Brightness and contrast adjustments influence proximal caries detection on handheld X-ray radiographs.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2026-03-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.016
Débora Costa Ruiz, Marcyele Natane da Silva Morais, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo, Matheus Lima Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto
{"title":"Brightness and contrast adjustments influence proximal caries detection on handheld X-ray radiographs.","authors":"Débora Costa Ruiz, Marcyele Natane da Silva Morais, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo, Matheus Lima Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions in radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device. A complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor (SnapShot, Instrumentarium Imaging, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and a handheld Eagle X-ray device (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) were used to acquire radiographs of 20 mandibular molars and 20 mandibular premolars randomly arranged in 20 phantoms. The device settings were 60 kVp, 2.5 mA, and 0.45 seconds of exposure. Brightness and contrast of the resulting radiographs were modified in four combinations: a) -30% brightness and +30% contrast; b) -15% brightness and +15% contrast; c) +15% brightness and -15% contrast; and d) +30% brightness and -30% contrast. After randomization, the original radiographs and the four modified versions were individually assessed by five oral and maxillofacial radiologists to detect proximal caries lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the examiners' responses and compared with one-way analysis of variance (p<0.05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for radiographic diagnosis was assessed using the weighted kappa index. Sensitivity values for detecting proximal caries lesions on radiographs with increased brightness and decreased contrast (+ 30% brightness and -30% contrast) were significantly lower compared with the other combinations (p < 0.05), whereas AUC and specificity values were not influenced by the adjustments tested (p > 0.05). Therefore, increasing brightness and decreasing contrast on radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device is not recommended, since it may impair diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"40 ","pages":"e016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13038072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions in radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device. A complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor (SnapShot, Instrumentarium Imaging, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and a handheld Eagle X-ray device (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) were used to acquire radiographs of 20 mandibular molars and 20 mandibular premolars randomly arranged in 20 phantoms. The device settings were 60 kVp, 2.5 mA, and 0.45 seconds of exposure. Brightness and contrast of the resulting radiographs were modified in four combinations: a) -30% brightness and +30% contrast; b) -15% brightness and +15% contrast; c) +15% brightness and -15% contrast; and d) +30% brightness and -30% contrast. After randomization, the original radiographs and the four modified versions were individually assessed by five oral and maxillofacial radiologists to detect proximal caries lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the examiners' responses and compared with one-way analysis of variance (p<0.05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for radiographic diagnosis was assessed using the weighted kappa index. Sensitivity values for detecting proximal caries lesions on radiographs with increased brightness and decreased contrast (+ 30% brightness and -30% contrast) were significantly lower compared with the other combinations (p < 0.05), whereas AUC and specificity values were not influenced by the adjustments tested (p > 0.05). Therefore, increasing brightness and decreasing contrast on radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device is not recommended, since it may impair diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries lesions.

亮度和对比度调整影响手持x光片近端龋齿检测。
本研究评估了亮度和对比度调整对手持x线设备获得的x线片近端龋齿病变诊断的影响。使用互补金属氧化物半导体传感器(SnapShot, instrumarium Imaging, Milwaukee, WI, USA)和手持式Eagle x射线装置(Alliage, s o Paulo, Brazil)获取随机排列在20个幻影中的20颗下颌磨牙和20颗下颌前磨牙的x线片。器件设置为60 kVp, 2.5 mA, 0.45秒曝光。对所得x线片的亮度和对比度进行四种组合修改:a) -30%亮度和+30%对比度;B) -15%亮度+15%对比度;C) +15%亮度和-15%对比度;d) +30%亮度和-30%对比度。随机化后,由5名口腔颌面放射科医师分别评估原始x线片和4个修改版本,以检测近端龋齿病变。根据审查员的回答计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性,并进行单因素方差分析比较(p 0.05)。因此,不建议在手持x线设备拍摄的x线片上增加亮度和降低对比度,因为这可能会损害近端龋齿病变的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书