On Telemedicine Reimbursements and Hospital Adoption: A Policy Analysis Using Causal Inference Methods

IF 10.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Operations Management Pub Date : 2026-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1002/joom.70021
Kang Bok Lee, Andrew Hildebrandt, Nitish Patidar, Shashank Rao
{"title":"On Telemedicine Reimbursements and Hospital Adoption: A Policy Analysis Using Causal Inference Methods","authors":"Kang Bok Lee,&nbsp;Andrew Hildebrandt,&nbsp;Nitish Patidar,&nbsp;Shashank Rao","doi":"10.1002/joom.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There continue to be substantial differences in the quality and access to healthcare available to communities across the United States. Researchers have called this the healthcare divide. Telemedicine, a technology-mediated intervention that promises to bridge this healthcare divide, has been discussed by some as the great leveler. Policymakers, therefore, continue creating legislation that may drive hospitals to adopt telemedicine. Yet, how (or whether) such legislation achieves the goal of telemedicine adoption (and relatedly, healthcare divide reduction) is unclear. In the current study, we investigate a phased introduction of telemedicine reimbursement policies across various states in the United States between 2014 and 2019 to explore the causal effects of such policies on hospital adoption of telemedicine. Results suggest that while reimbursement policies drove the adoption of telemedicine services, this adoption was restricted to inpatient services rather than outpatient ones. We ground our investigation on extant theoretical insights from institutional isomorphism and highlight the limitations in our understanding of the adoption of telemedicine by hospitals in the country.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 2","pages":"257-278"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There continue to be substantial differences in the quality and access to healthcare available to communities across the United States. Researchers have called this the healthcare divide. Telemedicine, a technology-mediated intervention that promises to bridge this healthcare divide, has been discussed by some as the great leveler. Policymakers, therefore, continue creating legislation that may drive hospitals to adopt telemedicine. Yet, how (or whether) such legislation achieves the goal of telemedicine adoption (and relatedly, healthcare divide reduction) is unclear. In the current study, we investigate a phased introduction of telemedicine reimbursement policies across various states in the United States between 2014 and 2019 to explore the causal effects of such policies on hospital adoption of telemedicine. Results suggest that while reimbursement policies drove the adoption of telemedicine services, this adoption was restricted to inpatient services rather than outpatient ones. We ground our investigation on extant theoretical insights from institutional isomorphism and highlight the limitations in our understanding of the adoption of telemedicine by hospitals in the country.

远程医疗报销与医院采用:基于因果推理方法的政策分析
美国各地社区的医疗保健质量和可及性仍然存在很大差异。研究人员称这种现象为“医疗鸿沟”。远程医疗是一种以技术为媒介的干预手段,有望弥合这一医疗鸿沟,一些人认为它是最伟大的平衡器。因此,政策制定者继续制定立法,可能会推动医院采用远程医疗。然而,此类立法如何(或是否)实现远程医疗采用的目标(以及相关的医疗鸿沟减少)尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了2014年至2019年美国各州分阶段引入的远程医疗报销政策,以探讨这些政策对医院采用远程医疗的因果影响。结果表明,虽然报销政策推动了远程医疗服务的采用,但这种采用仅限于住院服务,而不是门诊服务。我们的调查基于现有的制度同构的理论见解,并强调了我们对该国医院采用远程医疗的理解的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书