An Analysis of the Results of Studying the Separation of Particles in the Upper Part of CFB Apparatuses

IF 1.3 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
G. A. Ryabov, O. M. Folomeev
{"title":"An Analysis of the Results of Studying the Separation of Particles in the Upper Part of CFB Apparatuses","authors":"G. A. Ryabov,&nbsp;O. M. Folomeev","doi":"10.1134/S0040601525700776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Matters concerned with the motion of solid particles in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) apparatuses are considered. It is shown that a significant portion of particles does not enter the cyclones and returns into the furnace, thereby producing an internal circulation loop. The particle capturing efficiency, i.e., the downward to the upward flow rate ratio, depends on the geometrical parameters at the furnace outlet to the cyclone and on the physical characteristics that can be expressed in terms of the Stokes number. The ratio of the outlet port area to the furnace or CFB reactor area is the most important parameter. It has been shown that in analyzing and comparing data, it is also necessary to take into account other geometrical indicators, such as possible influence of density and mass flows, as well as methods for determining them. Measured upward flow rate values, as for example those obtained in the authors’ own experiments, can be the most representative ones. The experimental data obtained at the All-Russian Thermal Engineering Institute (VTI) under different flow outlet conditions from furnace models were analyzed. The upward and downward mass flow rates near the outlet port and the flowrate of circulating material captured in the separator are compared. The authors’ own studies have shown that the average size of sand particles increases to some degree with increasing the air velocity. Therefore, all previously obtained results were recalculated in this study with taking into account the updated upward flow rate and decrease in the particle sizes at low gas velocities, and compared with the experimental and calculated data reported in the literature sources. The values the authors obtained on the test bench facility with a cross section of 0.4 × 0.4 m lie by approximately 20–30% below the calculated values. The same also relates to other conditions of flow outlet from the furnace, except for the data on the boiler and data at which the calculated values are very close to the experimental ones. A correction of the calculation relationship is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"73 2","pages":"81 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601525700776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Matters concerned with the motion of solid particles in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) apparatuses are considered. It is shown that a significant portion of particles does not enter the cyclones and returns into the furnace, thereby producing an internal circulation loop. The particle capturing efficiency, i.e., the downward to the upward flow rate ratio, depends on the geometrical parameters at the furnace outlet to the cyclone and on the physical characteristics that can be expressed in terms of the Stokes number. The ratio of the outlet port area to the furnace or CFB reactor area is the most important parameter. It has been shown that in analyzing and comparing data, it is also necessary to take into account other geometrical indicators, such as possible influence of density and mass flows, as well as methods for determining them. Measured upward flow rate values, as for example those obtained in the authors’ own experiments, can be the most representative ones. The experimental data obtained at the All-Russian Thermal Engineering Institute (VTI) under different flow outlet conditions from furnace models were analyzed. The upward and downward mass flow rates near the outlet port and the flowrate of circulating material captured in the separator are compared. The authors’ own studies have shown that the average size of sand particles increases to some degree with increasing the air velocity. Therefore, all previously obtained results were recalculated in this study with taking into account the updated upward flow rate and decrease in the particle sizes at low gas velocities, and compared with the experimental and calculated data reported in the literature sources. The values the authors obtained on the test bench facility with a cross section of 0.4 × 0.4 m lie by approximately 20–30% below the calculated values. The same also relates to other conditions of flow outlet from the furnace, except for the data on the boiler and data at which the calculated values are very close to the experimental ones. A correction of the calculation relationship is proposed.

Abstract Image

循环流化床装置上部颗粒分离研究结果分析
考虑了循环流化床(CFB)装置中固体颗粒的运动问题。结果表明,相当一部分颗粒没有进入旋风,而是返回到炉内,从而产生了一个内循环回路。颗粒捕获效率,即向下和向上的流量比,取决于炉膛出口到旋风分离器的几何参数和可以用斯托克斯数表示的物理特性。出口面积与炉膛或循环流化床反应器面积的比值是最重要的参数。研究表明,在分析和比较数据时,还需要考虑其他几何指标,如密度和质量流的可能影响,以及确定它们的方法。测量的向上流速值,例如作者自己的实验中得到的值,可以是最具代表性的。分析了全俄热工研究所(VTI)在不同出口流量条件下的炉模型实验数据。比较了出口附近的向上和向下的质量流量以及分离器中捕获的循环物料的流量。作者自己的研究表明,随着空气流速的增加,沙粒的平均尺寸在一定程度上增加。因此,在本研究中,考虑到更新后的向上流速和低气速下颗粒尺寸的减小,对之前得到的所有结果进行了重新计算,并与文献中报道的实验和计算数据进行了比较。在截面为0.4 × 0.4 m的试验台装置上得到的数值比计算值低约20-30%。除锅炉上的数据和计算值与实验值非常接近外,炉膛出口的其他条件也是如此。对计算关系进行了修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书