Assessing effects of vibroacoustic stimulation compared to a guided mindfulness meditation using the biosignal of human speech.

IF 3
Frontiers in network physiology Pub Date : 2026-03-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnetp.2026.1677209
Charlotte Fooks, Oliver Niebuhr
{"title":"Assessing effects of vibroacoustic stimulation compared to a guided mindfulness meditation using the biosignal of human speech.","authors":"Charlotte Fooks, Oliver Niebuhr","doi":"10.3389/fnetp.2026.1677209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High stress and low wellbeing pose severe individual, societal and economic threats, and there is a pressing demand for non-invasive stress reduction tools. This exploratory pilot study assessed the efficacy of speech prosody as a biosignal for stress elicitation, when comparing relaxation outcomes of two interventions with a control group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty participants were divided into three treatment groups; (1) guided mindfulness meditation (2) vibroacoustic intervention (3) control. All participants read aloud a text before and after one 20-min treatment. The sixty readings were assessed using a multi-parametric acoustic-prosodic analysis, and within-speaker differences were compared between the initial and final reading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show groups (1) and (2) spoke with a breathier vocal quality in the second reading, while group (3) speech was tenser and at a lower, less variable loudness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results demonstrate speech prosody is a sensitive biomarker for treatment-effect classification and evaluation. Practical limitations and future research perspectives are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73092,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in network physiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1677209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13021403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in network physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2026.1677209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High stress and low wellbeing pose severe individual, societal and economic threats, and there is a pressing demand for non-invasive stress reduction tools. This exploratory pilot study assessed the efficacy of speech prosody as a biosignal for stress elicitation, when comparing relaxation outcomes of two interventions with a control group.

Method: Thirty participants were divided into three treatment groups; (1) guided mindfulness meditation (2) vibroacoustic intervention (3) control. All participants read aloud a text before and after one 20-min treatment. The sixty readings were assessed using a multi-parametric acoustic-prosodic analysis, and within-speaker differences were compared between the initial and final reading.

Results: Results show groups (1) and (2) spoke with a breathier vocal quality in the second reading, while group (3) speech was tenser and at a lower, less variable loudness.

Discussion: Results demonstrate speech prosody is a sensitive biomarker for treatment-effect classification and evaluation. Practical limitations and future research perspectives are discussed.

评估振动声刺激与使用人类语言生物信号引导的正念冥想的效果。
引言:高压力和低幸福感对个人、社会和经济构成严重威胁,对非侵入性减压工具的需求迫切。本探索性初步研究评估了语音韵律作为应激诱发生物信号的有效性,并将两种干预措施的放松结果与对照组进行了比较。方法:30例患者分为3个治疗组;(1)引导正念冥想(2)振声干预(3)控制。在20分钟的治疗前后,所有参与者都大声朗读一篇文章。使用多参数声学韵律分析对60个读数进行评估,并比较初始和最终读数之间的扬声器内差异。结果:结果显示(1)组和(2)组在第二次阅读时说话的声音质量更呼吸,而(3)组说话的声音更紧张,音量更低,变化更少。讨论:结果表明语音韵律是治疗效果分类和评价的敏感生物标志物。讨论了实际限制和未来的研究前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书