The Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy Intervention on Anthropometric Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-08 Epub Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1111/obr.70126
David Hart, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Joseph Beyene, Marwa Akola, Sarah Burrow, M. Constantine Samaan, Lehana Thabane, Adam Fleming, Donna L. Johnston, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Laura Banfield, Russell J. de Souza
{"title":"The Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy Intervention on Anthropometric Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"David Hart,&nbsp;Lawrence Mbuagbaw,&nbsp;Joseph Beyene,&nbsp;Marwa Akola,&nbsp;Sarah Burrow,&nbsp;M. Constantine Samaan,&nbsp;Lehana Thabane,&nbsp;Adam Fleming,&nbsp;Donna L. Johnston,&nbsp;Shahrad R. Rassekh,&nbsp;Laura Banfield,&nbsp;Russell J. de Souza","doi":"10.1111/obr.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Many survivors of childhood brain tumors face long-term adverse health outcomes like obesity. Uncertainties surround the effect of interventions to manage obesity-related outcomes in survivors of childhood brain tumors. The goal of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide the best estimate of the treatment efficacy of pharmacotherapy intervention on anthropometric outcomes in this pediatric population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest for articles published from January 1, 2015, to January 31, 2025. A meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse-variance method in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. We used the GRADE approach to determine the certainty of evidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria: four newly identified studies published after January 1, 2015 (125 participants), and two from the previously published review (23 participants). The pooled estimate showed no significant change in body mass index z-score after intervention (mean difference = −0.02; 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.02, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; 4 studies, 94 participants; low certainty of evidence). Similar pooled effects were observed across other outcomes; however, individual studies reported significant changes in some outcomes within the treatment groups after the intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacological agents showed no significant change in anthropometric outcomes for survivors of childhood brain tumors. Further trials are needed to assess the efficacy of pharmacological agents and to identify subgroups most likely to benefit.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obr.70126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Many survivors of childhood brain tumors face long-term adverse health outcomes like obesity. Uncertainties surround the effect of interventions to manage obesity-related outcomes in survivors of childhood brain tumors. The goal of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide the best estimate of the treatment efficacy of pharmacotherapy intervention on anthropometric outcomes in this pediatric population.

Methods

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest for articles published from January 1, 2015, to January 31, 2025. A meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse-variance method in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and the I2 statistic. We used the GRADE approach to determine the certainty of evidence.

Results

A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria: four newly identified studies published after January 1, 2015 (125 participants), and two from the previously published review (23 participants). The pooled estimate showed no significant change in body mass index z-score after intervention (mean difference = −0.02; 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.02, I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 94 participants; low certainty of evidence). Similar pooled effects were observed across other outcomes; however, individual studies reported significant changes in some outcomes within the treatment groups after the intervention.

Conclusion

Pharmacological agents showed no significant change in anthropometric outcomes for survivors of childhood brain tumors. Further trials are needed to assess the efficacy of pharmacological agents and to identify subgroups most likely to benefit.

药物治疗干预对儿童脑肿瘤幸存者人体测量结果的影响:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
许多儿童脑肿瘤的幸存者面临长期的不良健康后果,如肥胖。干预措施对儿童期脑肿瘤幸存者肥胖相关结局的影响尚不确定。这项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是提供药物治疗干预对儿科人群人体测量结果的治疗效果的最佳估计。方法:检索CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和ProQuest,检索2015年1月1日至2025年1月31日发表的文章。采用RevMan 5.4通用反方差法进行meta分析。采用Cochrane Q检验和I2统计量评估异质性。我们使用GRADE方法来确定证据的确定性。结果:共有6项研究符合纳入标准:4项新发现的研究发表于2015年1月1日之后(125名受试者),2项来自先前发表的综述(23名受试者)。合并估计显示干预后体重指数z-score无显著变化(平均差异= -0.02;95% CI: -0.06至0.02,I2 = 0%; 4项研究,94名受试者;证据确定性低)。在其他结果中也观察到类似的合并效应;然而,个别研究报告了干预后治疗组内某些结果的显著变化。结论:药物对儿童脑肿瘤幸存者的人体测量结果没有显著影响。需要进一步的试验来评估药理学药物的疗效,并确定最有可能受益的亚群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书