Surgical treatment for medial epicondyle tendinopathy: a systematic literature review.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
J T Poolton, J Minett, A Kazmi
{"title":"Surgical treatment for medial epicondyle tendinopathy: a systematic literature review.","authors":"J T Poolton, J Minett, A Kazmi","doi":"10.52628/91.4.14595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medial epicondyle tendinopathy is a pathology of the common flexor-pronator elbow tendon. Surgical intervention is indicated if conservative management modalities fail. This review aimed to determine if surgical intervention is an effective treatment for medial epicondyle tendinopathy in general population adults. Studies measuring pain, using the Visual Analogue Scale; grip strength, using a hand-held dynamometer; and/or function, using a validated quantitative tool, following surgical management of medial epicondyle tendinopathy in patients aged ≥18 years were searched for. Databases searched included Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OpenGrey and PubMed. Study quality was assessed using the NICE quality appraisal checklist for quantitative studies reporting correlations and associations, and findings were presented in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Four case series including a total of 105 (11 treated arthroscopically, 34 percutaneous and 60 open) patients with mean ages of 45-52.5 years met the inclusion criteria. All 4 studies measured validated quantitative outcomes, including MEPI (n=2), DASH (n=2) and VAS (n=2). One study observed significant improvements in VAS (P=0.006) and DASH (P=0.04), while another observed a significant improvement in MEPI (P<.0001). Post-operative complication rates for each approach were 18.18% (2/11) for arthroscopic, 0% (0/60) for open and 0% (0/34) for percutaneous. Study quality ranged from low (n=1) to medium (n=3) for internal validity, and medium (n=1) to high (n=3) for external validity. In conclusion, there is a small-sized (n=4) and weak recommendation for using surgical management of medial epicondyle tendinopathy in general population adults, owning to the limited and generally low-quality of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"91 4","pages":"429-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/91.4.14595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medial epicondyle tendinopathy is a pathology of the common flexor-pronator elbow tendon. Surgical intervention is indicated if conservative management modalities fail. This review aimed to determine if surgical intervention is an effective treatment for medial epicondyle tendinopathy in general population adults. Studies measuring pain, using the Visual Analogue Scale; grip strength, using a hand-held dynamometer; and/or function, using a validated quantitative tool, following surgical management of medial epicondyle tendinopathy in patients aged ≥18 years were searched for. Databases searched included Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OpenGrey and PubMed. Study quality was assessed using the NICE quality appraisal checklist for quantitative studies reporting correlations and associations, and findings were presented in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Four case series including a total of 105 (11 treated arthroscopically, 34 percutaneous and 60 open) patients with mean ages of 45-52.5 years met the inclusion criteria. All 4 studies measured validated quantitative outcomes, including MEPI (n=2), DASH (n=2) and VAS (n=2). One study observed significant improvements in VAS (P=0.006) and DASH (P=0.04), while another observed a significant improvement in MEPI (P<.0001). Post-operative complication rates for each approach were 18.18% (2/11) for arthroscopic, 0% (0/60) for open and 0% (0/34) for percutaneous. Study quality ranged from low (n=1) to medium (n=3) for internal validity, and medium (n=1) to high (n=3) for external validity. In conclusion, there is a small-sized (n=4) and weak recommendation for using surgical management of medial epicondyle tendinopathy in general population adults, owning to the limited and generally low-quality of evidence.

内上髁肌腱病变的手术治疗:系统的文献回顾。
内侧上髁肌腱病是肘关节屈旋肌腱的一种病变。如果保守管理方式失败,则需要手术干预。本综述旨在确定手术干预是否对普通成年人的内上髁肌腱病变有效。使用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛的研究;握力,采用手持式测功机;使用经过验证的定量工具,对年龄≥18岁的患者内侧上髁肌腱病变手术后的功能和/或功能进行了搜索。检索的数据库包括Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、OpenGrey和PubMed。研究质量采用NICE质量评价清单进行评估,该清单用于定量研究报告相关性和相关性,并根据PRISMA指南提出研究结果。4个病例系列共105例(11例经关节镜治疗,34例经皮治疗,60例切开治疗),平均年龄45-52.5岁,符合纳入标准。所有4项研究均测量了有效的定量结果,包括MEPI (n=2)、DASH (n=2)和VAS (n=2)。一项研究观察到VAS (P=0.006)和DASH (P=0.04)的显著改善,而另一项研究观察到MEPI (P=0.006)的显著改善
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书