Eduardo Cimino Cervi, G Allen Burton, Sara M Nedrich, Daniel R Lavoie, Rachel Zajac-Fay, Steven S Brown
{"title":"Distinguishing natural and anthropogenic stressors at a groundwater-surface water interface using a weight-of-evidence framework.","authors":"Eduardo Cimino Cervi, G Allen Burton, Sara M Nedrich, Daniel R Lavoie, Rachel Zajac-Fay, Steven S Brown","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study applied a tiered weight‑of‑evidence (WoE) framework to evaluate whether contaminants of potential concern (COPCs)-chloride, ammonia, total dissolved solids, and elevated pH-transported through groundwater-surface water interactions contribute to benthic impairment at a calcium chloride production site. The assessment focused on five test stations (A to E) near suspected discharge zones and upstream reference sites within a drowned river‑mouth wetland, allowing comparison of exposure and biological responses across a hydrologic gradient. Four lines of evidence (LOEs) were integrated to distinguish natural and anthropogenic stressors influencing benthic macroinvertebrate communities: (1) Physicochemical characterization of COPCs; (2) benthic community assessments using indices of biotic integrity based on the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols and the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, along with reciprocal recolonization studies; (3) in situ toxicity testing; and (4) laboratory microcosm tests simulating contaminant upwelling under reasonable worst-case (RWC) conditions. Surface water pH remained within acceptable limits, whereas chloride and ammonia exceeded the Michigan EGLE regulatory thresholds at stations D and E. Ammonia concentrations exceeded the acute criterion at station E and the chronic criterion at station D. Both stations also experienced nighttime hypoxia (<1 mg L-1 DO). In situ toxicity tests implicated low dissolved oxygen (DO) and elevated ammonia as primary stressors, and microcosm experiments confirmed ammonia-related toxicity under RWC conditions. Benthic bioassessment indices and recolonization studies indicated moderate to severe impairment at stations D and E, while upstream and less-affected stations exhibited communities consistent with reference conditions. A fourth-phase investigation further confirmed DO depletion as a dominant stressor at station E, which showed the highest contaminant levels and the most impaired benthic communities. Overall, these findings highlight the value of a site‑specific WoE framework for distinguishing natural variability from legacy contamination in complex wetland environments and show how iterative refinement improves stressor identification and reduces misinterpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1682-1698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study applied a tiered weight‑of‑evidence (WoE) framework to evaluate whether contaminants of potential concern (COPCs)-chloride, ammonia, total dissolved solids, and elevated pH-transported through groundwater-surface water interactions contribute to benthic impairment at a calcium chloride production site. The assessment focused on five test stations (A to E) near suspected discharge zones and upstream reference sites within a drowned river‑mouth wetland, allowing comparison of exposure and biological responses across a hydrologic gradient. Four lines of evidence (LOEs) were integrated to distinguish natural and anthropogenic stressors influencing benthic macroinvertebrate communities: (1) Physicochemical characterization of COPCs; (2) benthic community assessments using indices of biotic integrity based on the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols and the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, along with reciprocal recolonization studies; (3) in situ toxicity testing; and (4) laboratory microcosm tests simulating contaminant upwelling under reasonable worst-case (RWC) conditions. Surface water pH remained within acceptable limits, whereas chloride and ammonia exceeded the Michigan EGLE regulatory thresholds at stations D and E. Ammonia concentrations exceeded the acute criterion at station E and the chronic criterion at station D. Both stations also experienced nighttime hypoxia (<1 mg L-1 DO). In situ toxicity tests implicated low dissolved oxygen (DO) and elevated ammonia as primary stressors, and microcosm experiments confirmed ammonia-related toxicity under RWC conditions. Benthic bioassessment indices and recolonization studies indicated moderate to severe impairment at stations D and E, while upstream and less-affected stations exhibited communities consistent with reference conditions. A fourth-phase investigation further confirmed DO depletion as a dominant stressor at station E, which showed the highest contaminant levels and the most impaired benthic communities. Overall, these findings highlight the value of a site‑specific WoE framework for distinguishing natural variability from legacy contamination in complex wetland environments and show how iterative refinement improves stressor identification and reduces misinterpretation.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.