“It Is Vital That We Should Not Keep It to Ourselves”: The Rats of Tobruk Association and the Siege of Tobruk in Australian National Memory

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY
Australian Journal of Politics and History Pub Date : 2026-03-02 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1111/ajph.70021
Nicole Townsend
{"title":"“It Is Vital That We Should Not Keep It to Ourselves”: The Rats of Tobruk Association and the Siege of Tobruk in Australian National Memory","authors":"Nicole Townsend","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The siege of Tobruk is one of the most well-known Australian actions of the Second World War, enjoying special attention on Anzac Day. Its elevation within Australian national memory is by no means accidental. Rather, it is the result of decades of lobbying by the Rats of Tobruk Association (ROTA), which positioned veterans of the siege as the successors to Anzac and fought to ensure the siege was not forgotten by subsequent generations. In charting ROTA's lobbying efforts after the war, this article argues that while ROTA's successful campaign for a national memorial in Canberra ensured Tobruk's place in the national commemorative landscape, the association's development of relationships with schools across Australia has ensured the posterity of the siege in Australian popular memory at an individual level. On the other hand, ROTA's failed attempts to secure a dedicated National Day of Commemoration for the siege and legal protection for the word “Tobruk” demonstrate the dominance of Anzac within the Australian psyche, which influenced government decisions on these matters. Finally, it highlights the potential for conflict between veterans' organisations, whose interests do not always align and raise questions about which groups should determine how events are remembered.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"143-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajph.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The siege of Tobruk is one of the most well-known Australian actions of the Second World War, enjoying special attention on Anzac Day. Its elevation within Australian national memory is by no means accidental. Rather, it is the result of decades of lobbying by the Rats of Tobruk Association (ROTA), which positioned veterans of the siege as the successors to Anzac and fought to ensure the siege was not forgotten by subsequent generations. In charting ROTA's lobbying efforts after the war, this article argues that while ROTA's successful campaign for a national memorial in Canberra ensured Tobruk's place in the national commemorative landscape, the association's development of relationships with schools across Australia has ensured the posterity of the siege in Australian popular memory at an individual level. On the other hand, ROTA's failed attempts to secure a dedicated National Day of Commemoration for the siege and legal protection for the word “Tobruk” demonstrate the dominance of Anzac within the Australian psyche, which influenced government decisions on these matters. Finally, it highlights the potential for conflict between veterans' organisations, whose interests do not always align and raise questions about which groups should determine how events are remembered.

Abstract Image

“至关重要的是,我们不应该把它留给自己”:托布鲁克协会的老鼠和澳大利亚民族记忆中的托布鲁克围攻
托布鲁克围城是澳大利亚在第二次世界大战中最著名的行动之一,在澳新军团日受到特别关注。它在澳大利亚国民记忆中的提升绝非偶然。相反,这是托布鲁克老鼠协会(ROTA)数十年游说的结果,该协会将围城战的老兵定位为澳新军团的继承者,并努力确保围城战不会被后代遗忘。在描绘ROTA在战后的游说努力时,本文认为,虽然ROTA在堪培拉成功地建立了一个国家纪念馆,确保了托布鲁克在国家纪念景观中的地位,但该协会与澳大利亚各地学校的关系发展,确保了澳大利亚民众在个人层面上对围困的后代的记忆。另一方面,ROTA试图为围城战设立一个专门的国庆日,并为“托布鲁克”一词提供法律保护,但未能成功,这表明澳新军团在澳大利亚人心中的主导地位,影响了政府在这些问题上的决定。最后,它突出了退伍军人组织之间冲突的可能性,这些组织的利益并不总是一致的,并提出了哪些组织应该决定如何纪念事件的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Politics and History presents papers addressing significant problems of general interest to those working in the fields of history, political studies and international affairs. Articles explore the politics and history of Australia and modern Europe, intellectual history, political history, and the history of political thought. The journal also publishes articles in the fields of international politics, Australian foreign policy, and Australia relations with the countries of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书