Differences in Religious Attendance Among Disabled and Nondisabled Early and Early Midlife Adults

IF 2.3 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Pub Date : 2026-03-09 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1111/jssr.70008
Scott D. Landes, Katie Mueller
{"title":"Differences in Religious Attendance Among Disabled and Nondisabled Early and Early Midlife Adults","authors":"Scott D. Landes,&nbsp;Katie Mueller","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In general, disabled people value religion as much as people without disability, but do not attend religious services as often. Empirical evidence to date does not robustly examine whether this pattern is applicable even when accounting for possible differences in religiosity among disabled and nondisabled people. Using data from the 2011−2019 National Survey for Family Growth, we examine whether religious affiliation and attendance vary across disability statuses and by importance of religious affiliation among early and early midlife adults. We find that among those who identify as religious, disabled people value their religious affiliation as much as people without disability. Despite this similarity in religious affiliation, levels of religious attendance were lower among disabled than nondisabled people who identified their religious affiliation as very important. Results underscore the need to eliminate ableist barriers that discourage or prevent religious disabled people from accessing the social resources offered by religious congregations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 1","pages":"17-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.70008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In general, disabled people value religion as much as people without disability, but do not attend religious services as often. Empirical evidence to date does not robustly examine whether this pattern is applicable even when accounting for possible differences in religiosity among disabled and nondisabled people. Using data from the 2011−2019 National Survey for Family Growth, we examine whether religious affiliation and attendance vary across disability statuses and by importance of religious affiliation among early and early midlife adults. We find that among those who identify as religious, disabled people value their religious affiliation as much as people without disability. Despite this similarity in religious affiliation, levels of religious attendance were lower among disabled than nondisabled people who identified their religious affiliation as very important. Results underscore the need to eliminate ableist barriers that discourage or prevent religious disabled people from accessing the social resources offered by religious congregations.

Abstract Image

残障与非残障的中年早期及早期成人参加宗教活动的差异
一般来说,残疾人和正常人一样重视宗教,但不经常参加宗教活动。即使考虑到残疾人和非残疾人在宗教信仰上可能存在的差异,迄今为止的经验证据也没有强有力地检验这种模式是否适用。利用2011 - 2019年全国家庭成长调查的数据,我们研究了宗教信仰和出席率是否因残疾状况而异,以及宗教信仰在早期和早期中年成年人中的重要性而异。我们发现,在那些有宗教信仰的人中,残疾人和正常人一样重视他们的宗教信仰。尽管在宗教信仰上有这种相似之处,但残疾人参加宗教活动的程度比认为自己的宗教信仰非常重要的非残疾人要低。结果强调需要消除阻碍或阻止宗教残疾人获得宗教团体提供的社会资源的残疾主义障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews on the social scientific study of religion. Published articles are representative of the best current theoretical and methodological treatments of religion. Substantive areas include both micro-level analysis of religious organizations, institutions, and social change. While many articles published in the journal are sociological, the journal also publishes the work of psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and economists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书