‘Clinging Together Against the Dark’: A Pragmatist Reading of Sustainability Conversations

IF 4.2 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility Pub Date : 2026-03-23 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1111/beer.12816
Barry A. Colbert, Elizabeth C. Kurucz
{"title":"‘Clinging Together Against the Dark’: A Pragmatist Reading of Sustainability Conversations","authors":"Barry A. Colbert,&nbsp;Elizabeth C. Kurucz","doi":"10.1111/beer.12816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we present a typology of managers' interpretations of sustainability as ‘narrative fields’ derived from a qualitative multi-site study and offer a Pragmatist reading of the results. Pragmatism is grounded in an ethic of meliorism, the belief in the possibility of gradually improving the world through human effort and experimentation. Through a Pragmatist lens we see managers talking the way to better futures: continuously negotiating the big idea of sustainability via their myriad interactions with stakeholders and within their evolving constructions and re-constructions of the relationships among ecology, society, and economy. We find that the contestable concept of sustainability is most usefully conceived as a field of narratives delineated by broad dimensions (discrete/integrated, actual/possible), with <i>sustainability conversations</i>—those that push toward integration and new possibility—as the primary means to move toward living better futures. We conclude with implications for research and management practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"35 2","pages":"744-763"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.12816","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we present a typology of managers' interpretations of sustainability as ‘narrative fields’ derived from a qualitative multi-site study and offer a Pragmatist reading of the results. Pragmatism is grounded in an ethic of meliorism, the belief in the possibility of gradually improving the world through human effort and experimentation. Through a Pragmatist lens we see managers talking the way to better futures: continuously negotiating the big idea of sustainability via their myriad interactions with stakeholders and within their evolving constructions and re-constructions of the relationships among ecology, society, and economy. We find that the contestable concept of sustainability is most usefully conceived as a field of narratives delineated by broad dimensions (discrete/integrated, actual/possible), with sustainability conversations—those that push toward integration and new possibility—as the primary means to move toward living better futures. We conclude with implications for research and management practice.

Abstract Image

“携手对抗黑暗”:可持续发展对话的实用主义解读
在本文中,我们提出了一种类型的管理者对可持续性作为“叙事领域”的解释,这种解释来自于一项定性的多地点研究,并提供了对结果的实用主义解读。实用主义是建立在改良主义伦理的基础上的,它相信通过人类的努力和实验可以逐渐改善世界。通过实用主义的视角,我们看到管理者们在谈论通往更美好未来的道路:通过与利益相关者的无数互动,以及在他们对生态、社会和经济之间关系的不断构建和重建中,不断就可持续发展的大理念进行谈判。我们发现,可持续性的可争议概念被认为是一个由广泛维度(离散/整合,实际/可能)描述的叙事领域,而可持续性对话——那些推动整合和新的可能性的对话——是迈向更美好未来的主要手段。我们总结了对研究和管理实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书