A Pipeline Defect Size Prediction Method Integrating Simulation-Driven, Data Augmentation, and Physics-Guided Approaches

IF 3 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Xulai Zhu, Yuxiang Zhang, Qiansheng Fang, Jin Jiang, Gongquan Zhang
{"title":"A Pipeline Defect Size Prediction Method Integrating Simulation-Driven, Data Augmentation, and Physics-Guided Approaches","authors":"Xulai Zhu,&nbsp;Yuxiang Zhang,&nbsp;Qiansheng Fang,&nbsp;Jin Jiang,&nbsp;Gongquan Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10921-026-01355-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) testing is a vital technique for the quantitative assessment of internal defect dimensions in oil and gas pipelines. However, existing inversion methods face dual challenges: traditional physical forward computational models are excessively time-consuming, while purely data-driven deep learning models (i.e., “black-box” models) typically lack physical interpretability and generalization capability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel pipeline defect size prediction framework that integrates simulation-driven modeling, data augmentation, and physics-guided mechanisms. First, a defect dataset containing dual-channel MFL signals (axial and radial components) is constructed via finite element simulation. Subsequently, a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) is employed to augment the dataset, thereby overcoming the bottleneck of scarce high-fidelity defect samples. Finally, a dual-channel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is constructed, into which a Physical Proxy Model (PPM) is introduced. The PPM embeds the “dimension-signal” physical mapping mechanism into the network as a loss constraint, enforcing the model to strictly adhere to underlying physical laws during prediction. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance in predicting defect length, width, and depth, yielding an overall Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.7525 mm and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.2128 mm. Compared to the benchmark LSTM model, the MAE is significantly reduced by 14.15%. The proposed framework realizes an effective fusion of data-driven and physics-driven mechanisms, offering a novel paradigm for defect prediction in complex scenarios where complete physical equations are unavailable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-026-01355-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) testing is a vital technique for the quantitative assessment of internal defect dimensions in oil and gas pipelines. However, existing inversion methods face dual challenges: traditional physical forward computational models are excessively time-consuming, while purely data-driven deep learning models (i.e., “black-box” models) typically lack physical interpretability and generalization capability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel pipeline defect size prediction framework that integrates simulation-driven modeling, data augmentation, and physics-guided mechanisms. First, a defect dataset containing dual-channel MFL signals (axial and radial components) is constructed via finite element simulation. Subsequently, a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) is employed to augment the dataset, thereby overcoming the bottleneck of scarce high-fidelity defect samples. Finally, a dual-channel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is constructed, into which a Physical Proxy Model (PPM) is introduced. The PPM embeds the “dimension-signal” physical mapping mechanism into the network as a loss constraint, enforcing the model to strictly adhere to underlying physical laws during prediction. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance in predicting defect length, width, and depth, yielding an overall Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.7525 mm and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.2128 mm. Compared to the benchmark LSTM model, the MAE is significantly reduced by 14.15%. The proposed framework realizes an effective fusion of data-driven and physics-driven mechanisms, offering a novel paradigm for defect prediction in complex scenarios where complete physical equations are unavailable.

集成仿真驱动、数据增强和物理指导方法的管道缺陷尺寸预测方法
漏磁检测是油气管道内部缺陷尺寸定量评估的一项重要技术。然而,现有的反演方法面临双重挑战:传统的物理正演计算模型过于耗时,而纯数据驱动的深度学习模型(即“黑箱”模型)通常缺乏物理可解释性和泛化能力。为了解决这些问题,本文提出了一种新的管道缺陷尺寸预测框架,该框架集成了仿真驱动建模、数据增强和物理指导机制。首先,通过有限元仿真构建了包含双通道MFL信号(轴向和径向分量)的缺陷数据集;随后,采用条件变分自编码器(CVAE)对数据集进行扩充,克服了高保真缺陷样本稀缺的瓶颈。最后,构造了一个双通道卷积神经网络(CNN),并在CNN中引入了物理代理模型(PPM)。PPM将“维度信号”物理映射机制作为损失约束嵌入到网络中,强制模型在预测期间严格遵守底层物理定律。实验结果表明,该方法在预测缺陷长度、宽度和深度方面具有较好的性能,总体平均绝对误差(MAE)为0.7525 mm,均方根误差(RMSE)为1.2128 mm。与基准LSTM模型相比,MAE显著降低了14.15%。提出的框架实现了数据驱动和物理驱动机制的有效融合,为无法获得完整物理方程的复杂场景中的缺陷预测提供了一种新的范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation provides a forum for the broad range of scientific and engineering activities involved in developing a quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) capability. This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers on the development of new equipment, analyses, and approaches to nondestructive measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书