Speech analysis for differentiating bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder during euthymic states.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jhen-Wu Lai, Ya-Han Hu, Ya-Mei Bai, Cheng-Che Shen
{"title":"Speech analysis for differentiating bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder during euthymic states.","authors":"Jhen-Wu Lai, Ya-Han Hu, Ya-Mei Bai, Cheng-Che Shen","doi":"10.1186/s12991-026-00652-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: Differentiating major depressive disorder (MDD) from bipolar disorder (BP) is crucial for early diagnosis and targeted treatment. This study investigates speech, linguistic biomarkers, and machine learning models to differentiate between the MDD and BP patients using speech analysis during symptom-free periods. METHODS: Voice recordings from 191 patients (41 BP, 150 MDD) during euthymic phases were analyzed. Linguistic metrics, sentiment scores, and acoustic features were extracted and compared between the groups. Various machine learning models were employed to classify diagnoses based on these features. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between BP and MDD patients. BP patients exhibited a shorter pause durations per total speaking duration and total word count (0.19 vs. 0.29; p < 0.05, 0.07 vs. 0.12; p < 0.05). MDD patients showed greater variability in speech intensity and peak amplitude during euthymic states. Sentiment analysis revealed no significant differences in broader emotional dimensions. Among the models tested, the Random Forest classifier achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.807), underscoring its effectiveness in differentiating BP from MDD. CONCLUSION: Speech analysis during euthymic periods reveals distinct linguistic and acoustic patterns between MDD and BP patients. These findings highlight the potential of speech features as non-invasive biomarkers for mood disorder classification, offering promising avenues for enhancing clinical decision-making. However, given the sample size, the results are preliminary and warrant replication in larger, independent cohorts. </p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00652-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Differentiating major depressive disorder (MDD) from bipolar disorder (BP) is crucial for early diagnosis and targeted treatment. This study investigates speech, linguistic biomarkers, and machine learning models to differentiate between the MDD and BP patients using speech analysis during symptom-free periods. METHODS: Voice recordings from 191 patients (41 BP, 150 MDD) during euthymic phases were analyzed. Linguistic metrics, sentiment scores, and acoustic features were extracted and compared between the groups. Various machine learning models were employed to classify diagnoses based on these features. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between BP and MDD patients. BP patients exhibited a shorter pause durations per total speaking duration and total word count (0.19 vs. 0.29; p < 0.05, 0.07 vs. 0.12; p < 0.05). MDD patients showed greater variability in speech intensity and peak amplitude during euthymic states. Sentiment analysis revealed no significant differences in broader emotional dimensions. Among the models tested, the Random Forest classifier achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.807), underscoring its effectiveness in differentiating BP from MDD. CONCLUSION: Speech analysis during euthymic periods reveals distinct linguistic and acoustic patterns between MDD and BP patients. These findings highlight the potential of speech features as non-invasive biomarkers for mood disorder classification, offering promising avenues for enhancing clinical decision-making. However, given the sample size, the results are preliminary and warrant replication in larger, independent cohorts.

言语分析鉴别双相情感障碍和重性抑郁障碍。
目的:区分重度抑郁障碍(MDD)与双相情感障碍(BP)对早期诊断和靶向治疗至关重要。本研究利用无症状期的语音分析,研究言语、语言生物标志物和机器学习模型来区分重度抑郁症和BP患者。方法:对191例患者(41 BP, 150 MDD)的健郁期录音进行分析。语言指标、情感得分和声学特征被提取出来,并在两组之间进行比较。使用各种机器学习模型根据这些特征对诊断进行分类。结果:BP患者与MDD患者之间存在显著差异。BP患者每总说话时间和总字数停顿时间较短(0.19 vs. 0.29; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged. Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书