A Qualitative Study of a Pilot of Clinician Perspectives on the Delivery of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits for Patients with Dementia in an Academic Health Science Center in Texas.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329261432894
Huey-Ming Tzeng, Yong-Fang Kuo, Monique R Pappadis, Elizabeth A Hennessy, Maribel M Marquez-Bhojani, Samuel V David, Elise Passy, Mukaila A Raji
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of a Pilot of Clinician Perspectives on the Delivery of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits for Patients with Dementia in an Academic Health Science Center in Texas.","authors":"Huey-Ming Tzeng, Yong-Fang Kuo, Monique R Pappadis, Elizabeth A Hennessy, Maribel M Marquez-Bhojani, Samuel V David, Elise Passy, Mukaila A Raji","doi":"10.1177/11786329261432894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about clinicians' perspectives on the process and outcomes of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) in Medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought clinicians' opinions on the impact of AWVs on health outcomes and disparity reduction for beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Institute for Healthcare Improvement's 4Ms framework of an age-friendly health system informed the design of this qualitative study of a pilot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used convenience sampling and recruited clinicians from a single academic-health-science center's catchment area in Texas, who billed for at least 1 AWV to participate in a one-time, one-on-one, semi-structured interview conducted via phone/Zoom. Participants verbally agreed to participate. This study met the federal regulations for a Quality Assessment project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 26 clinicians (17 female; 26 non-Hispanic, 12 White, 10 Asian, 4 Black; 16 in family medicine and 5 in internal medicine). Most agreed AWVs improve health outcomes (n = 23, 88.5%) and reduce health disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD (n = 20, 76.9%). The top three \"what works\" themes were: (1) non-primary care providers (eg, wellness nurses) streamline AWV delivery by screening patients, providing resources/support, and sharing abnormal findings with primary care providers (PCPs); (2) PCPs do AWVs themselves to be in alignment with issues identified; and (3) sufficient time allotted to learn what matters most to patients and caregivers. The top three \"what does not work\" themes were: (1) clinicians desire having a family caregiver present; (2) clinicians need the full hour for in-depth screenings and holistic care; and (3) clinics need on-site social workers to address nonmedical issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians agreed that AWVs helped improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities. Tailoring AWV components by MCI/ADRD stage will optimize the visit, maximize health outcomes, and decrease disparities in access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"19 ","pages":"11786329261432894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13039569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329261432894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about clinicians' perspectives on the process and outcomes of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) in Medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD).

Objectives: We sought clinicians' opinions on the impact of AWVs on health outcomes and disparity reduction for beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD.

Design: Institute for Healthcare Improvement's 4Ms framework of an age-friendly health system informed the design of this qualitative study of a pilot.

Methods: We used convenience sampling and recruited clinicians from a single academic-health-science center's catchment area in Texas, who billed for at least 1 AWV to participate in a one-time, one-on-one, semi-structured interview conducted via phone/Zoom. Participants verbally agreed to participate. This study met the federal regulations for a Quality Assessment project.

Results: We interviewed 26 clinicians (17 female; 26 non-Hispanic, 12 White, 10 Asian, 4 Black; 16 in family medicine and 5 in internal medicine). Most agreed AWVs improve health outcomes (n = 23, 88.5%) and reduce health disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD (n = 20, 76.9%). The top three "what works" themes were: (1) non-primary care providers (eg, wellness nurses) streamline AWV delivery by screening patients, providing resources/support, and sharing abnormal findings with primary care providers (PCPs); (2) PCPs do AWVs themselves to be in alignment with issues identified; and (3) sufficient time allotted to learn what matters most to patients and caregivers. The top three "what does not work" themes were: (1) clinicians desire having a family caregiver present; (2) clinicians need the full hour for in-depth screenings and holistic care; and (3) clinics need on-site social workers to address nonmedical issues.

Conclusions: Clinicians agreed that AWVs helped improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities. Tailoring AWV components by MCI/ADRD stage will optimize the visit, maximize health outcomes, and decrease disparities in access to care.

德克萨斯州学术健康科学中心对老年痴呆症患者医疗保险年度健康访视的临床医生视角试点定性研究
背景:对于患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)或阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆(ADRD)的医疗保险受益人的医疗保险年度健康访问(AWVs)的过程和结果,临床医生的观点知之甚少。目的:我们寻求临床医生对awv对MCI/ADRD受益人健康结果和减少差异的影响的意见。设计:医疗保健改进研究所的老年人友好型医疗系统的4Ms框架为本试验定性研究的设计提供了依据。方法:我们采用方便抽样的方法,从德克萨斯州的一个学术卫生科学中心的集水区招募临床医生,他们至少支付1 AWV的费用,通过电话/Zoom进行一次性、一对一、半结构化的访谈。参与者口头同意参与。这项研究符合质量评估项目的联邦规定。结果:我们采访了26名临床医生(17名女性,26名非西班牙裔,12名白人,10名亚洲人,4名黑人,16名家庭医学,5名内科)。大多数同意的awv改善了MCI/ADRD医疗保险受益人的健康结局(n = 23, 88.5%)并减少了健康差异(n = 20, 76.9%)。排名前三位的“什么有效”主题是:(1)非初级保健提供者(如健康护士)通过筛选患者、提供资源/支持以及与初级保健提供者(pcp)分享异常发现来简化AWV的交付;(2) pcp自行制定awv,以与已确定的问题保持一致;(3)分配足够的时间来了解对患者和护理人员最重要的是什么。排在前三位的“什么不起作用”的主题是:(1)临床医生希望有家庭护理人员在场;(2)临床医生需要充分的时间进行深度筛查和整体护理;(3)诊所需要现场社会工作者来解决非医疗问题。结论:临床医生一致认为awv有助于改善健康结果和减少健康差异。根据MCI/ADRD阶段定制AWV组成部分将优化访问,最大化健康结果,并减少获得护理的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书