{"title":"Speech analysis for differentiating bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder during euthymic states.","authors":"Jhen-Wu Lai, Ya-Han Hu, Ya-Mei Bai, Cheng-Che Shen","doi":"10.1186/s12991-026-00652-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: Differentiating major depressive disorder (MDD) from bipolar disorder (BP) is crucial for early diagnosis and targeted treatment. This study investigates speech, linguistic biomarkers, and machine learning models to differentiate between the MDD and BP patients using speech analysis during symptom-free periods. METHODS: Voice recordings from 191 patients (41 BP, 150 MDD) during euthymic phases were analyzed. Linguistic metrics, sentiment scores, and acoustic features were extracted and compared between the groups. Various machine learning models were employed to classify diagnoses based on these features. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between BP and MDD patients. BP patients exhibited a shorter pause durations per total speaking duration and total word count (0.19 vs. 0.29; p < 0.05, 0.07 vs. 0.12; p < 0.05). MDD patients showed greater variability in speech intensity and peak amplitude during euthymic states. Sentiment analysis revealed no significant differences in broader emotional dimensions. Among the models tested, the Random Forest classifier achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.807), underscoring its effectiveness in differentiating BP from MDD. CONCLUSION: Speech analysis during euthymic periods reveals distinct linguistic and acoustic patterns between MDD and BP patients. These findings highlight the potential of speech features as non-invasive biomarkers for mood disorder classification, offering promising avenues for enhancing clinical decision-making. However, given the sample size, the results are preliminary and warrant replication in larger, independent cohorts. </p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00652-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating major depressive disorder (MDD) from bipolar disorder (BP) is crucial for early diagnosis and targeted treatment. This study investigates speech, linguistic biomarkers, and machine learning models to differentiate between the MDD and BP patients using speech analysis during symptom-free periods. METHODS: Voice recordings from 191 patients (41 BP, 150 MDD) during euthymic phases were analyzed. Linguistic metrics, sentiment scores, and acoustic features were extracted and compared between the groups. Various machine learning models were employed to classify diagnoses based on these features. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between BP and MDD patients. BP patients exhibited a shorter pause durations per total speaking duration and total word count (0.19 vs. 0.29; p < 0.05, 0.07 vs. 0.12; p < 0.05). MDD patients showed greater variability in speech intensity and peak amplitude during euthymic states. Sentiment analysis revealed no significant differences in broader emotional dimensions. Among the models tested, the Random Forest classifier achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.807), underscoring its effectiveness in differentiating BP from MDD. CONCLUSION: Speech analysis during euthymic periods reveals distinct linguistic and acoustic patterns between MDD and BP patients. These findings highlight the potential of speech features as non-invasive biomarkers for mood disorder classification, offering promising avenues for enhancing clinical decision-making. However, given the sample size, the results are preliminary and warrant replication in larger, independent cohorts.
目的:区分重度抑郁障碍(MDD)与双相情感障碍(BP)对早期诊断和靶向治疗至关重要。本研究利用无症状期的语音分析,研究言语、语言生物标志物和机器学习模型来区分重度抑郁症和BP患者。方法:对191例患者(41 BP, 150 MDD)的健郁期录音进行分析。语言指标、情感得分和声学特征被提取出来,并在两组之间进行比较。使用各种机器学习模型根据这些特征对诊断进行分类。结果:BP患者与MDD患者之间存在显著差异。BP患者每总说话时间和总字数停顿时间较短(0.19 vs. 0.29; p
期刊介绍:
Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged.
Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.