Comparison of the effects of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine during interventional brachytherapy: A double-blind, randomized crossover study.

IF 1.3
Prateek Maurya, Surjyendu Ghosh, Nishkarsh Gupta, Raghav Gupta, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand J Bharati, Vinod Kumar, Brajesh K Ratre, Saurabh Vig, Prashant Sirohiya, Karun Kamboj, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine during interventional brachytherapy: A double-blind, randomized crossover study.","authors":"Prateek Maurya, Surjyendu Ghosh, Nishkarsh Gupta, Raghav Gupta, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand J Bharati, Vinod Kumar, Brajesh K Ratre, Saurabh Vig, Prashant Sirohiya, Karun Kamboj, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2101_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice of intrathecal local anesthetic influences discharge readiness and brachytherapy success. Evidence comparing hyperbaric bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized crossover study, 40 women undergoing three brachytherapy sessions received, in random order, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.5%, levobupivacaine 0.5%, or bupivacaine 0.75%, with ≥1 week between sessions. Sensory and motor block onset/duration, hemodynamic variables, and complications were monitored. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ropivacaine produced the fastest sensory block (2.68 ± 0.20 min) versus levobupivacaine (2.72 ± 0.18 min) and bupivacaine (2.84 ± 0.22 min); the difference between ropivacaine and bupivacaine was -0.16 min (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.25 to -0.07). Sensory block lasted 57.2 ± 8.6, 58.5 ± 9.3, and 61.3 ± 7.7 min, respectively; ropivacaine shortened duration by 4.1 min versus bupivacaine (95%CI -7.7 to -0.5). Motor block onset was fastest with levobupivacaine (4.99 ± 0.50 min), followed by bupivacaine (5.41 ± 0.35 min) and ropivacaine (5.70 ± 0.25 min). Motor block lasted 60 ± 8.8, 62 ± 8.3, and 66 ± 5.0 min, respectively. Hypotension within 10 min occurred in 17.5%, 40%, and 85% with levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine; tachycardia occurred in 15%, 35%, and 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three agents provided effective spinal anesthesia for brachytherapy. Ropivacaine offered the shortest sensory/motor blocks; levobupivacaine afforded the most stable cardiovascular profile. Bupivacaine produced longer blocks but higher hypotension/tachycardia rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"22 1","pages":"90-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2101_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The choice of intrathecal local anesthetic influences discharge readiness and brachytherapy success. Evidence comparing hyperbaric bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine is limited.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized crossover study, 40 women undergoing three brachytherapy sessions received, in random order, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.5%, levobupivacaine 0.5%, or bupivacaine 0.75%, with ≥1 week between sessions. Sensory and motor block onset/duration, hemodynamic variables, and complications were monitored. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests.

Results: Ropivacaine produced the fastest sensory block (2.68 ± 0.20 min) versus levobupivacaine (2.72 ± 0.18 min) and bupivacaine (2.84 ± 0.22 min); the difference between ropivacaine and bupivacaine was -0.16 min (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.25 to -0.07). Sensory block lasted 57.2 ± 8.6, 58.5 ± 9.3, and 61.3 ± 7.7 min, respectively; ropivacaine shortened duration by 4.1 min versus bupivacaine (95%CI -7.7 to -0.5). Motor block onset was fastest with levobupivacaine (4.99 ± 0.50 min), followed by bupivacaine (5.41 ± 0.35 min) and ropivacaine (5.70 ± 0.25 min). Motor block lasted 60 ± 8.8, 62 ± 8.3, and 66 ± 5.0 min, respectively. Hypotension within 10 min occurred in 17.5%, 40%, and 85% with levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine; tachycardia occurred in 15%, 35%, and 80%.

Conclusions: All three agents provided effective spinal anesthesia for brachytherapy. Ropivacaine offered the shortest sensory/motor blocks; levobupivacaine afforded the most stable cardiovascular profile. Bupivacaine produced longer blocks but higher hypotension/tachycardia rates.

介入近距离放射治疗中鞘内高压布比卡因、左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因的效果比较:一项双盲、随机交叉研究。
背景:鞘内局麻药的选择影响出院准备和近距离治疗的成功。比较高压压布比卡因、左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因的证据有限。方法:在这项双盲、随机交叉研究中,40名接受三次近距离放射治疗的女性,随机顺序接受鞘内高压0.5%罗哌卡因、0.5%左旋布比卡因或0.75%布比卡因,每次治疗间隔≥1周。监测感觉和运动阻滞的发生/持续时间、血流动力学变量和并发症。数据分析采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和卡方检验。结果:罗哌卡因产生感觉阻滞最快(2.68±0.20 min),左旋布比卡因(2.72±0.18 min)和布比卡因(2.84±0.22 min);罗哌卡因与布比卡因的差异为-0.16 min(95%可信区间(CI) -0.25 ~ -0.07)。感觉阻滞时间分别为57.2±8.6、58.5±9.3和61.3±7.7 min;与布比卡因相比,罗哌卡因缩短了4.1分钟的持续时间(95%CI为-7.7至-0.5)。左布比卡因组运动阻滞起效最快(4.99±0.50 min),其次为布比卡因组(5.41±0.35 min)和罗哌卡因组(5.70±0.25 min)。运动阻滞时间分别为60±8.8 min、62±8.3 min和66±5.0 min。左旋布比卡因、罗哌卡因和布比卡因在10分钟内出现低血压的比例分别为17.5%、40%和85%;心动过速发生率分别为15%、35%和80%。结论:三种药物均可为近距离治疗提供有效的脊髓麻醉。罗哌卡因的感觉/运动阻滞时间最短;左布比卡因提供了最稳定的心血管特征。布比卡因阻滞时间较长,但低血压/心动过速率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书