The Influence of Production Technology and Subsequent Deformation Treatment on the Microstructure and Properties of the Al–0.5Fe Alloy

IF 0.9 4区 材料科学 Q4 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
A. E. Medvedev, A. F. Shaikhulova, O. O. Zhukova, N. A. Enikeev, M. M. Motkov, M. Yu. Murashkin
{"title":"The Influence of Production Technology and Subsequent Deformation Treatment on the Microstructure and Properties of the Al–0.5Fe Alloy","authors":"A. E. Medvedev,&nbsp;A. F. Shaikhulova,&nbsp;O. O. Zhukova,&nbsp;N. A. Enikeev,&nbsp;M. M. Motkov,&nbsp;M. Yu. Murashkin","doi":"10.1134/S1067821225601297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two alloys with similar chemical composition—Al–0.5 wt % Fe were produced via two different production technology being casting into electromagnetic mold (EMC) and continuous casting and rolling (CCR), respectively. Production methods provided different cooling rates resulting in different structure formation and sets of properties, such as mechanical strength, elongation to failure and electrical conductivity. Samples of the alloys were subjected to the combination of the equal-channel angular pressing by the “Conform” scheme and cold drawing (ECAP-С + CD), as well as cold drawing (CD) only. It was demonstrated that the difference in production process provided distinct structural states, mainly different in size and distribution of the intermetallic particles. Differences in the morphology of the intermetallic particles notably affected the physical and mechanical properties of the alloys, mainly electrical conductivity. Thermal stability of the alloys, measured according to the international standard for thermal-resistant aluminium alloy wire for overhead line conductor, differs as well, depending on the particle morphology—EMC alloy retains 94–98% of its ultimate tensile strength after annealing, while CCR alloy only 60–83%.</p>","PeriodicalId":765,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals","volume":"67 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1067821225601297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two alloys with similar chemical composition—Al–0.5 wt % Fe were produced via two different production technology being casting into electromagnetic mold (EMC) and continuous casting and rolling (CCR), respectively. Production methods provided different cooling rates resulting in different structure formation and sets of properties, such as mechanical strength, elongation to failure and electrical conductivity. Samples of the alloys were subjected to the combination of the equal-channel angular pressing by the “Conform” scheme and cold drawing (ECAP-С + CD), as well as cold drawing (CD) only. It was demonstrated that the difference in production process provided distinct structural states, mainly different in size and distribution of the intermetallic particles. Differences in the morphology of the intermetallic particles notably affected the physical and mechanical properties of the alloys, mainly electrical conductivity. Thermal stability of the alloys, measured according to the international standard for thermal-resistant aluminium alloy wire for overhead line conductor, differs as well, depending on the particle morphology—EMC alloy retains 94–98% of its ultimate tensile strength after annealing, while CCR alloy only 60–83%.

Abstract Image

生产工艺及后续变形处理对Al-0.5Fe合金组织和性能的影响
采用电磁结晶器(EMC)和连铸连轧(CCR)两种不同的工艺制备了化学成分相近的两种合金al - 0.5 wt % Fe。生产方法提供不同的冷却速度,导致不同的组织形成和一系列性能,如机械强度、断裂伸长率和导电性。合金样品进行了“符合”方案的等通道角挤压和冷拔(ECAP-С + CD)以及仅冷拔(CD)的组合。结果表明,不同的生产工艺导致了不同的结构状态,主要表现在金属间颗粒的大小和分布上。金属间颗粒形貌的差异显著影响合金的物理力学性能,主要是电导率。根据《架空线路导体用耐热铝合金线》国际标准,合金的热稳定性也因颗粒形态的不同而不同——emc合金在退火后仍能保持94-98%的极限抗拉强度,而CCR合金仅能保持60-83%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals is a journal the main goal of which is to achieve new knowledge in the following topics: extraction metallurgy, hydro- and pirometallurgy, casting, plastic deformation, metallography and heat treatment, powder metallurgy and composites, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis, surface engineering and advanced protected coatings, environments, and energy capacity in non-ferrous metallurgy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书