Roberto Contieri, Paolo Gontero, Rodolfo Hurle, Luca Afferi, Simone Albisinni, Marek Babjuk, Alison Birtle, Peter Black, Maurizio Brausi, Max Bruins, Otakar Čapoun, Albert Carrion, James Catto, Ananya Choudhury, Alessia Cimadamore, Eva Comperat, Siamak Daneshmand, David D’andrea, Francesco Del Giudice, Jose Luis Domínguez Escrig, Patrick Hensley, Wojciech Krajewski, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Roger Li, Fredrik Liedberg, Yair Lotan, Gautier Marcq, Paramananthan Mariappan, Andrea Mari, Alberto Martini, Alexandra Masson Lecomte, Richard Meijer, Maria Carmen Mir, Keiichiro Mori, Marco Moschini, Hugh Mostafid, Micheal O’Donnell, Joan Palou, Valeria Panebianco, Sisto Perdonà, Sima Porten, Sarah Psutka, Michael Rink, Morgan Roupret, Thomas Seisen, Mark Soloway, Viktor Soukup, Gary Steinberg, Arnulf Stenzl, Jeremy YC Teoh, Karl Tully, Toine van der Heijden, Bas W. G. van Rhijn, Alfred Witjes, Evanguelos Xylinas, Ashish M. Kamat, Benjamin Pradere, Laura S. Mertens
{"title":"Active surveillance in low-grade NMIBC — results of an international two-round modified Delphi consensus","authors":"Roberto Contieri, Paolo Gontero, Rodolfo Hurle, Luca Afferi, Simone Albisinni, Marek Babjuk, Alison Birtle, Peter Black, Maurizio Brausi, Max Bruins, Otakar Čapoun, Albert Carrion, James Catto, Ananya Choudhury, Alessia Cimadamore, Eva Comperat, Siamak Daneshmand, David D’andrea, Francesco Del Giudice, Jose Luis Domínguez Escrig, Patrick Hensley, Wojciech Krajewski, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Roger Li, Fredrik Liedberg, Yair Lotan, Gautier Marcq, Paramananthan Mariappan, Andrea Mari, Alberto Martini, Alexandra Masson Lecomte, Richard Meijer, Maria Carmen Mir, Keiichiro Mori, Marco Moschini, Hugh Mostafid, Micheal O’Donnell, Joan Palou, Valeria Panebianco, Sisto Perdonà, Sima Porten, Sarah Psutka, Michael Rink, Morgan Roupret, Thomas Seisen, Mark Soloway, Viktor Soukup, Gary Steinberg, Arnulf Stenzl, Jeremy YC Teoh, Karl Tully, Toine van der Heijden, Bas W. G. van Rhijn, Alfred Witjes, Evanguelos Xylinas, Ashish M. Kamat, Benjamin Pradere, Laura S. Mertens","doi":"10.1038/s41585-026-01137-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard management for recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (LG-NMIBC) often involves a substantial treatment burden, which is not justified by the relatively indolent course of the disease, prompting a need for de-intensification strategies. Active surveillance (AS) is an alternative approach aimed at reducing overtreatment in selected patients. However, the broader adoption of AS is hindered by a lack of standardized protocols for patient selection, monitoring and intervention. To address this gap, we conducted an international, two-round Delphi consensus among 51 bladder cancer experts to establish foundational statements for the use of AS. Consensus was achieved on 20 statements, providing clear recommendations for terminology; inclusion and exclusion criteria; follow-up monitoring; and exit criteria. This Delphi consensus provides the first expert-driven framework to standardize the clinical application of AS for LG-NMIBC. These statements could guide current clinical practice and unify the design of future trials. This article provides consensus-based statements from an international panel of bladder cancer experts on the use of active surveillance in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Consensus statements cover several aspects of active surveillance, including terminology, eligibility criteria and treatment triggers, providing a framework to guide clinical practice and trial design in this space.","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":"23 10","pages":"691-696"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-026-01137-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-026-01137-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Standard management for recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (LG-NMIBC) often involves a substantial treatment burden, which is not justified by the relatively indolent course of the disease, prompting a need for de-intensification strategies. Active surveillance (AS) is an alternative approach aimed at reducing overtreatment in selected patients. However, the broader adoption of AS is hindered by a lack of standardized protocols for patient selection, monitoring and intervention. To address this gap, we conducted an international, two-round Delphi consensus among 51 bladder cancer experts to establish foundational statements for the use of AS. Consensus was achieved on 20 statements, providing clear recommendations for terminology; inclusion and exclusion criteria; follow-up monitoring; and exit criteria. This Delphi consensus provides the first expert-driven framework to standardize the clinical application of AS for LG-NMIBC. These statements could guide current clinical practice and unify the design of future trials. This article provides consensus-based statements from an international panel of bladder cancer experts on the use of active surveillance in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Consensus statements cover several aspects of active surveillance, including terminology, eligibility criteria and treatment triggers, providing a framework to guide clinical practice and trial design in this space.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline.
The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals.
Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.