Target Trial Emulation Without Matching: A More Efficient Approach for Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness Using Observational Data.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-30 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001982
Emily Wu, Elizabeth Rogawski McQuade, Mats J Stensrud, Razieh Nabi, David Benkeser
{"title":"Target Trial Emulation Without Matching: A More Efficient Approach for Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness Using Observational Data.","authors":"Emily Wu, Elizabeth Rogawski McQuade, Mats J Stensrud, Razieh Nabi, David Benkeser","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) has increasingly been studied using matching-based approaches, particularly in observational cohort studies that follow the target trial emulation framework. Although matching is appealing in its simplicity, it has important limitations in terms of clarity of the target estimand and the precision with which it is estimated. Moreover, defining causal estimands of VE requires care, because vaccine uptake often occurs over calendar time when infection dynamics may also be rapidly changing. We propose a causal estimand of VE that summarizes VE over calendar time, similar to how vaccine efficacy is summarized in randomized controlled trials. We describe the identification of our estimand and propose simple-to-implement estimators based on two hazard regression models. We apply our proposed estimator in simulations and in a study assessing the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections in children 5-11 years old. In both settings, we find that our proposed estimator yields similar scientific inferences while providing significant efficiency gains over commonly used matching-based estimators.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"612-619"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) has increasingly been studied using matching-based approaches, particularly in observational cohort studies that follow the target trial emulation framework. Although matching is appealing in its simplicity, it has important limitations in terms of clarity of the target estimand and the precision with which it is estimated. Moreover, defining causal estimands of VE requires care, because vaccine uptake often occurs over calendar time when infection dynamics may also be rapidly changing. We propose a causal estimand of VE that summarizes VE over calendar time, similar to how vaccine efficacy is summarized in randomized controlled trials. We describe the identification of our estimand and propose simple-to-implement estimators based on two hazard regression models. We apply our proposed estimator in simulations and in a study assessing the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections in children 5-11 years old. In both settings, we find that our proposed estimator yields similar scientific inferences while providing significant efficiency gains over commonly used matching-based estimators.

不匹配的目标试验模拟:利用观察数据评估疫苗有效性的更有效方法。
越来越多地使用基于匹配的方法研究真实世界的疫苗有效性,特别是在遵循目标试验模拟框架的观察性队列研究中。尽管匹配以其简单性吸引人,但就目标估计的清晰度和估计的精度而言,它具有重要的局限性。此外,确定疫苗有效性的因果估计需要谨慎,因为疫苗摄取通常在日历时间内发生,而感染动态也可能迅速变化。我们提出了一种疫苗有效性的因果估计,总结了疫苗在日历时间内的有效性,类似于在随机对照试验中总结疫苗有效性的方法。我们描述了我们估计的识别,并提出了基于两个风险回归模型的简单实现估计器。我们将我们提出的估计量应用于模拟和评估辉瑞- biontech COVID-19疫苗预防5-11岁儿童感染SARS-CoV-2的有效性的研究中。在这两种情况下,我们发现我们提出的估计器产生了类似的科学推断,同时比常用的基于匹配的估计器提供了显著的效率提升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书