Specialist Affordability and Access for People With Disability

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Australian Economic Review Pub Date : 2026-03-16 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1111/1467-8462.70043
James Taylor, Karinna Saxby, Jodie Bailie, Samia Badji, Gozde Aydin, Ryan Liang, Dennis Petrie
{"title":"Specialist Affordability and Access for People With Disability","authors":"James Taylor,&nbsp;Karinna Saxby,&nbsp;Jodie Bailie,&nbsp;Samia Badji,&nbsp;Gozde Aydin,&nbsp;Ryan Liang,&nbsp;Dennis Petrie","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Equitable access to care is a core principle of Medicare and Australia's broader health policy frameworks, yet access to specialist care remains marked by persistent inequities. People with disability experience longer waits, face greater affordability pressures due to lower incomes and encounter greater administrative burden. These disparities undermine progress towards Australia's commitments to equitable and accessible healthcare set out in national and international policy agreements. Addressing them requires understanding the structural barriers that shape specialist access.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This article synthesises evidence on inequities in specialist access and fees for people with disability and identifies policy settings that shape these outcomes. It draws on existing literature, policy documents, and emerging evidence from linked administrative data, including the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Key barriers include the geographic distribution of specialists, wide variation in out-of-pocket fees, fragmented referral pathways and limited care coordination, which may contribute to delayed or foregone care. These inequities are exacerbated by gaps in monitoring healthcare system performance. Australia has no system for tracking specialist wait times, limiting policymakers’ ability to identify disparities. Advances in linked administrative data, particularly PLIDA, provide a foundation for improved monitoring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Improved wait time monitoring, greater fee transparency, targeted incentives for equitable care and strengthened navigation support are needed to improve access to specialist care for people with disability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46348,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Review","volume":"59 1","pages":"109-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.70043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Equitable access to care is a core principle of Medicare and Australia's broader health policy frameworks, yet access to specialist care remains marked by persistent inequities. People with disability experience longer waits, face greater affordability pressures due to lower incomes and encounter greater administrative burden. These disparities undermine progress towards Australia's commitments to equitable and accessible healthcare set out in national and international policy agreements. Addressing them requires understanding the structural barriers that shape specialist access.

Methods

This article synthesises evidence on inequities in specialist access and fees for people with disability and identifies policy settings that shape these outcomes. It draws on existing literature, policy documents, and emerging evidence from linked administrative data, including the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA).

Results

Key barriers include the geographic distribution of specialists, wide variation in out-of-pocket fees, fragmented referral pathways and limited care coordination, which may contribute to delayed or foregone care. These inequities are exacerbated by gaps in monitoring healthcare system performance. Australia has no system for tracking specialist wait times, limiting policymakers’ ability to identify disparities. Advances in linked administrative data, particularly PLIDA, provide a foundation for improved monitoring.

Conclusion

Improved wait time monitoring, greater fee transparency, targeted incentives for equitable care and strengthened navigation support are needed to improve access to specialist care for people with disability.

Abstract Image

残疾人士的专业负担能力和准入
公平获得护理是医疗保险和澳大利亚更广泛的卫生政策框架的核心原则,但获得专科护理仍然存在持续的不平等现象。残疾人的等待时间更长,由于收入较低而面临更大的负担能力压力,并面临更大的行政负担。这些差距破坏了澳大利亚在实现国家和国际政策协定中所载的公平和可获得医疗保健的承诺方面取得的进展。解决这些问题需要了解影响专家访问的结构性障碍。本文综合了有关残疾人获得专家服务和收费不公平的证据,并确定了影响这些结果的政策设置。它利用现有文献、政策文件和来自相关管理数据的新证据,包括个人级别集成数据资产(PLIDA)。结果主要障碍包括专科医生的地理分布、自费费用差异大、转诊途径分散和护理协调有限,这些可能导致延误或放弃护理。监测卫生保健系统绩效方面的差距加剧了这些不公平现象。澳大利亚没有跟踪专家等待时间的系统,限制了政策制定者识别差异的能力。相关行政数据,特别是PLIDA方面的进展为改进监测奠定了基础。结论:改善等待时间监测、提高费用透明度、有针对性地激励公平护理和加强导航支持是改善残疾人获得专科护理的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: An applied economics journal with a strong policy orientation, The Australian Economic Review publishes high-quality articles applying economic analysis to a wide range of macroeconomic and microeconomic topics relevant to both economic and social policy issues. Produced by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, it is the leading journal of its kind in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. While it is of special interest to Australian academics, students, policy makers, and others interested in the Australian economy, the journal also considers matters of international interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书