Evidence-Based Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorders or Misuse Among Older Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2026.2654711
Jeffrey A Morris, Namkee G Choi
{"title":"Evidence-Based Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorders or Misuse Among Older Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jeffrey A Morris, Namkee G Choi","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2026.2654711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Substance use disorders (SUD) are rising among U.S. older adults, yet few studies have synthesized evidence on effective treatments for this population. This scoping review mapped and evaluated U.S.-based empirical literature on evidence-based treatments or evidence-based practices (EBPs) for older adults (age ≥ 60) with SUD. EBPs identified were Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Motivational Interviewing (MI), Medications for SUD, particularly medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, JSTOR, and Google Scholar. Screening and data extraction were performed using Rayyan software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 studies met the inclusion criteria: three for CBT, nine for MI, three for medications for SUD, and three for SBIRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review shows the promise of CBT, MI, MOUD, and SBIRT for older adults with SUD or substance misuse problems, but additional research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Developing specialized, evidence-based interventions remains a critical priority for addressing SUDs among aging populations.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Evidence-informed behavioral interventions (e.g. CBT and MI), pharmacotherapy, and SBIRT may be effective for older adults with SUD; however, more research is needed to establish evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"775-793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2026.2654711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Substance use disorders (SUD) are rising among U.S. older adults, yet few studies have synthesized evidence on effective treatments for this population. This scoping review mapped and evaluated U.S.-based empirical literature on evidence-based treatments or evidence-based practices (EBPs) for older adults (age ≥ 60) with SUD. EBPs identified were Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Motivational Interviewing (MI), Medications for SUD, particularly medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT).

Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, JSTOR, and Google Scholar. Screening and data extraction were performed using Rayyan software.

Results: 18 studies met the inclusion criteria: three for CBT, nine for MI, three for medications for SUD, and three for SBIRT.

Conclusions: Our review shows the promise of CBT, MI, MOUD, and SBIRT for older adults with SUD or substance misuse problems, but additional research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Developing specialized, evidence-based interventions remains a critical priority for addressing SUDs among aging populations.

Clinical implications: Evidence-informed behavioral interventions (e.g. CBT and MI), pharmacotherapy, and SBIRT may be effective for older adults with SUD; however, more research is needed to establish evidence base.

美国老年人物质使用障碍或滥用的循证治疗干预:范围回顾。
目的:物质使用障碍(SUD)在美国老年人中呈上升趋势,但很少有研究对这一人群进行有效治疗的综合证据。本综述绘制并评估了美国关于老年(≥60岁)SUD患者循证治疗或循证实践(ebp)的实证文献。确定的ebp包括认知行为疗法(CBT)、动机性访谈(MI)、SUD药物治疗,特别是阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物治疗,以及筛查、短暂干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT)。方法:按照PRISMA-ScR指南,在PubMed、PsycINFO、JSTOR和谷歌Scholar中进行系统检索。采用Rayyan软件进行筛选和数据提取。结果:18项研究符合纳入标准:3项针对CBT, 9项针对MI, 3项针对SUD药物治疗,3项针对SBIRT。结论:我们的综述显示CBT、MI、mod和SBIRT对患有SUD或药物滥用问题的老年人有希望,但需要进一步的研究来确定其有效性。制定专门的、以证据为基础的干预措施仍然是解决老龄人口中sud问题的关键优先事项。临床意义:循证行为干预(如CBT和MI)、药物治疗和SBIRT可能对老年SUD患者有效;然而,需要更多的研究来建立证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书