{"title":"<i>Commentary Note:</i> Do We still Need Liquid Chromatography Combined with Mass Spectrometry for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus?","authors":"Tracy Kisler, Melody Nelson, Amitava Dasgupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In our laboratory, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) of tacrolimus on the Alinity i was implemented in February 2023 with an option for physicians to request liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis to confirm the level of the immunoassay result.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CMIA tacrolimus was performed on the Alinity i analyzer and the result was reported within 4h. However, if a physician requested LC-MS/MS analysis, the same whole blood specimen was sent to the reference laboratory, where the result was available within 24h. We then compared the LC-MS/MS value with the initial immunoassay result, which was performed in the same specimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2, 2023, till November 18<sup>th</sup>, 2025, 51,833 tacrolimus tests were ordered in our laboratory. Out of all these specimens only 795 specimens (1.53%) were sent to the reference laboratory for further analysis by LC-MS/MS as requested by ordering physicians. In the majority of specimens (634 out of 795, 79.7%) difference between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS was less than 20%. However, 27 specimens (3.4%) showed positive bias over 30% with a highest bias of 76.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC-MS/MS is still needed for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus.</p>","PeriodicalId":8228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","volume":"56 1","pages":"130-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In our laboratory, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) of tacrolimus on the Alinity i was implemented in February 2023 with an option for physicians to request liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis to confirm the level of the immunoassay result.
Methods: CMIA tacrolimus was performed on the Alinity i analyzer and the result was reported within 4h. However, if a physician requested LC-MS/MS analysis, the same whole blood specimen was sent to the reference laboratory, where the result was available within 24h. We then compared the LC-MS/MS value with the initial immunoassay result, which was performed in the same specimen.
Results: From February 2, 2023, till November 18th, 2025, 51,833 tacrolimus tests were ordered in our laboratory. Out of all these specimens only 795 specimens (1.53%) were sent to the reference laboratory for further analysis by LC-MS/MS as requested by ordering physicians. In the majority of specimens (634 out of 795, 79.7%) difference between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS was less than 20%. However, 27 specimens (3.4%) showed positive bias over 30% with a highest bias of 76.7%.
Conclusion: LC-MS/MS is still needed for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science
welcomes manuscripts that report research in clinical
science, including pathology, clinical chemistry,
biotechnology, molecular biology, cytogenetics,
microbiology, immunology, hematology, transfusion
medicine, organ and tissue transplantation, therapeutics, toxicology, and clinical informatics.