Influence of Vertical Facial Patterns on Dental Arch Parameters in Class III Malocclusions: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gamze Yıldırım, Elif Aybüke Öztürk, Yasemin Bahar Acar
{"title":"Influence of Vertical Facial Patterns on Dental Arch Parameters in Class III Malocclusions: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Gamze Yıldırım, Elif Aybüke Öztürk, Yasemin Bahar Acar","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2026.2025.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how vertical-patterns influence dental arch dimensions in class I (CI) and class III (CIII) malocclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pretreatment patient files, lateral cephalometric parameters, and initial intraoral digital models of adult patients were retrieved from the archive in an academic setting. Skeletal and dental CI and CIII individuals were divided into three subgroups (n=20 for each group) according to frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) values (angle between Frankfurt horizontal and mandibular planes): FMA <22° for low-angle (L), FMA=22-28° for normal-angle (N), and FMA >28° for high-angle (H) vertical patterns. Dental arch parameters were measured on digital models using 3D Slicer software (version 5.6.1; www.slicer.org). One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed. The significance level was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference in maxillary intermolar width was found between CI-H and CIII-L groups (p=0.004). A significant difference in the maxillary intermolar angle was found between the CIII-N and CI-N groups and between the CIII-N and CI-L groups (p=0.003). A significant difference in intermolar mandibular width was observed between the CI-H and CI-L groups (p=0.002). Occlusal angle differed significantly between the CI-N and CIII-H groups and between the CI-N and CIII-L groups (p=0.002). No differences were observed in intercanine width, arch length, or arch depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CIII-L group has a significantly greater intermolar width for both maxillary and mandibular arches. The clinical implications of this result can be particularly important when selecting prefabricated archwires. Therefore, it is recommended that this difference be taken into consideration in diagnosis and treatment planning to achieve effective and stable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"39 1","pages":"26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13041078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2026.2025.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how vertical-patterns influence dental arch dimensions in class I (CI) and class III (CIII) malocclusions.

Methods: Pretreatment patient files, lateral cephalometric parameters, and initial intraoral digital models of adult patients were retrieved from the archive in an academic setting. Skeletal and dental CI and CIII individuals were divided into three subgroups (n=20 for each group) according to frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) values (angle between Frankfurt horizontal and mandibular planes): FMA <22° for low-angle (L), FMA=22-28° for normal-angle (N), and FMA >28° for high-angle (H) vertical patterns. Dental arch parameters were measured on digital models using 3D Slicer software (version 5.6.1; www.slicer.org). One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed. The significance level was set at p<0.05.

Results: A significant difference in maxillary intermolar width was found between CI-H and CIII-L groups (p=0.004). A significant difference in the maxillary intermolar angle was found between the CIII-N and CI-N groups and between the CIII-N and CI-L groups (p=0.003). A significant difference in intermolar mandibular width was observed between the CI-H and CI-L groups (p=0.002). Occlusal angle differed significantly between the CI-N and CIII-H groups and between the CI-N and CIII-L groups (p=0.002). No differences were observed in intercanine width, arch length, or arch depth.

Conclusion: CIII-L group has a significantly greater intermolar width for both maxillary and mandibular arches. The clinical implications of this result can be particularly important when selecting prefabricated archwires. Therefore, it is recommended that this difference be taken into consideration in diagnosis and treatment planning to achieve effective and stable outcomes.

垂直面部模式对III类错颌牙弓参数影响的横断面研究。
目的:探讨垂直形态对ⅰ类(CI)和ⅲ类(CIII)错颌牙弓尺寸的影响。方法:从学术档案中检索预处理患者档案、侧位头测量参数和成人患者的初始口内数字模型。根据法兰克福-下颌平面角(FMA)值(法兰克福水平平面与下颌平面之间的角度)将骨骼和牙齿CI和CIII个体分为三个亚组(每组n=20): FMA为28°为高角度(H)垂直模式。使用3D Slicer软件(版本5.6.1;www.slicer.org)在数字模型上测量牙弓参数。采用单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Spearman相关分析。结果:CI-H组与CIII-L组上颌磨牙间宽度差异有统计学意义(p=0.004)。CIII-N组与CI-N组、CIII-N组与CI-L组上颌磨牙间角差异有统计学意义(p=0.003)。CI-H组与CI-L组的下颌磨牙间宽度差异有统计学意义(p=0.002)。CI-N组与CIII-H组、CI-N组与CIII-L组的咬合角差异有统计学意义(p=0.002)。在犬齿间宽度、弓长或弓深方面没有观察到差异。结论:CIII-L组上颌和下颌弓的磨牙间宽度均明显增大。该结果的临床意义在选择预制弓丝时尤为重要。因此,建议在诊断和治疗计划中考虑到这种差异,以获得有效和稳定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书