Acceptability of and Barriers to Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis: Research Letter.

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20543581251414602
Brigitte H Baragar, Ashley K Seitz, Carmen A Hurd, Clara J Bohm
{"title":"Acceptability of and Barriers to Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis: Research Letter.","authors":"Brigitte H Baragar, Ashley K Seitz, Carmen A Hurd, Clara J Bohm","doi":"10.1177/20543581251414602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals receiving hemodialysis is more accurate than hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and may improve diabetes management in this population, but little is known regarding patient perspectives on CGM technology and its use in clinical outpatient hemodialysis care. We aimed to explore the real-world acceptability of CGM use in nonhospitalized individuals receiving hemodialysis. This pragmatic prospective observational study was nested within a qualitative improvement initiative that embedded an endocrinologist providing care for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c greater than 8% within the hemodialysis unit. As part of this initiative, some people seen by the endocrinologist were prescribed CGMs. These individuals were approached to participate in the study and followed for 2 weeks during CGM wear. Reasons for CGM decline were collected and collated inductively using content analysis. Of 47 consults, only 22 (47%) people were prescribed CGM. Of these, six (27%) declined CGM use and only six (27%) consented to the study, but ultimately only three participants (13.6%) completed the study. Reasons for CGM decline included lack of comfort with technology, cost and poor cellphone, internet and data availability. Our findings suggest that further exploration of barriers to CGM use and solutions to these barriers is required prior to broad use of CGM in real-world outpatient hemodialysis settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"13 ","pages":"20543581251414602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13039640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581251414602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals receiving hemodialysis is more accurate than hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and may improve diabetes management in this population, but little is known regarding patient perspectives on CGM technology and its use in clinical outpatient hemodialysis care. We aimed to explore the real-world acceptability of CGM use in nonhospitalized individuals receiving hemodialysis. This pragmatic prospective observational study was nested within a qualitative improvement initiative that embedded an endocrinologist providing care for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c greater than 8% within the hemodialysis unit. As part of this initiative, some people seen by the endocrinologist were prescribed CGMs. These individuals were approached to participate in the study and followed for 2 weeks during CGM wear. Reasons for CGM decline were collected and collated inductively using content analysis. Of 47 consults, only 22 (47%) people were prescribed CGM. Of these, six (27%) declined CGM use and only six (27%) consented to the study, but ultimately only three participants (13.6%) completed the study. Reasons for CGM decline included lack of comfort with technology, cost and poor cellphone, internet and data availability. Our findings suggest that further exploration of barriers to CGM use and solutions to these barriers is required prior to broad use of CGM in real-world outpatient hemodialysis settings.

接受慢性血液透析的2型糖尿病患者持续血糖监测的可接受性和障碍:研究信函。
在接受血液透析的个体中,连续血糖监测(CGM)比血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)更准确,并可能改善该人群的糖尿病管理,但关于患者对CGM技术及其在临床门诊血液透析护理中的应用的看法知之甚少。我们的目的是探讨现实世界中接受血液透析的非住院个体使用CGM的可接受性。这项实用的前瞻性观察性研究嵌套在一项定性改进计划中,该计划将一名内分泌学家纳入血液透析单元,为2型糖尿病患者和HbA1c大于8%的患者提供护理。作为这项倡议的一部分,内分泌学家给一些人开了cgm。这些人被邀请参加研究,并在CGM佩戴期间随访2周。采用含量分析法对CGM下降的原因进行归纳整理。在47名咨询者中,只有22人(47%)开了CGM处方。其中,6人(27%)拒绝使用CGM,只有6人(27%)同意研究,但最终只有3名参与者(13.6%)完成了研究。CGM下降的原因包括对技术的不满意、成本以及手机、互联网和数据可用性差。我们的研究结果表明,在实际的门诊血液透析环境中广泛使用CGM之前,需要进一步探索CGM使用的障碍和解决这些障碍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, the official journal of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encourages high quality submissions focused on clinical, translational and health services delivery research in the field of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation and organ donation. Our mandate is to promote and advocate for kidney health as it impacts national and international communities. Basic science, translational studies and clinical studies will be peer reviewed and processed by an Editorial Board comprised of geographically diverse Canadian and international nephrologists, internists and allied health professionals; this Editorial Board is mandated to ensure highest quality publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书