Modification of microalgae-based toxicity assessment by continuously updating the tested solution: taking sulfonamide toxicity as an example

IF 7.9 Q1 Environmental Science
Water Cycle Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.watcyc.2026.02.005
Meizi Yang , Kehan Zhou , Xinmei Jia , Ziyi Lou , Lin-Lan Zhuang , Jian Zhang
{"title":"Modification of microalgae-based toxicity assessment by continuously updating the tested solution: taking sulfonamide toxicity as an example","authors":"Meizi Yang ,&nbsp;Kehan Zhou ,&nbsp;Xinmei Jia ,&nbsp;Ziyi Lou ,&nbsp;Lin-Lan Zhuang ,&nbsp;Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.watcyc.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Toxicity assessments using microalgae are commonly conducted to reflect the ecological risks posed by exogenous pollutants. In natural water, pollutant concentrations often remain constant due to continuous import from point or non-point sources. However, in the laboratory, pollutants are mixed with test organisms at the beginning of the toxicity assessment and are gradually biodegraded, which may not accurately reflect the continuous pollution present in natural conditions. Therefore, this study proposed a new method that fresh pollutants (three typical sulfonamides, SAs) were continuously provided to the testing organism (microalgae, <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em>) in the detection system. The difference in algal growth ratio between test group and control group (named Δr) was applied to reflect the toxicity of antibiotics. It was revealed that the three SAs caused greater inhibition or less promotion effect on 5–7 days' microalgae growth when using the proposed method, compared to the traditional method. This result demonstrated that the traditional test could under-estimate the antibiotic toxicity. Furthermore, a blueprint of the extended method and its corresponding device were proposed based on the idea of plug flow to determine the toxicity of antibiotics and their intermediate products generated during various treatment processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34143,"journal":{"name":"Water Cycle","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 417-421"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Cycle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666445326000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxicity assessments using microalgae are commonly conducted to reflect the ecological risks posed by exogenous pollutants. In natural water, pollutant concentrations often remain constant due to continuous import from point or non-point sources. However, in the laboratory, pollutants are mixed with test organisms at the beginning of the toxicity assessment and are gradually biodegraded, which may not accurately reflect the continuous pollution present in natural conditions. Therefore, this study proposed a new method that fresh pollutants (three typical sulfonamides, SAs) were continuously provided to the testing organism (microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris) in the detection system. The difference in algal growth ratio between test group and control group (named Δr) was applied to reflect the toxicity of antibiotics. It was revealed that the three SAs caused greater inhibition or less promotion effect on 5–7 days' microalgae growth when using the proposed method, compared to the traditional method. This result demonstrated that the traditional test could under-estimate the antibiotic toxicity. Furthermore, a blueprint of the extended method and its corresponding device were proposed based on the idea of plug flow to determine the toxicity of antibiotics and their intermediate products generated during various treatment processes.

Abstract Image

不断更新被试溶液对微藻毒性评价的修改——以磺胺毒性评价为例
利用微藻进行毒性评估通常是为了反映外源污染物带来的生态风险。在天然水中,由于从点源或非点源不断输入,污染物浓度往往保持不变。然而,在实验室中,污染物在毒性评估开始时与试验生物混合,并逐渐被生物降解,这可能不能准确反映自然条件下存在的持续污染。因此,本研究提出了一种新的方法,即在检测系统中连续向检测生物(微藻、小球藻)提供新鲜污染物(三种典型磺胺类,SAs)。用试验组与对照组藻类生长比的差异(Δr)来反映抗生素的毒性。结果表明,与传统方法相比,采用该方法对5-7天微藻生长的抑制作用更大,促进作用更小。结果表明,传统的检测方法可能会低估抗生素的毒性。在此基础上,提出了一种基于塞流思想的扩展方法及其相应的装置,以确定抗生素及其中间产物在不同处理过程中产生的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Cycle
Water Cycle Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
45 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书