Assessing the Performance and Reliability of Deep Learning Autosegmentation in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Wei-Kai Chuang MD, Bing-Fong Lin PhD, Yu-Hao Lee MD, Po-Hsun Su, Yung-Shuo Kao MD, Chia-Feng Lu PhD
{"title":"Assessing the Performance and Reliability of Deep Learning Autosegmentation in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Wei-Kai Chuang MD,&nbsp;Bing-Fong Lin PhD,&nbsp;Yu-Hao Lee MD,&nbsp;Po-Hsun Su,&nbsp;Yung-Shuo Kao MD,&nbsp;Chia-Feng Lu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2026.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning–based autosegmentation methods in videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) through meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English between 2013 and 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Studies were included if they applied deep learning techniques to the autosegmentation of anatomical structures in VFSS, specifically the bolus, cervical spine, hyoid bone, or thyroid cartilage-vocal fold complex, and reported quantitative performance metrics such as the Dice similarity coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, segmentation targets, deep learning model types, and performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis yielded an overall pooled Dice score of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88; <em>I</em>²=77%). Subgroup analyses showed similar performance for bolus segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92; <em>I</em>²=74%) and cervical spine segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91; <em>I</em>²=87%). Despite high accuracy, substantial heterogeneity was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning–based autosegmentation in VFSS demonstrates promising accuracy across different anatomical targets. However, methodological variability among studies underscores the need for standardized protocols, multicenter datasets, and comparative evaluations of model architectures to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 10","pages":"Pages 2963-2972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999326006258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically evaluate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning–based autosegmentation methods in videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) through meta-analysis.

Data Sources

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English between 2013 and 2025.

Study Selection

Studies were included if they applied deep learning techniques to the autosegmentation of anatomical structures in VFSS, specifically the bolus, cervical spine, hyoid bone, or thyroid cartilage-vocal fold complex, and reported quantitative performance metrics such as the Dice similarity coefficient.

Data Extraction

Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, segmentation targets, deep learning model types, and performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools.

Data Synthesis

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis yielded an overall pooled Dice score of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88; I²=77%). Subgroup analyses showed similar performance for bolus segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92; I²=74%) and cervical spine segmentation (pooled Dice score=0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91; I²=87%). Despite high accuracy, substantial heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusions

Deep learning–based autosegmentation in VFSS demonstrates promising accuracy across different anatomical targets. However, methodological variability among studies underscores the need for standardized protocols, multicenter datasets, and comparative evaluations of model architectures to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.
评估影像透视吞咽研究中深度学习自动分割的性能和可靠性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:通过meta分析,系统评价基于深度学习的自动分割方法在视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)中的准确性和可靠性。数据来源:通过PubMed、IEEE explore、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库对2013年至2024年间发表的英文研究进行了全面的文献检索。研究选择:如果研究将深度学习技术应用于VFSS解剖结构的自动分割,特别是椎体、颈椎、舌骨或甲状腺软骨-声带复合体(TVC),并报告了定量性能指标,如Dice相似系数,则纳入研究。数据提取:两名独立的审稿人提取研究特征、分割目标、深度学习模型类型和性能指标的数据。使用CLAIM和QUADAS-2工具评估方法学质量。数据综合:10项研究符合纳入标准。随机效应荟萃分析得出总体汇总Dice评分为0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.88, I² = 77%)。亚组分析显示,丸剂分割(汇总Dice评分 = 0.84;95% CI: 0.70-0.92, I² = 74%)和颈椎分割(汇总Dice评分 = 0.83;95% CI: 0.69-0.91, I² = 87%)的效果相似。尽管准确度很高,但观察到大量的异质性。结论:基于深度学习的VFSS自动分割在不同解剖目标上显示出良好的准确性。然而,研究方法的可变性强调了标准化协议、多中心数据集和模型架构的比较评估的必要性,以提高通用性和临床实用性。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42024578117。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书