Comparison of HILDA Survey Estimates With the 2006–2021 Censuses

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Australian Economic Review Pub Date : 2026-03-16 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1111/1467-8462.70028
Nicole Watson, Taylor Ey
{"title":"Comparison of HILDA Survey Estimates With the 2006–2021 Censuses","authors":"Nicole Watson,&nbsp;Taylor Ey","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue</h3>\n \n <p>The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey has provided researchers and policymakers with invaluable insights into Australian life for more than two decades. Nevertheless, nonresponse, attrition and shifts in population coverage can affect how representative the sample is over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluate the HILDA Survey's representativeness by comparing its estimates against those from the Census across four time periods and four age groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We find strong alignment across many of the variables examined. For the most part, observed differences can be explained by differences in the questions asked, recall periods or different collection methodologies. Recent immigrants are a concern as they can only join the sample by living with a HILDA household or be included via a top-up sample. Sizeable differences are identified in the proportion of immigrants aged 15–24 and 25–44 in particular, which were corrected in 2011 with the addition of a general top-up sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>We conclude that the HILDA Survey is largely representative of the Australian population and note that the coverage of recent immigrants is in the process of being addressed. Additional immigrant-specific samples are being added in 2024 and 2025 and regular immigrant sample top-ups are needed thereafter.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46348,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Review","volume":"59 1","pages":"75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue

The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey has provided researchers and policymakers with invaluable insights into Australian life for more than two decades. Nevertheless, nonresponse, attrition and shifts in population coverage can affect how representative the sample is over time.

Methods

We evaluate the HILDA Survey's representativeness by comparing its estimates against those from the Census across four time periods and four age groups.

Findings

We find strong alignment across many of the variables examined. For the most part, observed differences can be explained by differences in the questions asked, recall periods or different collection methodologies. Recent immigrants are a concern as they can only join the sample by living with a HILDA household or be included via a top-up sample. Sizeable differences are identified in the proportion of immigrants aged 15–24 and 25–44 in particular, which were corrected in 2011 with the addition of a general top-up sample.

Implications

We conclude that the HILDA Survey is largely representative of the Australian population and note that the coverage of recent immigrants is in the process of being addressed. Additional immigrant-specific samples are being added in 2024 and 2025 and regular immigrant sample top-ups are needed thereafter.

Abstract Image

HILDA调查估计与2006-2021年人口普查的比较
澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)调查为研究人员和政策制定者提供了20多年来对澳大利亚生活的宝贵见解。然而,随着时间的推移,无反应、人口流失和人口覆盖率的变化会影响样本的代表性。方法我们通过比较HILDA调查与人口普查在四个时期和四个年龄组的估计来评估HILDA调查的代表性。我们发现在许多被检查的变量之间有很强的一致性。在大多数情况下,观察到的差异可以通过所问问题、回忆周期或不同的收集方法的差异来解释。最近的移民是一个问题,因为他们只能通过与HILDA家庭住在一起或通过充值样本被纳入样本。在15-24岁和25-44岁移民的比例上发现了相当大的差异,这在2011年通过增加一般补充样本得到了纠正。我们的结论是,HILDA调查在很大程度上代表了澳大利亚人口,并注意到最近移民的覆盖范围正在得到解决。2024年和2025年将增加额外的移民特定样本,此后需要定期补充移民样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: An applied economics journal with a strong policy orientation, The Australian Economic Review publishes high-quality articles applying economic analysis to a wide range of macroeconomic and microeconomic topics relevant to both economic and social policy issues. Produced by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, it is the leading journal of its kind in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. While it is of special interest to Australian academics, students, policy makers, and others interested in the Australian economy, the journal also considers matters of international interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书