Assessing the Performance and Reliability of Deep Learning Autosegmentation in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Wei-Kai Chuang MD, Bing-Fong Lin PhD, Yu-Hao Lee MD, Po-Hsun Su, Yung-Shuo Kao MD, Chia-Feng Lu PhD
{"title":"Assessing the Performance and Reliability of Deep Learning Autosegmentation in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Wei-Kai Chuang MD, Bing-Fong Lin PhD, Yu-Hao Lee MD, Po-Hsun Su, Yung-Shuo Kao MD, Chia-Feng Lu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2026.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning–based autosegmentation methods in videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) through meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English between 2013 and 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Studies were included if they applied deep learning techniques to the autosegmentation of anatomical structures in VFSS, specifically the bolus, cervical spine, hyoid bone, or thyroid cartilage-vocal fold complex, and reported quantitative performance metrics such as the Dice similarity coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, segmentation targets, deep learning model types, and performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis yielded an overall pooled Dice score of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88; <em>I</em>²=77%). Subgroup analyses showed similar performance for bolus segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92; <em>I</em>²=74%) and cervical spine segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91; <em>I</em>²=87%). Despite high accuracy, substantial heterogeneity was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning–based autosegmentation in VFSS demonstrates promising accuracy across different anatomical targets. However, methodological variability among studies underscores the need for standardized protocols, multicenter datasets, and comparative evaluations of model architectures to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 10","pages":"Pages 2963-2972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999326006258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To systematically evaluate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning–based autosegmentation methods in videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) through meta-analysis.
Data Sources
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English between 2013 and 2025.
Study Selection
Studies were included if they applied deep learning techniques to the autosegmentation of anatomical structures in VFSS, specifically the bolus, cervical spine, hyoid bone, or thyroid cartilage-vocal fold complex, and reported quantitative performance metrics such as the Dice similarity coefficient.
Data Extraction
Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, segmentation targets, deep learning model types, and performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools.
Data Synthesis
Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis yielded an overall pooled Dice score of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88; I²=77%). Subgroup analyses showed similar performance for bolus segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92; I²=74%) and cervical spine segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91; I²=87%). Despite high accuracy, substantial heterogeneity was observed.
Conclusions
Deep learning–based autosegmentation in VFSS demonstrates promising accuracy across different anatomical targets. However, methodological variability among studies underscores the need for standardized protocols, multicenter datasets, and comparative evaluations of model architectures to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.