Gender and Impact of Multiple Climate-Smart Agricultural (CSA) Practices on Nutritional Outcomes and Multidimensional Poverty Status of Cassava Farmers in Nigeria

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Chinasa Sylvia Onyenekwe, Chukwuma Ume, Anthony O. Onoja, Anthonia I. Achike, Jane Mbolle Chah
{"title":"Gender and Impact of Multiple Climate-Smart Agricultural (CSA) Practices on Nutritional Outcomes and Multidimensional Poverty Status of Cassava Farmers in Nigeria","authors":"Chinasa Sylvia Onyenekwe,&nbsp;Chukwuma Ume,&nbsp;Anthony O. Onoja,&nbsp;Anthonia I. Achike,&nbsp;Jane Mbolle Chah","doi":"10.1111/agec.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is significant potential to enhance food security and address nutrition and poverty in smallholder farming systems through the adoption of climate-sensitive agriculture practices (CSA). However, adoption rates of CSA practices remain uneven across genders due to disparities in access to resources, decision-making power, and socio-economic barriers. Similarly, while CSA practices are widely recognized for their potential benefits, the combined effects of using multiple practices to improve food security, nutrition, and poverty reduction remain poorly studied and not fully understood. This study analyzes data from four waves of the Nigeria General Household Survey, using fixed effects multivariate logit models and a panel endogenous switching regression framework to examine the factors influencing CSA adoption and its outcomes. The results show notable gender differences: male farmers are more likely to adopt organic manure and practice mixed cropping, while women focus more on improved seeds and combining organic and inorganic manure. Integrated CSA strategies, especially combining organic manure with mixed cropping, lead to significant gains in food security and reductions in multidimensional poverty. Nonetheless, organic/inorganic manure combinations are underused, mainly due to resource constraints and perceived inefficiencies. Addressing gender-specific barriers and maximizing the benefits of CSA practices can provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners. The study recommends gender-sensitive policies, better financial inclusion, and customized extension services to promote sustainable farming practices that boost food security, resilience, and livelihoods in smallholder systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is significant potential to enhance food security and address nutrition and poverty in smallholder farming systems through the adoption of climate-sensitive agriculture practices (CSA). However, adoption rates of CSA practices remain uneven across genders due to disparities in access to resources, decision-making power, and socio-economic barriers. Similarly, while CSA practices are widely recognized for their potential benefits, the combined effects of using multiple practices to improve food security, nutrition, and poverty reduction remain poorly studied and not fully understood. This study analyzes data from four waves of the Nigeria General Household Survey, using fixed effects multivariate logit models and a panel endogenous switching regression framework to examine the factors influencing CSA adoption and its outcomes. The results show notable gender differences: male farmers are more likely to adopt organic manure and practice mixed cropping, while women focus more on improved seeds and combining organic and inorganic manure. Integrated CSA strategies, especially combining organic manure with mixed cropping, lead to significant gains in food security and reductions in multidimensional poverty. Nonetheless, organic/inorganic manure combinations are underused, mainly due to resource constraints and perceived inefficiencies. Addressing gender-specific barriers and maximizing the benefits of CSA practices can provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners. The study recommends gender-sensitive policies, better financial inclusion, and customized extension services to promote sustainable farming practices that boost food security, resilience, and livelihoods in smallholder systems.

性别和多种气候智慧型农业(CSA)实践对尼日利亚木薯农民营养状况和多维贫困状况的影响
通过采用气候敏感型农业做法(CSA),在加强小农农业系统的粮食安全、解决营养和贫困问题方面具有巨大潜力。然而,由于在获取资源、决策权和社会经济障碍方面的差异,CSA实践的采用率在性别之间仍然不平衡。同样,尽管CSA实践因其潜在益处而得到广泛认可,但使用多种实践来改善粮食安全、营养和减贫的综合效应仍未得到充分研究和充分理解。本研究利用固定效应多变量logit模型和面板内生转换回归框架,分析了尼日利亚四波综合住户调查的数据,考察了影响CSA采用及其结果的因素。结果显示出显著的性别差异:男性农民更倾向于采用有机肥和混作,而女性更倾向于改良种子和有机与无机肥料的结合。综合CSA战略,特别是将有机肥与混合种植相结合,可在粮食安全和减少多维贫困方面取得重大进展。然而,有机/无机肥料组合未得到充分利用,主要是由于资源限制和效率低下。解决性别障碍和最大化CSA实践的好处可以为决策者和从业者提供有价值的见解。该研究建议采取对性别问题有敏感认识的政策,改善金融包容性,并提供定制化推广服务,以促进可持续农业实践,从而提高小农系统的粮食安全、抵御力和生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书