Distinguishing natural and anthropogenic stressors at a groundwater-surface water interface using a weight-of-evidence framework.

IF 3.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eduardo Cimino Cervi, G Allen Burton, Sara M Nedrich, Daniel R Lavoie, Rachel Zajac-Fay, Steven S Brown
{"title":"Distinguishing natural and anthropogenic stressors at a groundwater-surface water interface using a weight-of-evidence framework.","authors":"Eduardo Cimino Cervi, G Allen Burton, Sara M Nedrich, Daniel R Lavoie, Rachel Zajac-Fay, Steven S Brown","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study applied a tiered weight‑of‑evidence (WoE) framework to evaluate whether contaminants of potential concern (COPCs)-chloride, ammonia, total dissolved solids, and elevated pH-transported through groundwater-surface water interactions contribute to benthic impairment at a calcium chloride production site. The assessment focused on five test stations (A to E) near suspected discharge zones and upstream reference sites within a drowned river‑mouth wetland, allowing comparison of exposure and biological responses across a hydrologic gradient. Four lines of evidence (LOEs) were integrated to distinguish natural and anthropogenic stressors influencing benthic macroinvertebrate communities: (1) Physicochemical characterization of COPCs; (2) benthic community assessments using indices of biotic integrity based on the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols and the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, along with reciprocal recolonization studies; (3) in situ toxicity testing; and (4) laboratory microcosm tests simulating contaminant upwelling under reasonable worst-case (RWC) conditions. Surface water pH remained within acceptable limits, whereas chloride and ammonia exceeded the Michigan EGLE regulatory thresholds at stations D and E. Ammonia concentrations exceeded the acute criterion at station E and the chronic criterion at station D. Both stations also experienced nighttime hypoxia (<1 mg L-1 DO). In situ toxicity tests implicated low dissolved oxygen (DO) and elevated ammonia as primary stressors, and microcosm experiments confirmed ammonia-related toxicity under RWC conditions. Benthic bioassessment indices and recolonization studies indicated moderate to severe impairment at stations D and E, while upstream and less-affected stations exhibited communities consistent with reference conditions. A fourth-phase investigation further confirmed DO depletion as a dominant stressor at station E, which showed the highest contaminant levels and the most impaired benthic communities. Overall, these findings highlight the value of a site‑specific WoE framework for distinguishing natural variability from legacy contamination in complex wetland environments and show how iterative refinement improves stressor identification and reduces misinterpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1682-1698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applied a tiered weight‑of‑evidence (WoE) framework to evaluate whether contaminants of potential concern (COPCs)-chloride, ammonia, total dissolved solids, and elevated pH-transported through groundwater-surface water interactions contribute to benthic impairment at a calcium chloride production site. The assessment focused on five test stations (A to E) near suspected discharge zones and upstream reference sites within a drowned river‑mouth wetland, allowing comparison of exposure and biological responses across a hydrologic gradient. Four lines of evidence (LOEs) were integrated to distinguish natural and anthropogenic stressors influencing benthic macroinvertebrate communities: (1) Physicochemical characterization of COPCs; (2) benthic community assessments using indices of biotic integrity based on the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols and the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, along with reciprocal recolonization studies; (3) in situ toxicity testing; and (4) laboratory microcosm tests simulating contaminant upwelling under reasonable worst-case (RWC) conditions. Surface water pH remained within acceptable limits, whereas chloride and ammonia exceeded the Michigan EGLE regulatory thresholds at stations D and E. Ammonia concentrations exceeded the acute criterion at station E and the chronic criterion at station D. Both stations also experienced nighttime hypoxia (<1 mg L-1 DO). In situ toxicity tests implicated low dissolved oxygen (DO) and elevated ammonia as primary stressors, and microcosm experiments confirmed ammonia-related toxicity under RWC conditions. Benthic bioassessment indices and recolonization studies indicated moderate to severe impairment at stations D and E, while upstream and less-affected stations exhibited communities consistent with reference conditions. A fourth-phase investigation further confirmed DO depletion as a dominant stressor at station E, which showed the highest contaminant levels and the most impaired benthic communities. Overall, these findings highlight the value of a site‑specific WoE framework for distinguishing natural variability from legacy contamination in complex wetland environments and show how iterative refinement improves stressor identification and reduces misinterpretation.

使用证据权重框架区分地下水-地表水界面的自然和人为压力源。
本研究采用分层证据权重(WoE)框架来评估潜在关注污染物(COPCs)——氯化物、氨、总溶解固体和通过地下水-地表水相互作用运输的ph升高是否会对氯化钙生产现场的底栖生物造成损害。评估的重点是靠近疑似排放区和被淹没的河口湿地上游参考点的5个试验站(A至E),以便在水文梯度上比较暴露和生物反应。综合四种证据线(LOEs)来区分影响底栖大型无脊椎动物群落的自然和人为压力源:(1)COPCs的物理化学特征;(2)基于快速生物评估协议和五大湖滨海湿地监测计划的生物完整性指数的底栖生物群落评估,以及相互再定殖研究;(3)现场毒性试验;(4)模拟合理最坏情况(RWC)条件下污染物上涌的实验室微观试验。地表水pH值保持在可接受范围内,而氯化物和氨在D站和E站超过了密歇根州EGLE调节阈值。氨浓度在E站超过了急性标准,在D站超过了慢性标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书