The IDO-Isometer: a valuable alternative for measuring the strength of external rotation of the shoulder: a comparative study between two measurement devices.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
J Dufour, D Vandenbosch, A Karelse, L DE Wilde, A VAN Tongel
{"title":"The IDO-Isometer: a valuable alternative for measuring the strength of external rotation of the shoulder: a comparative study between two measurement devices.","authors":"J Dufour, D Vandenbosch, A Karelse, L DE Wilde, A VAN Tongel","doi":"10.52628/91.4.14714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hand-held dynamometer (HHD) is widely used to assess isometric shoulder strength but may present some limitations. The present study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the IDO-Isometer as a potential alternative for measuring isometric external rotation strength of the shoulder at 90° abduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety asymptomatic adult volunteers (45 males, 45 females) underwent strength testing of both shoulders using an HHD and the IDO-Isometer. Measurements were performed in a standardized supine position with the shoulder abducted to 90° and the elbow flexed at 90°. Each device was used three times per shoulder with a 3-minute rest interval between devices. The sequence of testing was randomized. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the IDO-Isometer were evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IDO-Isometer demonstrated excellent agreement with the HHD, with ICC values of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93) for both dominant and non-dominant shoulders. Intra-rater reliability yielded ICCs of 0.95 and 0.92, and inter-rater reliability showed ICCs of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IDO-Isometer demonstrated excellent reliability for measuring isometric external rotation at 90° shoulder abduction. Given its lower cost and ease of use, it may represent a valuable alternative to the HHD in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"91 4","pages":"547-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/91.4.14714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hand-held dynamometer (HHD) is widely used to assess isometric shoulder strength but may present some limitations. The present study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the IDO-Isometer as a potential alternative for measuring isometric external rotation strength of the shoulder at 90° abduction.

Methods: Ninety asymptomatic adult volunteers (45 males, 45 females) underwent strength testing of both shoulders using an HHD and the IDO-Isometer. Measurements were performed in a standardized supine position with the shoulder abducted to 90° and the elbow flexed at 90°. Each device was used three times per shoulder with a 3-minute rest interval between devices. The sequence of testing was randomized. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the IDO-Isometer were evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs).

Results: The IDO-Isometer demonstrated excellent agreement with the HHD, with ICC values of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93) for both dominant and non-dominant shoulders. Intra-rater reliability yielded ICCs of 0.95 and 0.92, and inter-rater reliability showed ICCs of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively.

Conclusion: The IDO-Isometer demonstrated excellent reliability for measuring isometric external rotation at 90° shoulder abduction. Given its lower cost and ease of use, it may represent a valuable alternative to the HHD in both clinical and research settings.

ido等距仪:测量肩关节外旋强度的一种有价值的替代方法:两种测量设备的比较研究。
背景:手持式测力仪(HHD)被广泛用于评估等距肩强度,但可能存在一些局限性。本研究旨在评估ido等距仪作为测量90°外展肩关节等距外旋强度的潜在替代方法的可靠性。方法:90名无症状成年志愿者(45名男性,45名女性)使用HHD和ido等距仪进行了双肩力量测试。测量时采用标准的仰卧位,肩部外展至90°,肘关节屈曲90°。每个设备在每个肩部使用三次,设备之间休息3分钟。试验顺序随机化。使用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估ido等距计的组内和组间可靠性。结果:IDO-Isometer显示与HHD非常吻合,优势肩和非优势肩的ICC值均为0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93)。评级内信度的ICCs分别为0.95和0.92,评级间信度的ICCs分别为0.97和0.96。结论:ido -等距仪在测量90°肩外展的等距外旋时表现出极好的可靠性。鉴于其较低的成本和易于使用,它可能是临床和研究环境中HHD的有价值的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书