Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation of the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills-Revised and the Assessment of Functional Living Skills

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Thomas W. Frazier, Nissa Van Etten, Richard M. Kubina Jr., Allison Frazier, Michael Mueller, Mirko Uljarevic
{"title":"Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation of the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills-Revised and the Assessment of Functional Living Skills","authors":"Thomas W. Frazier,&nbsp;Nissa Van Etten,&nbsp;Richard M. Kubina Jr.,&nbsp;Allison Frazier,&nbsp;Michael Mueller,&nbsp;Mirko Uljarevic","doi":"10.1002/bin.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neurodevelopmental disabilities, including autism spectrum disorder, have increased in prevalence, highlighting the need for reliable and valid instruments that guide behavioral interventions. This study reports a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills–Revised (ABLLS-R) and the Assessment of Functional Living Skills (AFLS). Strong unidimensionality, adequate or better reliability, and good convergent and known-groups validity were hypothesized across content areas. Using assessment data from 41,912 unique individuals (89,733 total administrations), multiple reliability and validity analyses were conducted. Most content areas showed unidimensionality, excellent internal consistency (<i>α</i> ≥ 0.88), and fair to excellent test–retest reliability (all ABLLS-R <i>r</i><sub>xx</sub> ≥ 0.40 and all AFLS <i>r</i><sub>xx</sub> ≥ 0.60). The correlation between ABLLS-R and AFLS total scores was high (<i>r</i> = 0.82). Known-groups validity was supported, with expected differences between individuals with and without intellectual disability. Results demonstrated that the ABLLS-R and AFLS have strong psychometric properties, supporting their utility in intervention planning and progress monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bin.70092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disabilities, including autism spectrum disorder, have increased in prevalence, highlighting the need for reliable and valid instruments that guide behavioral interventions. This study reports a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills–Revised (ABLLS-R) and the Assessment of Functional Living Skills (AFLS). Strong unidimensionality, adequate or better reliability, and good convergent and known-groups validity were hypothesized across content areas. Using assessment data from 41,912 unique individuals (89,733 total administrations), multiple reliability and validity analyses were conducted. Most content areas showed unidimensionality, excellent internal consistency (α ≥ 0.88), and fair to excellent test–retest reliability (all ABLLS-R rxx ≥ 0.40 and all AFLS rxx ≥ 0.60). The correlation between ABLLS-R and AFLS total scores was high (r = 0.82). Known-groups validity was supported, with expected differences between individuals with and without intellectual disability. Results demonstrated that the ABLLS-R and AFLS have strong psychometric properties, supporting their utility in intervention planning and progress monitoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基本语言和学习技能评估的综合心理测量学评价-修订和功能生活技能评估
包括自闭症谱系障碍在内的神经发育障碍的患病率有所上升,这突出表明需要可靠和有效的工具来指导行为干预。本研究报告了对基本语言和学习技能评估-修订版(abls - r)和功能生活技能评估(AFLS)的综合心理测量评估。假设内容领域具有强的单维性,足够或更好的信度,以及良好的收敛效度和已知组效度。使用来自41,912个独立个体(共89,733个用药组)的评估数据,进行了多重信度和效度分析。大多数内容区域表现为单维性,具有良好的内部一致性(α≥0.88),具有良好的重测信度(所有abls - r rxx≥0.40,所有AFLS rxx≥0.60)。abls - r与AFLS总分相关性较高(r = 0.82)。已知群体效度得到支持,有智力障碍和没有智力障碍的个体之间存在预期的差异。结果表明,abls - r和AFLS具有较强的心理测量特性,支持其在干预计划和进展监测中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书