Patient-Centered Selection Criteria for Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke: A Focus of User Satisfaction.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-29 DOI:10.1177/10538135261436050
Jong Weon Lee, Won Hyuk Chang, Tae-Woo Kim, Hyoung Seop Kim, Fazah Akhtar Hanapiah, Seung-Hyeon Han, Chai Wen Jia, Dae Hyun Kim, Deog Young Kim
{"title":"Patient-Centered Selection Criteria for Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke: A Focus of User Satisfaction.","authors":"Jong Weon Lee, Won Hyuk Chang, Tae-Woo Kim, Hyoung Seop Kim, Fazah Akhtar Hanapiah, Seung-Hyeon Han, Chai Wen Jia, Dae Hyun Kim, Deog Young Kim","doi":"10.1177/10538135261436050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo identify patient-centered selection criteria for exoskeletal wearable robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) by investigating predictors of satisfaction in subacute stroke survivors.Materials and MethodsIn this subgroup analysis of an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 58 inpatients completed a 4-week RAGT program (20 sessions). Satisfaction was assessed using a modified 15-item QUEST 2.0 questionnaire across five domains (appropriateness, effectiveness, convenience, conformance, reliability). Predictors of the mean satisfaction score were analyzed using multiple linear regression.ResultsThe overall satisfaction questionnaire score was 3.9 ± 0.6 (out of 5). The effectiveness domain was rated significantly higher than other domains (p < 0.05). Age was the only significant independent predictor of satisfaction (β = -0.269; 95% CI -0.315 to -0.007; p < 0.05). Participants aged <65 years reported significantly higher overall satisfaction than those aged ≥65 years (p < 0.05). This difference was driven by the appropriateness domain, where older adults reported lower comfort scores (p < 0.05).ConclusionRAGT received high user ratings, particularly for effectiveness. However, younger age predicted greater satisfaction, primarily due to discomfort in older adults. Selection criteria should consider age, and strategies to mitigate discomfort in older adults are needed to maximize adherence.<b>Trial details</b>: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT05157347 (first registration (10/12/2021)).</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"600-611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261436050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo identify patient-centered selection criteria for exoskeletal wearable robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) by investigating predictors of satisfaction in subacute stroke survivors.Materials and MethodsIn this subgroup analysis of an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 58 inpatients completed a 4-week RAGT program (20 sessions). Satisfaction was assessed using a modified 15-item QUEST 2.0 questionnaire across five domains (appropriateness, effectiveness, convenience, conformance, reliability). Predictors of the mean satisfaction score were analyzed using multiple linear regression.ResultsThe overall satisfaction questionnaire score was 3.9 ± 0.6 (out of 5). The effectiveness domain was rated significantly higher than other domains (p < 0.05). Age was the only significant independent predictor of satisfaction (β = -0.269; 95% CI -0.315 to -0.007; p < 0.05). Participants aged <65 years reported significantly higher overall satisfaction than those aged ≥65 years (p < 0.05). This difference was driven by the appropriateness domain, where older adults reported lower comfort scores (p < 0.05).ConclusionRAGT received high user ratings, particularly for effectiveness. However, younger age predicted greater satisfaction, primarily due to discomfort in older adults. Selection criteria should consider age, and strategies to mitigate discomfort in older adults are needed to maximize adherence.Trial details: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT05157347 (first registration (10/12/2021)).

亚急性中风中机器人辅助步态训练的以患者为中心的选择标准:用户满意度的焦点。
目的通过调查亚急性脑卒中幸存者满意度的预测因素,确定以患者为中心的外骨骼可穿戴机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)的选择标准。材料和方法在一项国际、多中心、随机对照试验的亚组分析中,58名住院患者完成了为期4周的RAGT计划(20次)。满意度评估使用修改后的15项QUEST 2.0问卷,涵盖5个领域(适当性、有效性、便利性、一致性、可靠性)。使用多元线性回归分析平均满意度评分的预测因子。结果满意度问卷总得分为3.9±0.6分(满分5分)。有效性域的评分明显高于其他域(p试验详细信息:ClinicalTrial.gov标识符NCT05157347(首次注册(10/12/2021))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书