Integrated endoscopy: a new method for improving the diagnostic accuracy of Helicobacter pylori infection status.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Report Pub Date : 2026-03-29 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1093/gastro/goag027
Dong Yang, Nan Zhang, Ke Tao, Meng Li, Hong Xu
{"title":"Integrated endoscopy: a new method for improving the diagnostic accuracy of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection status.","authors":"Dong Yang, Nan Zhang, Ke Tao, Meng Li, Hong Xu","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goag027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We proposed an integrated endoscopic strategy and compared it with conventional methods to assess whether it improves the diagnostic accuracy of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort (between 1 August 2022 and 30 April 2024; <i>n</i> = 163) was used to compare white light endoscopy (WLE) and magnifying endoscopy (ME) and to prespecify the integrated endoscopy (IE) algorithm. IE first uses ME to grade the proportion of fundic crypt openings and then applies WLE features to classify <i>H. pylori</i> status. A prospective cohort (between 1 May 2024 and 30 December 2024; <i>n</i> = 221) applied the locked IE algorithm and compared its performance with WLE and ME. The primary outcome was overall diagnostic accuracy; secondary outcomes were accuracy for each infection status category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the retrospective cohort, IE achieved higher overall accuracy than WLE and ME (79.8% vs 69.9% and 71.8%, respectively), with improved accuracy for negative (85.4%) and eradicated status (72.5%). ME was more accurate than WLE for negative (82.9% vs 61.0%) and eradicated status (62.7% vs 52.9%), whereas WLE was more accurate for positive status (87.3% vs 71.8%). In the prospective cohort, IE again showed the highest overall accuracy (86.4% vs 70.6% for WLE and 72.9% for ME), with higher accuracy for negative (90.7%) and eradicated status (92.4%), while WLE maintained higher accuracy for positive status (89.8% vs 78.4% for IE).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IE that combines ME-based fundic crypt opening assessment with WLE features may improve endoscopic classification of overall, negative, and eradicated <i>H. pylori</i> infection status compared with WLE or ME alone. These findings support IE as a promising diagnostic approach that warrants further multicenter confirmation. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06397066.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"14 ","pages":"goag027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13033319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goag027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We proposed an integrated endoscopic strategy and compared it with conventional methods to assess whether it improves the diagnostic accuracy of Helicobacter pylori infection status.

Methods: A retrospective cohort (between 1 August 2022 and 30 April 2024; n = 163) was used to compare white light endoscopy (WLE) and magnifying endoscopy (ME) and to prespecify the integrated endoscopy (IE) algorithm. IE first uses ME to grade the proportion of fundic crypt openings and then applies WLE features to classify H. pylori status. A prospective cohort (between 1 May 2024 and 30 December 2024; n = 221) applied the locked IE algorithm and compared its performance with WLE and ME. The primary outcome was overall diagnostic accuracy; secondary outcomes were accuracy for each infection status category.

Results: In the retrospective cohort, IE achieved higher overall accuracy than WLE and ME (79.8% vs 69.9% and 71.8%, respectively), with improved accuracy for negative (85.4%) and eradicated status (72.5%). ME was more accurate than WLE for negative (82.9% vs 61.0%) and eradicated status (62.7% vs 52.9%), whereas WLE was more accurate for positive status (87.3% vs 71.8%). In the prospective cohort, IE again showed the highest overall accuracy (86.4% vs 70.6% for WLE and 72.9% for ME), with higher accuracy for negative (90.7%) and eradicated status (92.4%), while WLE maintained higher accuracy for positive status (89.8% vs 78.4% for IE).

Conclusion: IE that combines ME-based fundic crypt opening assessment with WLE features may improve endoscopic classification of overall, negative, and eradicated H. pylori infection status compared with WLE or ME alone. These findings support IE as a promising diagnostic approach that warrants further multicenter confirmation. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06397066.).

综合内镜:提高幽门螺杆菌感染状态诊断准确性的新方法。
目的:我们提出了一种综合内镜策略,并将其与常规方法进行比较,以评估其是否提高了幽门螺杆菌感染状态的诊断准确性。方法:采用回顾性队列(2022年8月1日至2024年4月30日,n = 163),比较白光内镜(WLE)和放大内镜(ME),并预先确定综合内镜(IE)算法。IE首先使用ME对基底隐窝开口的比例进行分级,然后应用WLE特征对幽门螺杆菌状态进行分类。前瞻性队列(2024年5月1日至2024年12月30日,n = 221)应用锁定IE算法,并将其与WLE和ME的性能进行比较。主要结局是总体诊断准确性;次要结果是每种感染状态类别的准确性。结果:在回顾性队列中,IE的总体准确性高于WLE和ME(分别为79.8%对69.9%和71.8%),阴性和根除状态的准确性提高(85.4%)(72.5%)。对于阴性(82.9%对61.0%)和根除状态(62.7%对52.9%),ME比WLE更准确,而对于阳性状态(87.3%对71.8%),WLE更准确。在前瞻性队列中,IE再次显示出最高的总体准确率(86.4%比WLE的70.6%和ME的72.9%),阴性(90.7%)和根除状态(92.4%)的准确率更高,而WLE对阳性状态保持更高的准确率(89.8%比IE的78.4%)。结论:与单独使用WLE或ME相比,IE结合基于ME的基底窝开放评估与WLE特征可以改善幽门螺杆菌感染的内镜分类,整体,阴性和根除。这些发现支持IE作为一种有前途的诊断方法,值得进一步的多中心确认。(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06397066)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Report
Gastroenterology Report Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书