Effects of Opportunity Costs on Delay Discounting for Hypothetical Food and Money

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Andrew Harmon, Luis R. Rodriguez, Kelsie L. Hendrickson, Brianna Prien, Erin B. Rasmussen
{"title":"Effects of Opportunity Costs on Delay Discounting for Hypothetical Food and Money","authors":"Andrew Harmon,&nbsp;Luis R. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Kelsie L. Hendrickson,&nbsp;Brianna Prien,&nbsp;Erin B. Rasmussen","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Delay discounting refers to a decrease in subjective value of an outcome as its receipt is delayed. In discounting studies, properties of the delay are important, but understudied, methodological details. One aspect of the delay is opportunity costs, which refers to alternative reinforcement that is forgone while waiting for a reward. Research shows that verbal narratives specifying high opportunity costs lead to steeper discounting for money and cigarettes. However, opportunity costs have not been examined with food discounting. The current study examined the extent to which opportunity costs affect discounting for money (Experiment 1) and food (Experiment 2) using within-subjects designs. Participants were presented with narratives specifying differing magnitudes of opportunity costs prior to completing four discounting tasks for two magnitudes of money (Exp 1) or food (Exp 2). Results indicated that as opportunity costs increased, discounting for both money and food also increased. Magnitude effects were also found; the smallest magnitudes of money and food were discounted most steeply. Lastly, systematic responding was lower, but more consistent across opportunity costs for food compared to money, indicating choice stability with money is more sensitive to opportunity costs. These results then replicate and extend opportunity costs to food discounting.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delay discounting refers to a decrease in subjective value of an outcome as its receipt is delayed. In discounting studies, properties of the delay are important, but understudied, methodological details. One aspect of the delay is opportunity costs, which refers to alternative reinforcement that is forgone while waiting for a reward. Research shows that verbal narratives specifying high opportunity costs lead to steeper discounting for money and cigarettes. However, opportunity costs have not been examined with food discounting. The current study examined the extent to which opportunity costs affect discounting for money (Experiment 1) and food (Experiment 2) using within-subjects designs. Participants were presented with narratives specifying differing magnitudes of opportunity costs prior to completing four discounting tasks for two magnitudes of money (Exp 1) or food (Exp 2). Results indicated that as opportunity costs increased, discounting for both money and food also increased. Magnitude effects were also found; the smallest magnitudes of money and food were discounted most steeply. Lastly, systematic responding was lower, but more consistent across opportunity costs for food compared to money, indicating choice stability with money is more sensitive to opportunity costs. These results then replicate and extend opportunity costs to food discounting.

机会成本对假设性食物和货币延迟折现的影响
延迟贴现是指由于收到延迟,结果的主观价值减少。在贴现研究中,延迟的性质是重要的,但尚未得到充分研究的方法细节。延迟的一个方面是机会成本,这是指在等待奖励时放弃的替代强化。研究表明,指出高机会成本的口头叙述会导致金钱和香烟的大幅折扣。然而,机会成本还没有通过食品折扣进行检验。目前的研究使用受试者内设计检验了机会成本对金钱(实验1)和食物(实验2)折扣的影响程度。在完成四项针对两种货币(实验1)或食物(实验2)的贴现任务之前,研究人员向参与者介绍了不同数量的机会成本。结果表明,随着机会成本的增加,货币和食品的折扣也会增加。还发现了量级效应;最小数额的钱和食物都打了最大的折扣。最后,与金钱相比,食物的系统反应更低,但在机会成本上更一致,这表明金钱的选择稳定性对机会成本更敏感。这些结果随后复制并将机会成本扩展到食品折扣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad base of content and style. It publishes original empirical reports, critical review papers, theoretical analyses and methodological contributions. The Journal also features book, software and decision aiding technique reviews, abstracts of important articles published elsewhere and teaching suggestions. The objective of the Journal is to present and stimulate behavioral research on decision making and to provide a forum for the evaluation of complementary, contrasting and conflicting perspectives. These perspectives include psychology, management science, sociology, political science and economics. Studies of behavioral decision making in naturalistic and applied settings are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书