Beyond Comorbidity: Evolutionary Insights Into the Concomitance of Neurodivergence, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorders

IF 3.2 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Benjamin Griffin, Riya Gosrani, Jessica Eccles
{"title":"Beyond Comorbidity: Evolutionary Insights Into the Concomitance of Neurodivergence, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorders","authors":"Benjamin Griffin,&nbsp;Riya Gosrani,&nbsp;Jessica Eccles","doi":"10.1111/eva.70221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mainstream psychiatry continues to interpret neurodivergence through a disease paradigm, assuming that all cases of autism and ADHD reflect disordered brain development. This framing has contributed to the view that elevated rates of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses found in neurodivergent populations can be explained through shared mechanisms of neurobiological dysfunction. The neurodiversity movement has challenged this view, reframing neurodiversity as natural variation within human cognition, and emphasizing that much of the associated distress in neurodivergent individuals arises from systemic social barriers, rather than internal dysfunction. In contrast to the disease paradigm's individualizing focus, this relational perspective suggests psychopathology in neurodivergent individuals arises primarily from the poor fit between their cognitive profiles and modern environments. Evolutionary psychiatry may offer a scientific foundation for this reframing. Here, we synthesize evolutionary insights on autism, ADHD, and affective disorders to provide a novel explanation for elevated rates of major depression and anxiety disorders in neurodivergent populations, based upon the principles of evolutionary trade-offs and mismatch. This perspective offers a scientifically grounded and ethically progressive framework for understanding neurodivergence and its psychiatric comorbidities; one that emphasizes prevention and environmental accommodation, instead of pathologisation and deficit-correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":168,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Applications","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eva.70221","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Applications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.70221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mainstream psychiatry continues to interpret neurodivergence through a disease paradigm, assuming that all cases of autism and ADHD reflect disordered brain development. This framing has contributed to the view that elevated rates of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses found in neurodivergent populations can be explained through shared mechanisms of neurobiological dysfunction. The neurodiversity movement has challenged this view, reframing neurodiversity as natural variation within human cognition, and emphasizing that much of the associated distress in neurodivergent individuals arises from systemic social barriers, rather than internal dysfunction. In contrast to the disease paradigm's individualizing focus, this relational perspective suggests psychopathology in neurodivergent individuals arises primarily from the poor fit between their cognitive profiles and modern environments. Evolutionary psychiatry may offer a scientific foundation for this reframing. Here, we synthesize evolutionary insights on autism, ADHD, and affective disorders to provide a novel explanation for elevated rates of major depression and anxiety disorders in neurodivergent populations, based upon the principles of evolutionary trade-offs and mismatch. This perspective offers a scientifically grounded and ethically progressive framework for understanding neurodivergence and its psychiatric comorbidities; one that emphasizes prevention and environmental accommodation, instead of pathologisation and deficit-correction.

Abstract Image

超越共病:神经分化、重度抑郁障碍和焦虑障碍共病的进化见解
主流精神病学继续通过一种疾病范式来解释神经分化,假设所有自闭症和多动症病例都反映了大脑发育障碍。这一框架促成了这样一种观点,即在神经分化人群中发现的同时发生的精神病诊断的高发率可以通过神经生物学功能障碍的共同机制来解释。神经多样性运动挑战了这一观点,将神经多样性重新定义为人类认知的自然变异,并强调神经分化个体的许多相关痛苦源于系统性的社会障碍,而不是内部功能障碍。与疾病范式的个体化焦点相反,这种关系观点表明,神经分化个体的精神病理学主要源于他们的认知特征与现代环境之间的不匹配。进化精神病学可能为这种重构提供科学基础。在这里,我们综合了关于自闭症、多动症和情感障碍的进化见解,基于进化权衡和不匹配的原则,为神经分化人群中重度抑郁症和焦虑症的发病率升高提供了一种新的解释。这一观点为理解神经分化及其精神合并症提供了一个科学基础和道德进步的框架;它强调预防和环境适应,而不是病态化和赤字纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Applications
Evolutionary Applications 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Applications is a fully peer reviewed open access journal. It publishes papers that utilize concepts from evolutionary biology to address biological questions of health, social and economic relevance. Papers are expected to employ evolutionary concepts or methods to make contributions to areas such as (but not limited to): medicine, agriculture, forestry, exploitation and management (fisheries and wildlife), aquaculture, conservation biology, environmental sciences (including climate change and invasion biology), microbiology, and toxicology. All taxonomic groups are covered from microbes, fungi, plants and animals. In order to better serve the community, we also now strongly encourage submissions of papers making use of modern molecular and genetic methods (population and functional genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, quantitative genetics, association and linkage mapping) to address important questions in any of these disciplines and in an applied evolutionary framework. Theoretical, empirical, synthesis or perspective papers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书