides a model for translational research addressing health disparities.

“我想看到一切”:一个以社区为基础的参与性研究框架,旨在确定眼睛健康和视力保健知识、观念、价值观和障碍。
导读:低收入人群和非裔美国人社区的视力损害比例过高,但预防性眼科保健的利用仍然不足。我们进行了一项以社区为基础的参与性研究(CBPR)研究,以探索在服务不足的城市社区中与视力保健相关的观念、价值观和障碍。方法:我们与俄亥俄州克利夫兰的一个值得信赖的社区中心——大学定居区(University Settlement)和一个专门研究的社区咨询委员会(CAB)合作,对百老汇-斯拉夫村附近的60名成年居民进行了半结构化访谈。专题分析确定了获得视力保健的主要促进因素和障碍。结果:不同种族的参与者将视力描述为非常重要的,并且通常比他们报告的接受更频繁的预防性眼睛护理。利用眼科保健的障碍包括费用、保险覆盖面不足、交通困难、害怕诊断以及对预防福利的认识有限。尽管社会经济地位相当,但非洲裔美国人和白人参与者在保险类型和访问频率上出现了明显差异。与会者确定了针对社区的解决方案,如免费或低成本的检查、流动诊所、交通支持和增加教育。结论:我们的研究结果表明,眼科保健利用不足反映的是结构性和系统性障碍,而不是缺乏动机。需要将筛查纳入临床和社区环境、简化转诊途径和减轻后勤负担的系统级干预措施,以促进公平获得视力保健。在可信任的社区环境中嵌入数据收集,可以从可能缺席临床或在线研究的个人的角度来看问题,并为解决健康差异的转化研究提供了一个模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书