{"title":"Defense and disaster medicine: civil contingencies and natural disasters in Swedish civil defense.","authors":"Fredrik Bertilsson","doi":"10.1093/jhmas/jrag010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As in many other countries, Swedish defense during the Cold War was primarily organized around the perceived threat of war, including the potential use of nuclear weapons. This article shifts attention from such scenarios to the ways in which civil contingencies and natural disasters were conceptualized as knowledge objects within the emerging field of defense and disaster medicine. Their incorporation into Sweden's preparedness agenda signaled a broader and more multifaceted understanding of protection and security within the scientific advisory system of the Swedish defense. By centering medical knowledge production on these hazards, the article offers new insights into the role of medical expertise in Swedish preparedness, while simultaneously shifting focus away from a war-centered narrative of Cold War defense investments. The empirical exploration spans the period from the late 1950s, when a comprehensive governmental inquiry into Swedish defense medicine led to the establishment of the Delegation for Applied Medical Defense Research [Försvarsmedicinska forskningsdelegationen] and subsequently the Organizing Committee for Disaster Medicine [Katastrofmedicinska organisationskommittén] (Kamedo) in the first half of the 1960s. The study concludes in the mid-1970s, when the Delegation was incorporated into the Swedish Defense Research Establishment [Försvarets forskningsanstalt] (FOA).</p>","PeriodicalId":49998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrag010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As in many other countries, Swedish defense during the Cold War was primarily organized around the perceived threat of war, including the potential use of nuclear weapons. This article shifts attention from such scenarios to the ways in which civil contingencies and natural disasters were conceptualized as knowledge objects within the emerging field of defense and disaster medicine. Their incorporation into Sweden's preparedness agenda signaled a broader and more multifaceted understanding of protection and security within the scientific advisory system of the Swedish defense. By centering medical knowledge production on these hazards, the article offers new insights into the role of medical expertise in Swedish preparedness, while simultaneously shifting focus away from a war-centered narrative of Cold War defense investments. The empirical exploration spans the period from the late 1950s, when a comprehensive governmental inquiry into Swedish defense medicine led to the establishment of the Delegation for Applied Medical Defense Research [Försvarsmedicinska forskningsdelegationen] and subsequently the Organizing Committee for Disaster Medicine [Katastrofmedicinska organisationskommittén] (Kamedo) in the first half of the 1960s. The study concludes in the mid-1970s, when the Delegation was incorporated into the Swedish Defense Research Establishment [Försvarets forskningsanstalt] (FOA).
期刊介绍:
Started in 1946, the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences is internationally recognized as one of the top publications in its field. The journal''s coverage is broad, publishing the latest original research on the written beginnings of medicine in all its aspects. When possible and appropriate, it focuses on what practitioners of the healing arts did or taught, and how their peers, as well as patients, received and interpreted their efforts.
Subscribers include clinicians and hospital libraries, as well as academic and public historians.