Change From Within: Building Support for Climate Policy in Groups Stereotypically Associated With Climate Opposition or Disengagement

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
European Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2026-03-03 Epub Date: 2025-12-22 DOI:10.1002/ejsp.70046
Sarah J. Boddington, R. M. Colvin, Kelly S. Fielding, Samantha K. Stanley, Winnifred R. Louis
{"title":"Change From Within: Building Support for Climate Policy in Groups Stereotypically Associated With Climate Opposition or Disengagement","authors":"Sarah J. Boddington,&nbsp;R. M. Colvin,&nbsp;Kelly S. Fielding,&nbsp;Samantha K. Stanley,&nbsp;Winnifred R. Louis","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite broad support for climate policy across countries, some groups remain stereotypically associated with opposition to or disengagement from climate action. Examples include farmers and political conservatives. We interview 18 participants from six advocacy organisations trying to change their group's opposition to or disengagement from climate action and create norms of climate policy support. We introduce the term in-group advocacy to describe their efforts to build support within their groups for a social cause. Participants employed three strategies to pursue change while keeping their groups cohesive: framing change as aligned with the group's true identity, arguing change is needed in these times and facilitating group interaction to calibrate the pace of change. We find managing intense criticism from group members required organising substantial social support for spokespeople. Four of the advocacy organisations engaged in identity leadership, trying to change their group's identity to achieve their objectives.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 2","pages":"367-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite broad support for climate policy across countries, some groups remain stereotypically associated with opposition to or disengagement from climate action. Examples include farmers and political conservatives. We interview 18 participants from six advocacy organisations trying to change their group's opposition to or disengagement from climate action and create norms of climate policy support. We introduce the term in-group advocacy to describe their efforts to build support within their groups for a social cause. Participants employed three strategies to pursue change while keeping their groups cohesive: framing change as aligned with the group's true identity, arguing change is needed in these times and facilitating group interaction to calibrate the pace of change. We find managing intense criticism from group members required organising substantial social support for spokespeople. Four of the advocacy organisations engaged in identity leadership, trying to change their group's identity to achieve their objectives.

从内部改变:在与气候反对或脱离接触刻板印象相关的群体中建立对气候政策的支持
尽管气候政策得到各国的广泛支持,但一些群体仍然被刻板地与反对或不参与气候行动联系在一起。例子包括农民和政治保守派。我们采访了来自6个倡导组织的18位参与者,他们试图改变自己的团体对气候行动的反对或脱离,并创建气候政策支持的规范。我们引入“群体内倡导”一词来描述他们为社会事业在群体内建立支持的努力。参与者采用了三种策略来追求变革,同时保持团队的凝聚力:将变革与团队的真实身份相一致,认为在这个时代需要变革,促进团队互动以校准变革的步伐。我们发现,管理来自团体成员的强烈批评,需要为发言人组织大量的社会支持。其中四个倡导组织从事身份领导,试图改变其群体的身份以实现其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书