Prognostic significance of quantitative EBV biomarkers in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis of EBV DNA load and EBER-positive cell proportion.
Xue Song Wang, Di Liu, Xia Zhu, Nan Shi, Wei Xia, Anzhou Tang
{"title":"Prognostic significance of quantitative EBV biomarkers in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis of EBV DNA load and EBER-positive cell proportion.","authors":"Xue Song Wang, Di Liu, Xia Zhu, Nan Shi, Wei Xia, Anzhou Tang","doi":"10.1186/s13027-026-00752-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVES: Pre-treatment peripheral blood EBV DNA and tumor EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) are recognized prognostic factors in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma (ENKTL). However, their quantitative values and optimal positive thresholds remain inconsistent, hindering clinical application. This meta-analysis systematically assesses their prognostic value in ENKTL. METHODS: Relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until 24 December, 2025. Eligible studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) based on Pre-treatment EBV DNA levels or tumor EBER positivity. Subsequently, Pooled HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via random-effects models. Next, Subgroup analyses examined different blood compartments, EBV DNA cut-offs, and study design. Additionally, Heterogeneity (I²) and publication bias (Egger’s test) were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 17 studies from 15 articles were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 15 on EBV DNA and 2 on EBER. These studies demonstrated that elevated pre-treatment EBV DNA level (HR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.97–4.69; P < 0.001, I2 = 38%) and high tumor EBER positivity thresholds of ≥ 75% (HR = 5.53, 95%CI2.21-14.38; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) independently predicted reduced survival. Moreover, Stratification by EBV DNA cut-off (500 copies/ML) showed significantly higher mortality risk in the ≥ 500 group (HR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.84–4.31; P < 0.001) compared to the < 500 group (HR = 2.66, 95% CI 0.56–12.72; P = 0.22). Furthermore, Egger’s test suggested no publication bias(P = 0.111). Finally, Sensitivity analyses suggested the robustness and credibility of our results. CONCLUSIONS: High pre-treatment EBV DNA load (cut-off of ≥ 500 copies/mL) and high EBER-Positive Cell Proportion (≥ 75%) predict poor survival in ENKTL. Those quantitative EBV Biomarkers may serve as practical biomarkers for risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions in this patient population. </p>","PeriodicalId":13568,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Agents and Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Agents and Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-026-00752-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pre-treatment peripheral blood EBV DNA and tumor EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) are recognized prognostic factors in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma (ENKTL). However, their quantitative values and optimal positive thresholds remain inconsistent, hindering clinical application. This meta-analysis systematically assesses their prognostic value in ENKTL. METHODS: Relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until 24 December, 2025. Eligible studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) based on Pre-treatment EBV DNA levels or tumor EBER positivity. Subsequently, Pooled HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via random-effects models. Next, Subgroup analyses examined different blood compartments, EBV DNA cut-offs, and study design. Additionally, Heterogeneity (I²) and publication bias (Egger’s test) were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 17 studies from 15 articles were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 15 on EBV DNA and 2 on EBER. These studies demonstrated that elevated pre-treatment EBV DNA level (HR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.97–4.69; P < 0.001, I2 = 38%) and high tumor EBER positivity thresholds of ≥ 75% (HR = 5.53, 95%CI2.21-14.38; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) independently predicted reduced survival. Moreover, Stratification by EBV DNA cut-off (500 copies/ML) showed significantly higher mortality risk in the ≥ 500 group (HR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.84–4.31; P < 0.001) compared to the < 500 group (HR = 2.66, 95% CI 0.56–12.72; P = 0.22). Furthermore, Egger’s test suggested no publication bias(P = 0.111). Finally, Sensitivity analyses suggested the robustness and credibility of our results. CONCLUSIONS: High pre-treatment EBV DNA load (cut-off of ≥ 500 copies/mL) and high EBER-Positive Cell Proportion (≥ 75%) predict poor survival in ENKTL. Those quantitative EBV Biomarkers may serve as practical biomarkers for risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions in this patient population.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Agents and Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of basic, clinical, epidemiological and translational research providing an insight into the association between chronic infections and cancer.
The journal welcomes submissions in the pathogen-related cancer areas and other related topics, in particular:
• HPV and anogenital cancers, as well as head and neck cancers;
• EBV and Burkitt lymphoma;
• HCV/HBV and hepatocellular carcinoma as well as lymphoproliferative diseases;
• HHV8 and Kaposi sarcoma;
• HTLV and leukemia;
• Cancers in Low- and Middle-income countries.
The link between infection and cancer has become well established over the past 50 years, and infection-associated cancer contribute up to 16% of cancers in developed countries and 33% in less developed countries.
Preventive vaccines have been developed for only two cancer-causing viruses, highlighting both the opportunity to prevent infection-associated cancers by vaccination and the gaps that remain before vaccines can be developed for other cancer-causing agents. These gaps are due to incomplete understanding of the basic biology, natural history, epidemiology of many of the pathogens that cause cancer, the mechanisms they exploit to cause cancer, and how to interrupt progression to cancer in human populations. Early diagnosis or identification of lesions at high risk of progression represent the current most critical research area of the field supported by recent advances in genomics and proteomics technologies.