Comparison of Bruker Biotyper Sirius, VITEK MS PRIME, and ASTA MicroIDSys MALDI-TOF MS Systems for Cryptococcus Species Identification Across Protein Extraction Protocols.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Bosung Park,Eunsang Suh,Eun Jeong Won,Tae Yeul Kim,Hee Jae Huh,Heungsup Sung,Mi-Na Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Bruker Biotyper Sirius, VITEK MS PRIME, and ASTA MicroIDSys MALDI-TOF MS Systems for Cryptococcus Species Identification Across Protein Extraction Protocols.","authors":"Bosung Park,Eunsang Suh,Eun Jeong Won,Tae Yeul Kim,Hee Jae Huh,Heungsup Sung,Mi-Na Kim","doi":"10.3343/alm.2025.0497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\r\nAccurate and rapid identification of Cryptococcus spp. is critical for patient care. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is increasingly used for yeast identification; however, its performance varies with instrument and database coverage. We compared the performance of three MALDI-TOF MS systems-Bruker Biotyper Sirius (Sirius; Bruker Daltonics), bioMérieux VITEK MS PRIME (PRIME; bioMérieux), and ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA; ASTA Inc.)-for detecting Cryptococcus spp. across protein-extraction protocols.\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nWe analyzed 51 C. neoformans, two C. deuterogattii, five Vanrija humicola, and one Naganishia liquefaciens clinical isolates. Each isolate was tested after on-plate formic acid extraction; isolates failing identification were retested after repeat on-plate and intube extractions. The results were categorized as correct, incomplete, incorrect, or no identification against ribosomal DNA sequencing results.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nAfter initial on-plate extraction, correct identification rates were 86.4%, 88.1%, and 69.5% for Sirius, PRIME, and ASTA, respectively. After repeat on-plate extraction, ASTA accuracy increased to 81.4% (P =0.016). Additional in-tube extraction did not significantly improve identification across platforms, although PRIME outperformed ASTA (P =0.012). All platforms reliably classified C. neoformans (correct identification rates: 94%-96%) after additional on-plate extraction; discrepancies occurred mainly in uncommon species, possibly owing to gaps in database coverage.\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nSirius and PRIME demonstrated robust performance for C. neoformans identification and C. gattii complex differentiation, outperforming ASTA for relatively rare species. Single on-plate extraction is sufficient in clinical practice. However, continued database expansion is essential for maximizing MALDI-TOF MS performance and accurately identifying Cryptococcus spp., thereby informing antifungal therapy and improving patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2025.0497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Accurate and rapid identification of Cryptococcus spp. is critical for patient care. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is increasingly used for yeast identification; however, its performance varies with instrument and database coverage. We compared the performance of three MALDI-TOF MS systems-Bruker Biotyper Sirius (Sirius; Bruker Daltonics), bioMérieux VITEK MS PRIME (PRIME; bioMérieux), and ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA; ASTA Inc.)-for detecting Cryptococcus spp. across protein-extraction protocols. Methods We analyzed 51 C. neoformans, two C. deuterogattii, five Vanrija humicola, and one Naganishia liquefaciens clinical isolates. Each isolate was tested after on-plate formic acid extraction; isolates failing identification were retested after repeat on-plate and intube extractions. The results were categorized as correct, incomplete, incorrect, or no identification against ribosomal DNA sequencing results. Results After initial on-plate extraction, correct identification rates were 86.4%, 88.1%, and 69.5% for Sirius, PRIME, and ASTA, respectively. After repeat on-plate extraction, ASTA accuracy increased to 81.4% (P =0.016). Additional in-tube extraction did not significantly improve identification across platforms, although PRIME outperformed ASTA (P =0.012). All platforms reliably classified C. neoformans (correct identification rates: 94%-96%) after additional on-plate extraction; discrepancies occurred mainly in uncommon species, possibly owing to gaps in database coverage. Conclusions Sirius and PRIME demonstrated robust performance for C. neoformans identification and C. gattii complex differentiation, outperforming ASTA for relatively rare species. Single on-plate extraction is sufficient in clinical practice. However, continued database expansion is essential for maximizing MALDI-TOF MS performance and accurately identifying Cryptococcus spp., thereby informing antifungal therapy and improving patient outcomes.
Bruker Biotyper Sirius、VITEK MS PRIME和ASTA MicroIDSys MALDI-TOF MS系统在不同蛋白提取方案下隐球菌种类鉴定的比较
背景准确、快速地鉴定隐球菌对患者的护理至关重要。基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱法(MALDI-TOF MS)越来越多地用于酵母鉴定;但是,它的性能随仪器和数据库的覆盖而变化。我们比较了三种MALDI-TOF质谱系统——Bruker Biotyper Sirius (Sirius; Bruker Daltonics)、biomacrieux VITEK MS PRIME (PRIME; biomacrieux)和ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA; ASTA Inc.)——在蛋白质提取方案中检测隐球菌的性能。方法对51株新生荚膜荚膜菌、2株后肠荚膜荚膜菌、5株humicola Vanrija和1株Naganishia液化菌临床分离株进行分析。每个分离物经板上甲酸提取后检测;鉴定失败的分离株在板上和管内重复提取后重新检测。结果被分类为正确,不完整,不正确,或没有识别核糖体DNA测序结果。结果初步板上提取后,天狼星、PRIME和ASTA的正确率分别为86.4%、88.1%和69.5%。重复板上提取后,ASTA准确度提高至81.4% (P =0.016)。尽管PRIME优于ASTA (P =0.012),但额外的管内提取并没有显著提高不同平台的识别能力。附加板上提取后,所有平台对新形态C.进行了可靠分类(正确率为94%-96%);差异主要发生在不常见的物种,可能是由于数据库覆盖范围的差距。结论sirius和PRIME对新生C. formans和C. gatti复合体的鉴别效果较好,对较为罕见的C. gatti复合体的鉴别效果优于ASTA。在临床实践中,单个板上提取是足够的。然而,持续的数据库扩展对于最大化MALDI-TOF MS性能和准确识别隐球菌至关重要,从而为抗真菌治疗提供信息并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书